Xxxxxx and S. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx X.
Xxxxxx and S. H.M.A. Dumoulin, Director and Secretary respectively.
Xxxxxx and S. Xxxxx Xxxx by deed recorded in Deed Record 290, at page 210 of the Deed Records of Xxxxx County, State of Indiana; thence South along said east property line one hundred sixty and 71/100 (160.71) feet to the centerline of the vacated fourteen (14) Foot alley between Xxxxxxxxxx (now Xxxxxxx) and Xxxxxx (now Xxxxxxxxxxxx) Streets; thence east along said centerline of said vacated alley, one hundred and fifty nine (159) feet, more or less, to the west property line of Clinton Street as it existed in 1925; thence north along the said west property line of Clinton Street to the place of beginning. PARCEL 12 (1-A-B) The vacated alley lying East of and adjacent to Lots Numbered 91 to 101, inclusive, and Lots Numbered 103 to 107 inclusive, in Xxxxxxxx'x Third Addition to the city of Fort Xxxxx, Xxxxx County, Indiana, said alley having been vacated under Declaratory Resolution No. 1401-1975. PARCEL 13 (1-B-5) Lots Numbered 62, 63 and 64, all being in Brackenridge's Addition to the City of Fort Xxxxx, Indiana, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book 0, page 82, in the Office of the Recorder of Xxxxx County, Indiana Together with an overhead walkway as described on Declaratory Resolution No. 1423-76 adopted June 7, 1976 and confirmed July 29, 1976 by the Board of Public Works of the City of Fort Xxxxx, Indiana. PARCEL 14 (1-Z) Xxx 0 xxx xxx Xxxx xxx-xxxx xx Xxx X in Xxxxx'x Addition to the City of Fort Xxxxx, Indiana, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Deed record 31, page 20, in the Office of the Recorder of Xxxxx County, Indiana. PARCEL 15 (3-J) Lots Numbered 4, 5 and 6, together with the South Half of the vacated alley lying North of and adjacent to said Lot 6, all being in Xxxxx'x Addition to the City of Fort Xxxxx, Indiana, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Deed Record 31, page 20, in the Office of the Recorder of Xxxxx County, Indiana. PARCEL 16 (3-J) Lots Numbered 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 and 61, together with the North Half of the vacated alley lying South of and adjacent to said Lot 61, all being in Brackenridge's Addition to the City of Fort Xxxxx, Indiana, according to the plat thereof, recorded in Plat Book O, page 82, in the Office of the Recorder of Xxxxx County, Indiana. Together with an overhead walkway as described in Declaratory Resolution No. 1423-76 adopted June 7, 1976 and confirmed July 29, 1976 by the Board of Public Works of the City of Fort Xxxxx, Indiana. The East Half of Lot Numbered 57 and all of Lots Numbered 5...
Xxxxxx and S. Geretshuber (Eds.), 3th International Workshop, CRITIS 2008, “Critical Information Infrastructure Security”, Springer, 2009
Xxxxxx and S. Mol from the Dutch Ministry of Infrastructure and Environment. The Hague. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2013). Interview with Xxx Xxxxxxxx, Province of Gelderland. Interview held by Xxxxxxx xxx Xx, Radboud University Nijmegen. Provincie Gelderland. (2011, January). Beoordelingsrapport: toets op veiligheid 2011: derde toetsronde primaire waterker- ingen: Dijkringgebied 48; Rijn en IJssel. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xx/4-old/Home/Dijkringgebied- Rijn-en-IJssel.html Xxxxxxxx, X. (2004). Europeanization: Solution or problem? European Integration Online Papers, 8(16), 1 – 23. Retrieved from xxxx://xxxx.xx.xx/eiop/texte/2004-016a.htm Xxxxxx, X. (2013, April 7). Interview with Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, Grensoverschrijdend Platform Regionaal Waterbeheer, Nijmegen. Rijksoverheid. (2010). Plan van aanpak: implementatie van de EU Richtlijn Overstromingsrisico’s, kaarten, plannen, reporting, Eindconcept. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx/publish/pages/25023/plan_van_aanpak_ april_2010_doc.doc Rijksoverheid. (2014). Ruimte voor de Rivier. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx/onderwerpen/water-en- veiligheid/ruimte-voor-de-xxxxxx Xxxx, T. (2013, October 22). Interview Xxxxxxx Xxxx: Wasserverband Eifel-Rur. Telephone interview. Ruimte voor de Rivier. (2006, December 19). Planologische Kernbeslissing Ruimte voor de Rivier. Vastgesteld besluit. Ruimte voor de Rivier. (2014). Werkwijze Ruimte voor de Rivier. Retrieved from xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xx/ het-programma/werkwijze/ Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx, X. (2013, October 14). Interview with Xxxxxx Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx. ICPR, Koblenz. Xxxxx, X., Xxxxxxx, X., Xxxxx, X., & Xxxx¨ttrumpf, X. (2009). Risico-analyse voor de grensoverschrijdende dijkringen langs de Niederrhein, Duits-Nederlandse Werkgroep Hoogwater, April 2009. Retrieved from xxxx://xxxxxxxxxxx. xxxxxxx.xx/xxxxxxxxxx/xxxxxxxxxxxxx-x-x-xxx-xxxxx-berschreitenden-deichringe-am-xxxxxx Xx Xxxxx, X. X. (2011). Rhine at risk? Impact of climate change on low-probability fioods in the Rhine basin and the effec- tiveness of fiood management measure (PhD dissertation). Amsterdam: VU University Amsterdam. Xxx xx Xxxxx, X. (2009). Uploading Dutch water policy to the European level: The infiuence of a small Member State on the European policy-making process (Master thesis). Nijmegen: Radboud University. Xxx xxx Xxxx, X. (2013, May 23). Presentation at the national ROR-day. Ede. Xxx xxx Xxxx, X., & Xxxxxx, X. (2012). Deltafact: richtlijn overstromingsrisico’s. Deltares, STOWA (Stichting Toegepast...
Xxxxxx and S. R. Xxxx, asked the respondent to visit Uganda and explore the possibility of his working for the company in their soap and oil factory in Uganda. The company and the respondent appear to have agreed that during the exploratory period, in Uganda, the company would pay to the respondent a monthly salary of US$800 and also give him other benefits. The salary would be increased to $1050 (and not US 1150 as pleaded) if he accepted to continue working in Uganda and his family joined him. Pursuant to that agreement the respondent came to Uganda on 17/1/1997. His travel expenses were met by the company.
Xxxxxx and S. Portegies Xxxxx. Gravitational Tree-Code on Graph- ics Processing Units: Implementation in CUDA. In International Conference on Com- putational Science 2010. Elsevier, 2010.
Xxxxxx and S. Mill Avenue and the Developer pays all costs associated with the relocation of any utilities serving the Project which may be required as a result of Developer's relocation of the Easement Areas. Prior to relocating the Easement Area, Developer shall seek approval from the City, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed; provided, however, that the City's subsequent approval of an amendment or modification to the site plan for the Project that alters the Easement Area shall be deemed to be the City's approval required by this sentence.
Xxxxxx and S. Person Streets. The Xxxxx Square East is located just to the east of Xxxxx Square public park.
Xxxxxx and S. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx each hereby represents and warrants that all of the representations and warranties of the Company set forth in Section 6 above are true and correct.
