Accreditation Decisions. 5.1 During the accreditation decision process, the Accreditation Decision Maker(s) carefully consider:
a) The practice’s accreditation compliance history;
b) The assessment team’s assessment findings; and
c) Any material supplied by the practice in support of demonstrating compliance.
5.2 Following analysis of the surveyors’ assessment and any supporting materials, including corrective actions where required, the practice will be awarded one of two accreditation decisions: Accredited or Not Accredited.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. State consultants from TSPC and other observers are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of Oregon providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the TSPC Executive Director through the Director of Program Approval. All decisions for state unit approval are within the sole authority of TSPC and the decision to approve or not approve a provider will be made independent of any AAQEP determinations regarding its accreditation of the provider. The parties agree that the rules and standards for program and unit approval in Oregon are subject to change at any time by the Oregon Legislature or TSPC, and such rules, as amended, would govern the decision for TSPC’s ultimate approval of providers. Throughout the term of this agreement, in order to maintain accreditation, providers must comply with AAQEP policies, including submission of annual reports. If the AAQEP Accreditation Committee issues a decision to deny or revoke accreditation, the provider will have a right to petition for an appeal, consistent with the AAQEP Appeals Policy (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx/appeals-policy). If an Oregon provider petitions for the appeal of a decision of the Accreditation Committee, AAQEP will notify TSPC that such petition has been received.
Accreditation Decisions. Following analysis of the auditor’s assessment, the Practice will be awarded one of two accreditation decisions: Accredited or Not Accredited.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. Observers from HTSB are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of Hawaii providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the HTSB Executive Director or designee as noted in Section 8 below.
Accreditation Decisions. 5.1 Following analysis of the surveyors’ assessment, the Practice will be awarded one of three accreditation decisions: Accreditation, Conditional Accreditation or Non Accreditation.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. Observers from the EPSB are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of Kentucky providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the EPSB.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission. Accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP’s Guide and policy documents, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. Accreditation status is granted for a term of seven years, contingent on the completion of annual reports and any other required reports. Initial accreditation status is granted for a term of five years, contingent on the completion of annual reports and any other required reports. Observers from AZ are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of AZ providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission’s rationale for each decision, will be shared with the ADE.
Accreditation Decisions. AAQEP accreditation decisions are made by the AAQEP Accreditation Commission accreditation statuses and terms are detailed in AAQEP's Guide and policy documents, available at xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx. Full accreditation is for a term of 7 years. Observers from IDOE are welcome to attend meetings of the Accreditation Commission at which cases of Indiana providers are considered (meetings are typically conducted via video conference). Accreditation decisions, including the reports on which decisions are based and the Accreditation Commission's rationale for each decision, will be shared with the designated office at IDOE, which for purposes of this agreement is via email. An EPP for which the Accreditation Commission issues a decision to deny or revoke accreditation may have a right to petition for an appeal subject to the Appeals Policy. XXXx for which an appeal is denied must wait at least one calendar year after the date of the original denial or revocation before reapplying as a new EPP via the new EPP approval process outlined by the State.
Accreditation Decisions. 1.4.1 Following analysis of the surveyor’s assessment, the Village will be awarded one of two accreditation decisions: Accredited or Not Accredited.
1.4.2 If the Village has not been granted accreditation, a period of three (3) months is provided to allow the Village to submit any outstanding evidence to QIP. Upon review and verification of this evidence, QIP will then advise the Village of the reviewed accreditation decision. If the Village does not agree with the accreditation decision the Village may apply for reconsideration of the accreditation decision.
Accreditation Decisions. Following analysis of the auditor’s assessment, the Service Provider will be awarded one of three accreditation decisions: Accreditation, Conditional Accreditation or Non Accreditation.