Scenario C definition

Scenario C. With respect to the “Other Assignment,”if the operator can’t work that “Other Assignment”as well but fails to provide at least 60 minutes’notice, or fails for any reason to report to the depot office or the designated location within 5 minutes before their scheduled report time for the “Other Assignment,”the operator will be assessed a miss for that “Other Assignment”and the prior Operator Late Arrival (OLA) will be erased.
View Source
Scenario C. The Consolidated Company’s Trailing Twelve Month’s Earnings is $60,000,000 as of the First Vesting Date, $50,000,000 as of the Second Vesting Date and $40,000,000 as of the Third Vesting Date. The resulting Performance Ratio at each Vesting Date is: First Vesting Date: $60,000,000 / $50,000,000 = 1.2 (deemed to be 1.0) Second Vesting Date: $50,000,000 / $50,000,000 = 1.0 Third Vesting Date: $40,000,000 / $50,000,000 = 0.8 Because the Shortfall Date occurs as of the Third Vesting Date, the provisions of Section 2.2 are unavailable to determine whether the additional Shares shall vest, as prior period performance is not considered for purposes of Section 2.2. That is, regardless of an excess over $50,000,000 for the Trailing Twelve Month’s Earnings at the First Vesting Date, this excess cannot be used to calculate subsequent Catch-Up Ratios under Section 2.2. Therefore, the portion of Shares that did not vest at the Third Vesting Date (20.0% of one third) remain unvested. 100.0% of one third of the Shares will have vested at each of the First and Second Vesting Date and 80.0% of one third of the Shares will become Vested Shares at the Final Vesting Date.
View Source
Scenario C. The Consolidated Company’s Trailing Twelve Month's Economic Earnings is $80,000,000 for the twelve-month period ending on the First Vesting Date, $70,000,000 for the twelve-month period ending on the Second Vesting Date, and $60,000,000 for the twelve-month period ending on the Third Vesting Date. The resulting Performance Ratio at each Vesting Date is: First Vesting Date: $80,000,000 / $70,000,000 = 1.143 (deemed to be 1.0) Second Vesting Date: $70,000,000 / $70,000,000 = 1.0 Third Vesting Date: $60,000,000 / $70,000,000 = 0.857 Section 2.3(b) provides for excess Trailing Twelve Month's Economic Earnings in a prior period to be carried forward to a later period or backward to an earlier period. Accordingly, an excess over $70,000,000 for the Trailing Twelve Month's Economic Earnings for the twelve-month period ending on the First Vesting Date can be used to calculate subsequent Catch-Up Ratios under Section 2.3(b). Thus, at the Third Vesting Date, and since the Performance Ratio was achieved at the Second Vesting Date, $10,000,000 of the Trailing Twelve Month's Economic Earnings of the Consolidated Company for the twelve-month period ending on the First Vesting Date would be applied to the Trailing Twelve Month's Economic Earnings of the Consolidated Company for the twelve-month period ending on the Third Vesting Date, as follows: Excess of Trailing Twelve Month's Economic Earnings for the twelve-month period ending on the First Vesting Date over $70,000,000: $80,000,000 - $70,000,000 = $10,000,000 $60,000,000 + $10,000,000 = $70,000,000 $70,000,000 / $70,000,000 = 1.0 Resulting in a Catch-Up Ratio applicable to the Third Vesting Date of 1.0.
View Source

Examples of Scenario C in a sentence

  • In Scenario C, Authority A is still delivering more than the proportion of the total contract capacity to which it is entitled by reason of its current population.

  • Scenario C • A successful car rental company (A) has several clients who lease large fleets of cars.

  • CSG shall meet the Recovery Time Objectives and Recovery Point Objectives in the three following Recover Timeframes tables (Scenario A, Scenario B, and Scenario C):* Execution Copy ****** *********** ** ***** **** ** **** ********** ******** *********** (** **) *** ***** ***** ******** *** ********* ** ***** **** ** **** Example: Should three GBs of financial data be lost, CSG’s recovery time objective would be 12 hours (3 GB x 4 hours = 12).

  • Factoring activities in Scenario C • Assignment of debts from C to A under a recourse arrangement.

  • In addition, ACS may terminate this Agreement at any time upon ▇▇▇▇ty (90) days prior written notice to Cook if the clinical results of the development of the First Product ▇▇▇▇s within Scenario C as set forth in Section 3.9; provided such notice shall be given to Cook within thirty (30) days after ACS receives notice of the foregoi▇▇ ▇vent.

  • CSG shall meet the Recovery Time Objectives and Recovery Point Objectives in the three following Recover Timeframes tables (Scenario A, Scenario B, and Scenario C):* ****** *********** ** ***** **** ** **** ********** ******** *********** *** *** *** ***** ***** ******** *** ********* ** ***** **** ** **** Example: Should ***** *** of financial data be lost, CSG’s recovery time objective would be ** ***** (* ** * * ***** * **).

  • Industrial Use (Scenario C) Only: The Property currently meets the department standards for restricted industrial use (Property Use C) and, based on reports on file at the department offices in Jefferson City, Missouri, the contaminants present pose no significant present or future risk to human health or the environment based on restricted industrial use of the Property.

  • For purposes of such comparison, it shall be assumed that (a) CCPN would (i) receive 100% of the Pediatric Pool Surplus, (ii) reimburse HMO for 25% of the Adult Pool Deficit, and (iii) receive 25% of the Profit Product Pool Total (the net result, the "Assumed Net CCPN Share (Scenario C)"), and (b) HMO would (i) absorb 75% of the Adult Pool Deficit, and (ii) retain 75% of the Profit Product Pool Total (the net result, the "Assumed Net HMO Share (Scenario C)").

  • Scenario C resembles Scenario B until 2030, after which the growth rate of this technology is significantly reduced.

  • As shown in “Studied Scenarios” section above, Scenario A has lower building height than Scenarios B and C, as well as slimmer overall building bulk as compared with Scenario C.


More Definitions of Scenario C

Scenario C. The parties sign an agreement of sale which contains a suspensive condition. Prior to the agreement lapsing, the parties either waive the suspensive condition or extend the time for its fulfilment by signing an addendum.
View Source
Scenario C. We would like to identify all individuals who work as IT/IM Infrastructure Analysts within the specific skill set of UNIX. We have come up with 10 companies in London. We would like you to suggest a further 5 companies and map the departments. We estimate there to be 25 per business. We would like the mapping to include names and current job titles and expect this information to live and people qualified but not approached. Scenario D: We would like to map 10 Rail Engineering companies in Western Europe for specific rail engineers. We estimate there to be 25 per business at various levels. We would like all individuals to be approached and to find out if they would be interested in working at Transport for London.
View Source
Scenario C. All initial values in 𝑃 are 0, all initial values in 𝑅 are 1 and processes of 𝑄 are Byzantine. These Byzantine processes behave with respect to those in 𝑃 exactly as they do in Scenario A and with respect to those in 𝑅 exactly as they do in Scenario B. Messages sent from 𝑃 ∪ 𝑄 to 𝑃 ∪ 𝑄 are delivered in time 1, as well as the ones from 𝑅 ∪ 𝑄 to 𝑅 ∪ 𝑄, while the ones from 𝑃 ∪𝑅 to 𝑃 ∪𝑅 are delivered in a time greater than max(𝑇𝐴, 𝑇𝐵).
View Source
Scenario C. All initial values in P are 0, all initial values in R are 1 and processes of Q are Byzantine. These Byzantine processes behave with respect to those in P exactly as they do in Scenario A and with respect to those in R exactly as they do in Scenario B. Messages sent from P ∪ Q to P ∪ Q are delivered in time 1, as well as the ones from R∪ Q to R∪ Q, while the ones from P∪ R to P∪ R are delivered in a time greater than max(TA, TB). Theorem 6 (Theorem 1). In a partially synchronous system, no algorithm solves both the Byzantine consensus problem
View Source

Related to Scenario C

  • Qualifying Energy Efficiency Measures (EEMs) means either (i) standard gas or electric EEMs (i.e., measures found on any of the Standard Initiative applications); or (ii) measures eligible under the Custom Initiative approved by Ameren Illinois; or (iii) measures found in the Streetlighting or Retro-commissioning Initiative as identified in official program materials found on the Ameren Illinois Energy Efficiency website. The following technologies are not Qualifying EEMs: (i) technologies that do not demonstrate measurable and verifiable energy savings, including power conditioning; (ii) technologies that displace electrical energy use or natural gas to another fuel (i.e. fuel switching); or (iii) renewable energy projects (solar, wind power, etc.). Eligible gas measures do not include propane or butane measures.

  • Single Phase Aerosol Air Freshener means an aerosol air freshener with the liquid contents in a single homogeneous phase and which does not require that the product container be shaken before use.

  • Sound level meter means an instrument which includes a microphone, amplifier, RMS detector, integrator or time averager, output meter, and weighting networks used to measure sound pressure levels.

  • Treatability study means a study in which a hazardous waste is subjected to a treatment process to determine: (1) Whether the waste is amenable to the treatment process, (2) what pretreatment (if any) is required, (3) the optimal process conditions needed to achieve the desired treatment, (4) the efficiency of a treatment process for a specific waste or wastes, or (5) the characteristics and volumes of residuals from a particular treatment process. Also included in this definition for the purpose of the § 261.4 (e) and (f) exemptions are liner compatibility, corrosion, and other material compatibility studies and toxicological and health effects studies. A “treatability study” is not a means to commercially treat or dispose of hazardous waste.

  • Broadband level means all positions sufficiently similar in knowledge, skills, and abilities, and sufficiently similar as to kind or subject matter of work, level of difficulty or responsibilities, and qualification requirements of the work, to warrant the same treatment as to title, pay band, and other personnel transactions.