Archaeology Mitigation Plan Sample Clauses

Archaeology Mitigation Plan. If mitigation of an NRHP-listed, eligible, or potentially eligible archaeological site is necessary, then NASA, in consultation with the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes, shall develop a written Archaeology Mitigation Plan that outlines measures to resolve adverse effects to the site, and shall submit it electronically to the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes. The Mitigation Plan may include alternative mitigations, rather than data recovery measures, that contribute towards the public’s understanding of the historical significance of NASA-owned or -controlled archaeological resources. The Archaeology Mitigation Plan shall include a scope of work with sufficient detail that it could be used as the basis for solicitation of bids. SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes shall have 30 days to review the Archaeology Mitigation Plan and provide written comments to the Center CRM. The Center CRM shall contact the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes to confirm their intent to comment within 30 days from receipt of the Mitigation Plan. NASA will consider requests from the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes to extend the review period to 45 days. If no objection is received from the SHPO or any of the Center Consulting Tribes within the specified review period, then the Center CRM may finalize the Archaeology Mitigation Plan and submit an electronic copy to the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes. If the SHPO or any Center Consulting Tribe objects to the Archaeology Mitigation Plan, then the Center CRM shall either: 1. Convene a meeting between the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes to discuss the disagreement and work towards a consensus resolution; or 2. Forward its findings, along with the SHPO’s comments and Center Consulting Tribes’ comments, to the FPO for a decision. The FPO shall have 30 days to 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 render its binding decision, which shall be communicated in writing to the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes, copying the Center CRM.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Archaeology Mitigation Plan. If mitigation of an NRHP-listed, eligible, or potentially eligible archaeological site is necessary, then the Center CRM, in consultation with the SHPO and appropriate Center Consulting Parties, shall develop a written Archaeology Mitigation Plan that outlines measures to resolve adverse effects to the site, and shall submit it electronically to the SHPO and appropriate Center Consulting Parties, pursuant to Stipulation XXI (Handling of Sensitive Data). The Mitigation Plan may include alternative mitigations, rather than 1536 data recovery measures, that contribute towards the public’s understanding of the 1537 historical significance of NASA-owned or -controlled archaeological resources. The 1538 Archaeology Mitigation Plan shall include a scope of work with sufficient detail that it 1539 could be used as the basis for solicitation of bids. 1540 1541 SHPO and appropriate Center Consulting Parties shall have 30 days to review the 1542 Archaeology Mitigation Plan and provide written comments to the Center CRM. The 1543 Center CRM shall contact Center Consulting Tribes, if applicable, to confirm their intent 1544 to comment within 30 days from receipt of the Mitigation Plan. NASA will consider 1545 requests from the SHPO and Center Consulting Parties to extend the review period to 1546 45 days. If no objection is received from the SHPO or any of the Center Consulting 1547 Parties within the specified review period, then the Center CRM may finalize the 1548 Archaeology Mitigation Plan and submit an electronic copy to the SHPO and appropriate 1549 Center Consulting Parties. 1550 1551 If the SHPO or any Center Consulting Tribe objects to the Archaeology Mitigation Plan, 1552 then the Center CRM shall either: 1553 1554 1. Convene a meeting between the SHPO and Center Consulting Tribes to 1557 2. Notify the FPO, who will forward NASA’s findings, along with the SHPO’s
Sample 1

Related to Archaeology Mitigation Plan

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

  • Implementation of Corrective Action Plan After the Corrective Action Plan is finalized, the Purchasers shall use reasonable best efforts to implement the finalized Corrective Action Plan on the timeline set forth therein and provide periodic reports (as provided for therein) to the Sellers on the status of their implementation of the Corrective Action Plan.

  • Cooperation on forestry matters and environmental protection 1. The aims of cooperation on forestry matters and environmental protection will be, but not limited to, as follows: (a) establishing bilateral cooperation relations in the forestry sector; (b) developing a training program and studies for sustainable management of forests; (c) improving the rehabilitation and sustainable management of forest with the aim of increasing carbon sinks and reduce the impact of climate change in the Asia-Pacific region; (d) cooperating on the execution of national projects, aimed at: improving the management of forest plantations for its transformation for industrial purposes and environmental protection; (e) elaborating studies on sustainable use of timber; (f) developing new technologies for the transformation and processing of timber and non-timber species; and (g) improving cooperation in agro-forestry technologies. 2. To achieve the objectives of the Article 149 (Objectives), the Parties may focus, as a means of cooperation and negotiations on concluding a bilateral agreement on forestry cooperation between the two Parties. Such collaboration will be as follows: (a) exchanges on science and technology as well as policies and laws relating the sustainable use of forest resources; (b) cooperation in training programs, internships, exchange of experts and projects advisory; (c) advice and technical assistance to public institutions and organizations of the Parties on sustainable use of forest resources and environmental protection; (d) facilitating forest policy dialogue and technical cooperation under the Network of Sustainable Forest Management and Forest Rehabilitation in Asia- Pacific Region, initiated at the 15th Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Meeting; (e) encouraging joint studies, working visits, exchange of experiences, among others; and (f) others activities mutually agreed.

  • Implementation Plan The Authority shall cause to be prepared an Implementation Plan meeting the requirements of Public Utilities Code Section 366.2 and any applicable Public Utilities Commission regulations as soon after the Effective Date as reasonably practicable. The Implementation Plan shall not be filed with the Public Utilities Commission until it is approved by the Board in the manner provided by Section 4.9.

  • First Source Hiring Program Contractor must comply with all of the provisions of the First Source Hiring Program, Chapter 83 of the San Francisco Administrative Code, that apply to this Agreement, and Contractor is subject to the enforcement and penalty provisions in Chapter 83.

  • Staffing Plan The Board and the Association agree that optimum class size is an important aspect of the effective educational program. The Polk County School Staffing Plan shall be constructed each year according to the procedures set forth in Board Policy and, upon adoption, shall become Board Policy.

  • Management Plan The Management Plan is the description and definition of the phasing, sequencing and timing of the major Individual Project activities for design, construction procurement, construction and occupancy as described in the IPPA.

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.

  • Enterprise Information Management Standards Grantee shall conform to HHS standards for data management as described by the policies of the HHS Office of Data, Analytics, and Performance. These include, but are not limited to, standards for documentation and communication of data models, metadata, and other data definition methods that are required by HHS for ongoing data governance, strategic portfolio analysis, interoperability planning, and valuation of HHS System data assets.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!