Low performing school definition

Low performing school means a district school or charter school that has been
Low performing school means a school that:
Low performing school means a district school or charter school that has been designated a low performing school by the state board because the school is:

Examples of Low performing school in a sentence

  • Low performing school A highly qualified graduate, whose initial teaching assignment is in a low performing school shall receive a monthly supplement of the equivalent of the difference in the State funded salary of the graduate and the State funded salary of a teacher on the “A” Schedule with 3 years of experience.

  • Low performing school: A low performing school is one whose three-year value-added gain score is -.1 or greater.

  • Low performing school districts are those with a letter grade of C, D, or F.


More Definitions of Low performing school

Low performing school means a public school in a school
Low performing school means any public school that meets the
Low performing school means a public school in a school district organized under Article 34 of this Code that enrolls students in any of grades kindergarten through 8 and that is ranked within the lowest 10% of schools in that district in terms of the percentage of students meeting or exceeding standards on the assessments required under Section 2-3.64a-5 of this Code.
Low performing school means any public school that meets the criteria of paragraph (1) or paragraph (2):
Low performing school. (Statewide Rank 1, 2, or 3) means a school which ranks in the bottom 30% in the Academic Performance Index (“API”) of schools tested pursuant to the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 in the most current testing cycle as identified by statistics prepared by the Department of Education.
Low performing school means a school that is for two consecutive school years in the lowest performing:
Low performing school or “LPS” means an elementary school where 50.0 percent or more of the general education students were not proficient on the 2002 ESPA Language Arts Literacy subtest, adjusted by the Commissioner or a school identified as 'in need of improvement' under No Child Left Behind.