City of Berkeley Sample Clauses

City of Berkeley. Xxxxxx further developed antitrust preemption doctrine by identifying the categories of state regulatory schemes that could be preempted by the federal antitrust laws. The deci- sion also provided guidance on the relationship between state action and antitrust preemption. The City of Berkeley enacted a city ordinance (the “Ordinance”) set- ting the maximum rent landlords could charge.75 A group of landlords owning rental property in Berkeley brought suit claiming that the Ordinance facially conflicted with the Xxxxxxx Act and therefore was preempted.76 The U.S. Supreme Court held that the federal antitrust laws did not preempt the Ordinance.77 The Court conceded that a voluntary agree- ment among Berkeley’s landlords to stabilize rent would constitute an antitrust violation, even though such an agreement would have the same economic effect as the Ordinance.78 The Court noted, however, a distinc- tion in the statutory scheme between “unilateral conduct” and “con-

City of Berkeley. For the purpose of providing effective and appropriate public safety services along Grizzly Peak Boulevard, it is recognized the City of Berkeley agrees to accept primary jurisdiction responsibility as follows: 1. All areas adjacent to Grizzly Peak Boulevard that are color coded Salmon on Attachment A, starting at 35 feet from the center line of Grizzly Peak Boulevard and beyond; and 2. All agencies to this Agreement retain the authority to provide initial or supplementary public safety services and enforcement within the City of Berkeley’s primary jurisdiction, but discovered or reported crimes requiring significant follow-up investigation should be turned over to the City of Berkeley unless otherwise mutually agreed.

City of Berkeley