not acceptable means that the local government wishes to determine the application, as a delegate of the WAPC, in a manner that is inconsistent with the recommendation received from the public agency to which the local government was required to consult under this Notice of Delegation.
not acceptable performance for a targeted analyte in a given sample matrix for the two most recent test sessions (e.g., Pu-238 in soil test 13 “+N” (+36% bias), Pu-238 in soil test 14 “-N” (- 43% bias));
not acceptable means that the human resources, information systems and other resources do not meet HPSJ’s expectations or program requirements and rectifying the situation will require extensive effort on the part of the entity.
More Definitions of not acceptable
not acceptable. Buyer authorizes Broker to accept any bonus a developer offers if Buyer closes on one of the developer's homes. At this time, Louisiana REALTORS® does not endorse the use of broker-to-broker compensation forms and will reevaluate this recommendation as matters evolve.
not acceptable means that the PT study provider or ELAP has determined that the PT study findings do not meet acceptance criteria specified for the study undertaken.
not acceptable performance for a targeted analyte in two or more sample matrices for the current test session (e.g., Cs-137 in water test 14 “+N” (+38%), Cs-137 in soil test 14 “+N” (+45%)); Consistent bias, either positive or negative, at the “Warning” level (greater than ±20% bias) for a targeted analyte in a given sample matrix for the two most recent test sessions (e.g., Sr- 90 in air filter test 13 “+W” (+26%), Sr-90 in air filter test 14 “+W” (+28%)); Quality issues (flags other than “Acceptable”) that weren’t identified by the above criteria for a targeted analyte in a given sample matrix over the last three test sessions (e.g., Am-241 in soil test 12 “-N” (-47%), Am-241 in soil test 13 “+W” (+24%), Am-241 in soil test 14 “- N” (-38%)); Any other performance indicator and/or historical trending that demonstrate an obvious quality concern (e.g., consistent “False Positive” results for Pu-238 in all tested matrices over the last three test sessions). A review period of about two weeks is provided at the close of each MAPEP test session prior to the release of final results to DOE stakeholders and the general public. Any participating laboratory may question or appeal performance evaluation results during this review period. All laboratories may respond to a Letter of Concern by contacting MAPEP, and many frequently do so. Laboratories can also request additional MAPEP standards at any time for verification of measurement processes, and many have utilized this option. In addition to issuing Letters of Concern, the MAPEP Team provides technical assistance whenever requested, to both MAPEP participants and DOE/contractor oversight personnel. MAPEP Letters of Concern are instrumental in this process by providing a method of communication that focuses attention on analytical performance. When used as intended, the MAPEP Letters of Concern assist laboratories and DOE/contractor oversight personnel avoid potential quality problems and correct quality issues in a timely manner. It is important to note that MAPEP is a proficiency-testing program, not an enforcement organization. MAPEP can identify potential quality concerns, but MAPEP does not issue or enforce corrective actions. The majority of analytical services under contract with DOE rely on a DOE field organization or primary contractor for oversight of the analytical services. Therefore, DOE field management, DOE contractors, and oversight personnel are responsible to ensure analytical services contracted with DOE for...
not acceptable means if there is clear physical degradation and destruction of nature and natural pro- cesses (e.g. over-harvesting of forests, paving over critical wildlife habitats) as a result of the AD project. ‘Moderately acceptable’ signifies unavoidable disturbances of nature to only a small degree.