APT Attack model Sample Clauses

APT Attack model. Despite the limitations mentioned in the previous section, one of the most referenced models is the one proposed by RSA, which is used for modelling the Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) attacks or Targeted Attacks that normally involve SE techniques [142]. However, this model also focuses most on the attack process and less on its dynamics or the victims. The APT model, depicted in Figure 26, is probably the most common cyber-attack model, which include Social Engineering as core part. APTs are targeted attacks, which mean that there is a well-defined goal and victims are specially selected. The goal is typically used to obtain critical information, which can be valuable itself (e.g. Intellectual Property, or digital money), or may enable further attacks (e.g. knowledge on internal procedures, that could allow effective fraud schema). This kind of attacks are mainly built to circumvent the existing technological countermeasures, obtain privileged access to the company infrastructure and then expand in order to reach the final goal. There are a lot of examples regarding this kind of attacks, which are different for exploits or attack vectors, but they all have something in common: the core part of the attack is related to Social Engineering. In order to obtain a privileged access inside the company network, attackers exploit humans deceiving them to conduct a dangerous behaviour. The combination of technological and “social” attack vectors with certain techniques makes APTs really dangerous, as a matter of fact, all kind of companies can be potentially targeted: even RSA, one of the most famous information security firms [143]. In this particular example, it is interesting how the analysis outlines a possible typical attack model that begins with a social engineering attack and ends with the data exfiltration. 53 For example. X. Xxxxxxx, X. Xx, X. Chan, and Y.-X. Tian, “Social engineering in social networking sites: Affect- based model,” presented at the 8th International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions (ICITST-2013), Dec-2013. Figure 26 describes an Advanced Persistent Threat model with further information than the one proposed from RSA, it also includes specific phases executed before the SE attack itself with the purpose of retrieving specific information in order to create a highly contextualized and potential effective attack [144].
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to APT Attack model

  • MSAA Indicator Technical Specification Document This Agreement shall be interpreted with reference to the MSAA Indicator Technical Specifications document.

  • Contract Task Order A-E shall be assigned work via a task order by COUNTY which shall subsequently be referred to as the “Contract Task Order” (hereinafter “CTO”). A CTO for each project shall be developed by A-E in conjunction with COUNTY Project Management staff. The COUNTY Project Manager shall manage all A-E’s work including monitoring the CTO work schedule, quality of deliverables, review of invoiced amounts, adherence to set budget, and internal review of submittal packages. A-E shall follow all requirements as outlined in the CTO; this general Scope of Work, the project specific Scope Statement, and the Architect-Engineer Guide (Rev July 2018). The CTO shall include a detailed Scope Statement, describing tasks to be performed with a specific list of deliverables for each task, schedule of work and cost to complete the work. The schedule of work shall allow enough time for meetings with COUNTY Management staff to review the work progress, provide technical and policy direction, resolve problems and ensure adherence to the work completion schedule. The CTO shall include a cover sheet provided by COUNTY Project Management staff with the appropriate signature blocks and contract information. Once both Parties agree, and all Parties have signed the CTO, COUNTY Management staff shall provide A-E with a Notice to Proceed (NTP) to begin work. A-E shall submit all plans, reports and other documents produced under the CTO to the assigned COUNTY Project Manager within the timeframe indicated in the CTO or as directed by COUNTY Project Management staff.

  • Task Order X19.5 The Contractor submits a Task Order programme to the Service Manager within 2 days of receiving the Task Order Z The additional conditions of contract are Z1 to Z11 always apply. Z1 Cession delegation and assignment

  • Purchase Order Flip via Ariba Network (AN) The online process allows suppliers to submit invoices via the AN for catalog and non- catalog goods and services. Contractors have the ability to create an invoice directly from their Inbox in their AN account by simply “flipping” the purchase order into an invoice. This option does not require any special software or technical capabilities. For the purposes of this section, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider of MFMP the right and license to use, reproduce, transmit, distribute, and publicly display within the system the information outlined above. In addition, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider the right and license to reproduce and display within the system the Contractor’s trademarks, system marks, logos, trade dress, or other branding designation that identifies the products made available by the Contractor under the Contract.

  • Task Orders All orders issued hereunder are subject to the terms and conditions of this contract. The contract shall control in the event of conflict with any order. When mailed, an order shall be "issued" for purposes of this contract at the time the Government deposits the order in the mail, or, if transmitted by other means, when physically delivered to the contractor.

  • Contract Database Metadata Elements Title: Whitesville Central School District and Whitesville Central School Educational Support Staff Association (2003) Employer Name: Whitesville Central School District Union: Whitesville Central School Educational Support Staff Association Local: Effective Date: 07/01/2003 Expiration Date: 06/30/2006 PERB ID Number: 10699 Unit Size: Number of Pages: 23 For additional research information and assistance, please visit the Research page of the Catherwood website - xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/library/research/ For additional information on the ILR School - xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxxxxxx.xxx/ AGREEMENT BETWEEN WHITESVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL EDUCATIONAL SUPPORT STAFF ASSOCIATION AND THE WHITESVILLE CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT JULY 1, 2003 THROUGH JUNE 30, 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE TITLE PAGE Preamble 1 I Recognition 1 II Collective Bargaining U n i t 1 III Dues/Agency Fee Ckoffand Payroll Deduction 1 IV Rights of Employees 2 V Rights of Employer ------------- 2 VI Personnel F i l e 2 VII Employee Definitions 3 VIII Permanent Status/Seniority 4 IX Wages 5 X Overtime 7 XI Vacation 7 XII Holidays 8 XIII Sick Leave and Leavesof A b s e n c e 8 XIV Conference, Workshops,Required Courses 10 XV Meal Allowance and M i l e a g e 11 XVI Retirement 11 XVII Insurance 12 XVIII Cafeteria P l a n 14 .XIX Uniform Allowance------------------ 14 XX Hours of W o r k 14 XXI Transfers/Promotions 15 XXII Job Descriptions 15 XXIII Grievance Procedure 15 XIV Copies of the Contract 18 XV Zipper C x x x x x 18 XXVI Legislative Clause 18 XXVII Duration 19 SIGNATURES 19 APPENDIX A Grievance F o r m 20 APPENDIX B Dues Authorization F o r m 21

  • Program Components Activities and services delivered under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities, as defined in Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf) as well as with public health accountability outcome and process metrics (if applicable) as follows:

  • SHOP DRAWINGS, PRODUCT DATA AND SAMPLES 4.12.1 Shop Drawings are drawings, diagrams, schedules and other, data specially prepared for the Work by the Contractor or any Subcontractor, manufacturer, supplier or distributor to illustrate some portion of the Work.

  • Mail Order Catalog Warnings In the event that, the Settling Entity prints new catalogs and sells units of the Products via mail order through such catalogs to California consumers or through its customers, the Settling Entity shall provide a warning for each unit of such Product both on the label in accordance with subsection 2.4 above, and in the catalog in a manner that clearly associates the warning with the specific Product being purchased. Any warning provided in a mail order catalog shall be in the same type size or larger than other consumer information conveyed for such Product within the catalog and shall be located on the same display page of the item. The catalog warning may use the Short-Form Warning content described in subsection 2.3(b) if the language provided on the Product label also uses the Short-Form Warning.

  • Software Use Case Red Hat Enterprise Linux Developer Suite Subscription Services for Red Hat Enterprise Linux Developer Suite are available for Development Purposes only.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.