City-level change (McLachlan Sample Clauses

City-level change (McLachlan. From a perspective of ‘experimental democracy’ this project will work with city leaders as they develop and deploy policies at the city level. This builds on our work for Greater Manchester Combined Authority (GMCA) to quantify implications of the Paris Agreement and evaluate low-carbon interventions across infrastructure, processes, and behaviours68. Drawing also on findings from Theme 2, the project will work with GMCA as it delivers its programme of immediate actions and develops its five-year city-region plan. Our research will address and support policy and project design to achieve emissions reduction from material consumption, diet, mobility, and comfort across GMCA. We will develop this work in parallel with Cardiff City Council, through co-designing interventions to encourage low-carbon travel behaviour and reduced waste. Researcher secondments in Manchester and Cardiff will enable us to observe and actively support specific activities designed to meet these city-region targets. Whilst our collaboration is primarily with city authority actors, we will also explore the web of public and private actors through which urban climate governance is defined, debated and delivered. Our attention is focussed on the role of city governance structures in facilitating or frustrating change, the influence of co-benefits and values in driving or restricting change, and the role of partnerships between the public and private sector and citizens in delivering change across a range of UK cities. In addition, specific initiatives will be evaluated in conjunction with policy-makers for different scales, delivery bodies, and users. We will draw on field notes, interviews, workshops, surveys, and quantitative performance data. A linked PhD project (Manchester) will examine and support the delivery of the GMCA ‘Springboard’ programme, which aims to make Manchester one of Europe’s leading green city-regions, comparing initiatives in each of the challenging areas. International transferability of action across cities will be explored through workshops held in three ‘Core Cities’, and an international cities webinar series to share best practice and insights.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to City-level change (McLachlan

  • Level Five Binding Arbitration (Any grievance filed on or after July 1, 2006)

  • Benefit Level Two Health Care Network Determination Issues regarding the health care networks for the 2017 insurance year shall be negotiated in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Sector Sub-Sector Industry Classification Level of Government Type of Obligation Description of Measure Source of Measure All sectors : : - : Central : National Treatment Senior Management and Board of Directors : National Treatment and the Senior Management and Board of Directors obligations shall not apply to any measure relating to small and medium sized domestic market enterprise2. Foreign equity is restricted to a maximum of 40% for domestic market enterprises with paid-in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000 Note: Members of the Board of Directors or governing body of corporation or associations shall be allowed in proportion to their allowable participation or share in the capital of such enterprises. : -1987 Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines. - Foreign Investments Act of 1991 (R.A. No. 7042, as amended by R.A. No. 8179). -Presidential and Administrative Issuances. ∞ 2 The concept of a small and medium sized domestic market enterprise is an enterprise with paid in equity capital of less than the equivalent of USD 200,000.00.

  • Level 4 An Employee at this level performs work above and beyond the skills of an Employee at Level 3.

  • Level IV a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of his/her grievance at Level III, he/she may file the grievance within five (5) days of the Level III response for transmittal to the Board.

  • Level II In the event the grievance is not resolved in Level I, the decision rendered may be appealed by the Union to the Superintendent of schools, provided such appeal is made in writing within (20) twenty days in person after receipt of the decision in Level I. If a grievance is properly appealed by the Union to the Superintendent, the Superintendent or designee shall set a time to meet regarding the grievance within fifteen days after receipt of the appeal. Within (20) twenty days after the meeting, the Superintendent or designee shall issue a decision in writing to the Union.

  • Level 2 If the grievant is not satisfied with the written answer from his/her manager the grievant may, within ten (10) days from the receipt of such answer, file a written appeal to the appointing authority. Within ten (10) days of the receipt of the written appeal the appointing authority shall investigate the grievance, which shall include a meeting with the concerned parties, and thereafter shall give a written answer to the grievant within ten (10) days.

  • Level I If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the supervisor shall give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after receipt of the written grievance.

  • Job Evaluation Plan (a) The Employer agrees that no job evaluation plan pertaining to positions covered by this Agreement will be introduced without the mutual agreement of the Parties.

  • Long Term Cost Evaluation Criterion # 4 READ CAREFULLY and see in the RFP document under "Proposal Scoring and Evaluation". Points will be assigned to this criterion based on your answer to this Attribute. Points are awarded if you agree not i ncrease your catalog prices (as defined herein) more than X% annually over the previous year for years two and thr ee and potentially year four, unless an exigent circumstance exists in the marketplace and the excess price increase which exceeds X% annually is supported by documentation provided by you and your suppliers and shared with TIP S, if requested. If you agree NOT to increase prices more than 5%, except when justified by supporting documentati on, you are awarded 10 points; if 6% to 14%, except when justified by supporting documentation, you receive 1 to 9 points incrementally. Price increases 14% or greater, except when justified by supporting documentation, receive 0 points. increases will be 5% or less annually per question Required Confidentiality Claim Form Required Confidentiality Claim Form This completed form is required by TIPS. By submitting a response to this solicitation you agree to download from th e “Attachments” section, complete according to the instructions on the form, then uploading the completed form, wit h any confidential attachments, if applicable, to the “Response Attachments” section titled “Confidentiality Form” in order to provide to TIPS the completed form titled, “CONFIDENTIALITY CLAIM FORM”. By completing this process, you provide us with the information we require to comply with the open record laws of the State of Texas as they ma y apply to your proposal submission. If you do not provide the form with your proposal, an award will not be made if your proposal is qualified for an award, until TIPS has an accurate, completed form from you. Read the form carefully before completing and if you have any questions, email Xxxx Xxxxxx at TIPS at xxxx.xxxxxx@t xxx-xxx.xxx

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!