Quality Problems Sample Clauses

Quality Problems. Licensee and Grant shall cooperate to resolve problems Licensee or its Sub-Licensees may have in complying with Atlas Bradford Connection standards and specifications of quality. In the event Atlas Bradford Connections that are Threaded or Reconstructed by Licensee or its Sub-Licensees utilizing the licenses from Grant fail to comply with Grant standards and specifications of quality, then Licensee and its Sub-Licensees, as the case may be, shall refrain from marketing or selling such non-conforming Atlas Bradford Connections until such time as the problems causing such non conformance are solved.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality Problems. In the event of a quality problem, access to batch and pro- duction data has to be possible within one calendar day. If the problems are due to the quality of the products, con- tractual partners are obligated to work out approaches to solutions within one business day after the problem has occurred. Supplier has to ensure that short-term access to resources for fault analysis is possible at any time. The procedure for the handling of complaints is stipulated as follows: - 1 calendar day at the latest after receipt of <infor- mation/parts> (or pictures, defect samples, respectively), acknowledgement of receipt has to be sent to juwi. - 2 calendar days at the latest after receipt of <infor- mation/parts> (if needed for a primary response), primary response has to be sent to juwi. Contents of primary re- sponse: 8D-report including section „Immediate Measures“. - 14 calendar days at the latest after juwi issued the com- plaint, a complete 8D-report has to be submitted. If this is not possible, Supplier has to report this together with a detailed interim report. This interim report also has to state when the complete 8D-report (or the next interim report, respectively) will be submitted. The period between two interim reports must not exceed 14 calendar days. This pe- riod of time (of 14 calendar days for submitting the com- plete 8D-report) may only be prolonged on the basis of de- tailed interim reports Final fault analysis reports have to be meaningful, coherent and complete with regard to contents. The reporting format has to be that of the 8D-report. 5 Environmental Protection/ Occupational Safety Supplier agrees to observe all statutory regulations on envi- ronmental protection and to keep impact on people and the environment as low as possible with the help of adequate conservation programs and adequate internal environmental protection. For this purpose, the introduction and further development of an environmental management system (EMS) according to ISO 14001 is expected. juwi reserves the right to assess the level of implementation with the help of audits. If the Supplier performs services on juwi’s premises, he will observe the relevant safety and accident prevention regula- tions and respect juwi’s instructions concerning the behavior at the company site. 6 Final Provisions All changes and amendments to this Quality Assurance Agreement must be made in writing If a provision of this Quality Assurance Agreement is partly or entirely invalid, the rem...
Quality Problems. 1. In case of deviations from the product- or the performance specification (drawing, technical terms of delivery, material, material properties, etc.) or from released procedures, the Sup- plier shall obtain a written deviation permit from GAUDLITZ before delivering the products. Potential arising expenditures which result from granting the deviation permit shall be at the Supplier’s expense. 2. If the Supplier or his subcontractor detects an increase in deviations of the actual condition of the Products from their specified condition (quality fall-offs), he shall, without delay (with- in 24 hours), inform the Ordering Party thereof and about the remedial action he intends to take. Until those corrective actions will take effect, the Ordering Party is able to demand special measures (e.g. higher testing frequency) for an appropriate period. It shall be for the Sup- plier to prove the restored accuracy of the contractual products and the achievement of the arranged quality level. Hereby arising additional costs are at the Supplier’s expense, pro- vided that the quality fall-off was not verifiably caused by the Ordering Party. 3. The Supplier shall, by marking the packing (traceability) or, if this should be impossible or inappropriate, by other suitable measures, take care to ensure that, as soon as any non- conformity of any of the Products occurs, he can identify which further Products might be affected. The Supplier shall inform the Ordering Party about his marking system or other measures, so as to enable the Ordering Party to carry out its own investigations to the ex- tent necessary. In the event of a quality problem, there shall be the possibility of access to lot and produc- tion data within one working day. Insofar as the problems issue from the quality of the products, the contracting parties are obliged to elaborate on approaches within one working day after appearance of the problem. The Supplier shall ensure that a short-term access to resources for inspecting and analyzing defects will be guaranteed at any time. 4. In the event of complaints, GAUDLITZ shall ask the Supplier for the presentation of an 8D report. The deadlines set therein, shall be considered by the Supplier. If it is not possible for the Supplier to meet the set deadlines, thus he shall communicate this in combination with a well-founded interim report. Final reports of error analyses shall to be meaningful, conclu- sive and complete with regard to contents. 5. For every justi...
Quality Problems. In the event of a quality problem, access to batch and production data has to be possible within three business days. If the problems are due to the quality of the products, contractual partners are obligated to work out approaches to solutions within one business day after the problem has occurred. Supplier has to ensure that short-term access to resources for fault analysis is possible at any time. The procedure for the handling of complaints is stipulated as follows: - 2 working days at the latest after receipt of <information/parts> (or pictures, defect samples, respectively), acknowledgement of receipt has to be sent to juwi (3D). - 15 working days at the latest after receipt of <information/parts> (if needed for a primary response), primary response has to be sent to juwi. Contents of primary response: 8D-report including section „Immediate Measures“ (5D). - 30 working days at the latest after juwi issued the complaint, a complete 8D-report has to be submitted. If this is not possible, Supplier has to report this together with a detailed interim report. This interim report also has to state when the complete 8D-report (or the next interim report, respectively) will be submitted. The period between two interim reports must not exceed 14 calendar days. This period of time (of 14 calendar days for submitting the complete 8D- report) may only be prolonged on the basis of detailed interim reports Final fault analysis reports have to be meaningful, coherent and complete with regard to contents. The reporting format has to be that of the 8D-report.
Quality Problems. (a) Without prejudice to Distributor taking the necessary and reasonable steps to minimise damage to the public or its consumers, within 2 days of arrival of the Products at the Delivery Point, Distributor must inspect the Products and reject any Products that have visibly apparent Material Quality Problems by providing Supplier with written notice (Material Quality Problems Notice) of its rejection including written evidence (to the satisfaction of Supplier) of the Material Quality Problems.‌ (b) On receipt of the Material Quality Problems Notice, Supplier must review the notice and notify Distributor in writing whether it accepts or rejects the notice and, if rejected, provide written reasons for its rejection. (c) If Supplier accepts the Material Quality Problems Notice, or it is determined through dispute resolution that the Products have Material Quality Problems, then Supplier will, at Supplier’s election: (i) supply replacement Products that satisfy the Specifications and that are free of any Material Quality Problems as soon as practicable; or (ii) refund all payments made by Distributor for the Products that are determined to have Material Quality Problems. (d) If Supplier rejects the Material Quality Problems Notice, then the parties will resolve any dispute in relation to any Material Quality Problems in accordance with the dispute resolution process set out in clause 23. (e) If Distributor does not provide a Material Quality Problems Notice within the timeframe specified in clause 14.2(a), then the Products will be deemed to have been accepted by Distributor and the Products will be deemed not to have any Material Quality Problems. (f) Distributor must comply with any reasonable requests and directions from Supplier in relation to the return or disposal of Products that are determined to have Material Quality Problems.
Quality Problems. Tenaris shall cooperate to resolve problems Licensee may have in complying with Tenaris Premium Connection standards and specifications of quality. In the event Tenaris Premium Connections that are Threaded or Reconstructed by Licensee fail to comply with the Tenaris Premium Connections standards and specifications of quality, then Licensee shall refrain from marketing or selling such non-conforming Tenaris Premium Connections until such time as the problems causing such non conformance are solved. In the event that Licensee fails to resolve such problems within a reasonable time after discovery of the defect, or after the time it should have discovered the defect, Tenaris may terminate this Agreement by means of a written notice to Licensee.
Quality Problems. Should Stereotaxis identify a quality issue or problem on a component or subassembly and request Supplier to implement containment action on the part failure, Supplier shall, within 3 business days after receipt of Stereotaxis' request, deliver to Stereotaxis a documented containment plan. Stereotaxis will review the proposed plan and will promptly notify Supplier of acceptance or revisions to the plan. Upon acceptance of the containment plan Supplier shall commence implementation of plan and diligently proceed with implementation of plan to completion. Supplier will substantiate this containment plan with a closed loop corrective action identifying a permanent fix. Additionally, Supplier will implement a preventative action plan, as necessary, to prevent the occurrence of a quality issue or problem on a component or subassembly.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Quality Problems. If a quality problem occurs, then the batch and production data must be accessible within one calendar day. If the problem occurred due to the product quality, the contracting parties are required to work out an approach to solve the problem within one working day after the problem has occurred. The supplier must ensure that rapid access to resources for defect examination and defect analysis is always possible. The procedure for processing complaints was agreed to and defined as follows: - No later than 1 calendar day after receiving the complaint (or photographs, defective samples), confirmation of receipt must be sent to E+E Elektronik. - No later than 2 calendar days after receiving the returned parts (if necessary for the initial response), an initial response must be sent to E+E Elektronik. Content of the initial response: 8D report, filled out up to and including the point “Immediate measures”. - No later than 14 calendar days after the complaint is issued by E+E Elektronik, a completed 8D report must be received by them. If the Supplier is not able to supply a complete 8D report within this deadline, he must report this to E+E Elektronik by a detailed interim report. This interim report must specify a deadline for submission of the complete 8D report (or for the next interim report). The time between two interim reports may not exceed 14 calendar days. The deadline (of 14 calendar days for submission of the completed 8D report) can only be extended by submitting detailed and clear interim reports. Final defect analysis reports must include specific, plausible and complete information. The 8D report is the default method for reporting. If the Supplier is not able to reach the agreed quality level within the agreed deadline, E+E Elektronik can require the support of an external consultant at the expense of the supplier.

Related to Quality Problems

  • Problems To endeavour to resolve in a fair and just manner any problems, grievances or difficulties which may be encountered while you volunteer with us;

  • Problem Solving Employees and supervisors are encouraged to attempt to resolve on an informal basis, at the earliest opportunity, a problem that could lead to a grievance. If the matter is not resolved by informal discussion, or a problem-solving meeting does not occur, it may be settled in accordance with the grievance procedure. Unless mutually agreed between the Employer and the Union problem-solving discussions shall not extend the deadlines for filing a grievance. The Union Xxxxxxx or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area Xxxxxxx, or Chief Xxxxxxx, either with the employee or alone, shall present to the appropriate supervisor a written request for a meeting. If the supervisor agrees to a problem- solving meeting, this meeting shall be held within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt of the request. The supervisor, employee, Union Xxxxxxx, and up to one (1) other management person shall attempt to resolve the problem through direct and forthright communication. If another member of management is present that person will not be hearing the grievance at Step Two, should it progress to that Step. The employee, the Union Xxxxxxx or in their absence, the Local Union President, or Area Xxxxxxx, or Chief Xxxxxxx, may participate in problem-solving activities on paid time, in accordance with Article 31, Union Rights, Section 1H.

  • Product Complaints Subdistributor shall promptly notify Distributor of (but in no event later than 24 hours after receipt), and provide, upon Distributor’s request, reasonable assistance to address and investigate, any complaint or adverse claim about any Product or its use of which Subdistributor becomes aware;

  • Product Warnings As of the Effective Date, all Products CORE sells and/or distributes for sale in California which do not qualify as Reformulated Products, will bear a clear and reasonable warning pursuant to this Section. CORE further agrees that the warning will be prominently placed with such conspicuousness when compared with other words, statements, designs or devices as to render it likely to be read and understood by an ordinary individual under customary conditions of use. For purposes of this Settlement Agreement, a clear and reasonable warning for the Products shall consist of a warning affixed directly to the product or product packaging, label, or tag, for Products sold in California and containing one of the following statements: WARNING: Reproductive Harm- xxx.X00Xxxxxxxx.xx.xxx OR WARNING: This product can expose you to chemicals, including DEHP, which are known to the State of California to cause birth defects or other reproductive harm. For more information go to xxx.X00Xxxxxxxx.xx.xxx

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Telepak Networks will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Telepak Networks must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non-designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Telepak Networks will be required to provide the results of the Telepak Networks test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop. 2.1.6.2 Once Telepak Networks has isolated a trouble to the BellSouth provided Loop, and had issued a trouble report to BellSouth on the Loop, BellSouth will take the actions necessary to repair the Loop if a trouble actually exists. BellSouth will repair these Loops in the same time frames that BellSouth repairs similarly situated Loops to its End Users. 2.1.6.3 If Telepak Networks reports a trouble on a non-designed or designed Loop and no trouble actually exists, BellSouth will charge Telepak Networks for any dispatching and testing (both inside and outside the CO) required by BellSouth in order to confirm the Loop’s working status. 2.1.6.4 In the event BellSouth must dispatch to the end-user’s location more than once due to incorrect or incomplete information provided by Telepak Networks (e.g., incomplete address, incorrect contact name/number, etc.), BellSouth will xxxx Xxxxxxx Networks for each additional dispatch required to repair the circuit due to the incorrect/incomplete information provided. BellSouth will assess the applicable Trouble Determination rates from BellSouth’s FCC or state tariffs.

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Delays and Complaints Delivery delays and service complaints will be monitored on a continual basis. Documented inability to perform under the conditions of the contract, via the Complaint to Vendor process (PUR 7017 form) contemplated for this Contract, may result in default proceedings and cancellation.

  • Quality All products will be new and unused. All products provided by the Contractor must meet all federal, state, and local standards for quality and safety requirements. Products not meeting the requirements of this section will be deemed unacceptable and returned to the Contractor for credit at no charge to the State.

  • Quality Management System Supplier hereby undertakes, warrants and confirms, and will ensue same for its subcontractors, to remain certified in accordance with ISO 9001 standard or equivalent. At any time during the term of this Agreement, the Supplier shall, if so instructed by ISR, provide evidence of such certifications. In any event, Supplier must notify ISR, in writing, in the event said certification is suspended and/or canceled and/or not continued.

  • Quality Control A. Controlled Affiliate agrees to use the Licensed Marks and Name only in connection with the licensed services and further agrees to be bound by the conditions regarding quality control shown in attached Exhibit A as they may be amended by BCBSA from time-to-time. B. Controlled Affiliate agrees to comply with all applicable federal, state and local laws. C. Controlled Affiliate agrees that it will provide on an annual basis (or more often if reasonably required by Plan or by BCBSA) a report or reports to Plan and BCBSA demonstrating Controlled Affiliate’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement including but not limited to the quality control provisions of this paragraph and the attached Exhibit A. D. Controlled Affiliate agrees that Plan and/or BCBSA may, from time-to-time, upon reasonable notice, review and inspect the manner and method of Controlled Affiliate’s rendering of service and use of the Licensed Marks and Name. E. As used herein, a Controlled Affiliate is defined as an entity organized and operated in such a manner, that it meets the following requirements: (1) A Plan or Plans authorized to use the Licensed Marks in the Service Area of the Controlled Affiliate pursuant to separate License Agreement(s) with BCBSA, other than such Controlled Affiliate’s License Agreement(s), (the “Controlling Plan(s)”), must have the legal authority directly or indirectly through wholly-owned subsidiaries to select members of the Controlled Affiliate’s governing body having not less than 50% voting control thereof and to: (a) prevent any change in the articles of incorporation, bylaws or other establishing or governing documents of the Controlled Affiliate with which the Controlling Plan(s) do(es) not concur; (b) exercise control over the policy and operations of the Controlled Affiliate at least equal to that exercised by persons or entities (jointly or individually) other than the Controlling Plan(s); and Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in (a) through (b) hereof, the Controlled Affiliate’s establishing or governing documents must also require written approval by the Controlling Plan(s) before the Controlled Affiliate can: (i) change its legal and/or trade names; (ii) change the geographic area in which it operates; (iii) change any of the type(s) of businesses in which it engages; (iv) create, or become liable for by way of guarantee, any indebtedness, other than indebtedness arising in the ordinary course of business; (v) sell any assets, except for sales in the ordinary course of business or sales of equipment no longer useful or being replaced; (vi) make any loans or advances except in the ordinary course of business; (vii) enter into any arrangement or agreement with any party directly or indirectly affiliated with any of the owners or persons or entities with the authority to select or appoint members or board members of the Controlled Affiliate, other than the Plan or Plans (excluding owners of stock holdings of under 5% in a publicly traded Controlled Affiliate); (viii) conduct any business other than under the Licensed Marks and Name; (ix) take any action that any Controlling Plan or BCBSA reasonably believes will adversely affect the Licensed Marks and Name. In addition, a Plan or Plans directly or indirectly through wholly owned subsidiaries shall own at least 50% of any for-profit Controlled Affiliate. (2) A Plan or Plans authorized to use the Licensed Marks in the Service Area of the Controlled Affiliate pursuant to separate License Agreement(s) with BCBSA, other than such Controlled Affiliate’s License Agreement(s), (the “Controlling Plan(s)”), have the legal authority directly or indirectly through wholly-owned subsidiaries to select members of the Controlled Affiliate’s governing body having more than 50% voting control thereof and to: (a) prevent any change in the articles of incorporation, bylaws or other establishing or governing documents of the Controlled Affiliate with which the Controlling Plan(s) do(es) not concur; (b) exercise control over the policy and operations of the Controlled Affiliate. In addition, a Plan or Plans directly or indirectly through wholly-owned subsidiaries shall own more than 50% of any for-profit Controlled Affiliate.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!