Accreditation Decisions Clause Samples
The Accreditation Decisions clause defines the process and authority by which an organization or individual is granted, denied, or revoked accreditation status. Typically, this clause outlines the criteria for making accreditation determinations, the responsible decision-making body, and any procedures for notification or appeal. For example, it may specify that a review committee evaluates compliance with set standards before issuing a decision, and that applicants are informed in writing of the outcome. The core function of this clause is to ensure transparency and consistency in how accreditation status is awarded or withdrawn, thereby maintaining the integrity of the accreditation process.
Accreditation Decisions. 5.1 During the accreditation decision process, the Accreditation Decision Maker(s) carefully consider:
a) The practice’s accreditation compliance history;
b) The assessment team’s assessment findings; and
c) Any material supplied by the practice in support of demonstrating compliance.
5.2 Following analysis of the surveyors’ assessment and any supporting materials, including corrective actions where required, the practice will be awarded one of two accreditation decisions: Accredited or Not Accredited.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. State consultants from TSPC and other observers are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of Oregon providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the TSPC Executive Director through the Director of Program Approval. All decisions for state unit approval are within the sole authority of TSPC and the decision to approve or not approve a provider will be made independent of any AAQEP determinations regarding its accreditation of the provider. The parties agree that the rules and standards for program and unit approval in Oregon are subject to change at any time by the Oregon Legislature or TSPC, and such rules, as amended, would govern the decision for TSPC’s ultimate approval of providers. Throughout the term of this agreement, in order to maintain accreditation, providers must comply with AAQEP policies, including submission of annual reports. If the AAQEP Accreditation Committee issues a decision to deny or revoke accreditation, the provider will have a right to petition for an appeal, consistent with the AAQEP Appeals Policy (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/appeals-policy). If an Oregon provider petitions for the appeal of a decision of the Accreditation Committee, AAQEP will notify TSPC that such petition has been received.
Accreditation Decisions. Following analysis of the auditor’s assessment, the Practice will be awarded one of two accreditation decisions: Accredited or Not Accredited.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. Observers from HTSB are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of Hawaii providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the HTSB Executive Director or designee as noted in Section 8 below.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. Accreditation status is granted for a term of seven years, contingent on the completion of annual reports and any other required reports. Initial accreditation status is granted for a term of five years, contingent on the completion of annual reports and any other required reports. Observers from MSDE are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of MD providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the representative of the Division of Educator Effectiveness at MSDE electronically.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. Observers from the Department are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of New Jersey providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the Department.
Accreditation Decisions. 5.1 Following analysis of the surveyors’ assessment, the Practice will be awarded one of three accreditation decisions: Accreditation, Conditional Accreditation or Non Accreditation. Version: 6.1 Page | 2 Created: 01July2017
Accreditation Decisions. CABC accreditation decisions are defined and compared to each other in a separate document, called “CABC Accreditation Decisions,” which is included in the CABC Accreditation Kit. REQUIREMENTS: Some CABC decisions include detailed requirements. The Birth Center must meet all requirements outlined in its Decision Letter and provide documentation to the CABC by the date specified. Failure to submit documentation and/or schedule a return visit by the required date will lead to denied accreditation. RIGHT TO APPEAL: When the CABC decision is to defer or deny accreditation, the Birth Center has a right to submit an appeal within 30 days of the decision and request a review by a second CABC panel. DECISION LETTERS: CABC Decision Letters are addressed to the Birth Center. CABC does not publish its Decision Letters to anyone else. Accreditation is required by some state regulators and health care insurance companies. These entities may request or require the Birth Center to submit its CABC Decision Letter and Status Report, which shows that any requirements have been met. The CABC encourages the Birth Center to comply with these requests. When there is an accreditation extension or delay and the Birth Center’s state license relies on CABC accreditation, CABC will inform state regulators of: An extension granted by CABC or CABC’s reason for delay (e.g.- site visit delayed due to death in the family of CABC representative doing the site visit); and The date a Decision Letter has been sent. CABC ENROLLED BIRTH CENTER DEFINITION: An Enrolled Birth Center participates in CABC’s monthly subscription system and is dedicated to the accreditation process. EBC eligibility requirements: A Birth Center is currently CABC-accredited on the 3-year accreditation schedule; and All enrollment forms have been received by CABC if using Automated Clearing House Direct Payments. PRIVILEGES OF CABC ENROLLED BIRTH CENTERS: As long as the Birth Center remains accredited and is making on-time subscription payments as an Enrolled Birth Center, the following privileges are granted by CABC: The Birth Center is listed on CABC’s website as a CABC-accredited birth center for verification purposes. The Birth Center will receive: The updated version of the CABC Accreditation Kit; One site visit at the Birth Center every three years, with: Site Visit travel, lodging and meals paid by CABC; And CABC panel review and decision; And CABC review of two Interim Status Reports submitted by the Birth Cente...
Accreditation Decisions. 1.4.1 Following analysis of the surveyor’s assessment, the Village will be awarded one of two accreditation decisions: Accredited or Not Accredited.
1.4.2 If the Village has not been granted accreditation, a period of three (3) months is provided to allow the Village to submit any outstanding evidence to QIP. Upon review and verification of this evidence, QIP will then advise the Village of the reviewed accreditation decision. If the Village does not agree with the accreditation decision the Village may apply for reconsideration of the accreditation decision.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at ▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. Observers from [SEA] are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of [State] providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the designated office at [SEA], which for purposes of this agreement is: [SEA Colleagues: Please specify your preferred communication protocol.]