Endnotes. 1 Xxxxxx, X. and Xxxxxx, M. “Why Good Authorizers Should Close Bad Schools.” Accountability in Action: A Comprehensive Guide to Charter School Closure. National Association of Charter School Authorizers (2010). Pages 6 and 9. 2 I.C. § 33‐5212 3 Xxxx, X. “Navigating the Closure Process.” Authorizing Matters Issue Brief, May 2011. National Association of Charter School Authorizers (2011). Pages 2‐3. A Conceptual Timeline for Closure Notification and Initial Steps Meet with PCSC and SDE staff Within 3 business days of the authorizer’s or school’s initial / intended closure decision, the charter school administrator and a representative of the school’s board will meet (in‐person or via telephone or web conference) with staff representatives of the PCSC and SDE to: 1. Review the remaining process for finalizing the closure decision as applicable 2. Review the Closure Protocol and tasks and clarify critical deadlines 3. Identify points of contact for media or community questions 4. Draft communication to staff, families, and affected districts School, PCSC, SDE Notify Parents / Guardians of Potential Closure 1. Within one week of the authorizer’s or school’s initial / intended closure decision, the charter school will send letters to enrolled families. Notification should include: The reasons for closure. If applicable, an explanation of the appeals process and likely timeline for a final decision. Assurance that instruction will continue through the end of the school year or an estimation of when instruction will cease. Assurance that after a final decision is reached, parents/students will be notified and assisted in the reassignment process. Public Charter School Closure FAQ. Contact information for parents/guardians with questions. School, PCSC Notify School Districts Materially Impacted 1. Within one week of the authorizer’s or school’s initial / intended closure decision, the charter school will send letters to districts materially impacted by the closure decision. Notification should include: The reasons for closure. If applicable, an explanation of the appeals process and likely timeline for a final decision. Copy of the letter sent to parents. Public Charter School Closure FAQ. Contact information for questions. School, PCSC Meet with Charter School Faculty and Staff Administrator and charter board chair meet with the faculty and staff to: 1. Discuss reasons for closure, status of appeals process (if applicable), and likely timelin...
Endnotes. No entries at date of publication. 1 Where an item is zero, please record it as such.
Endnotes. If VPSA does not purchase your local school bond on the Closing Date due to your fault, VPSA will invest, in demand or overnight investments, the amount of its bond proceeds to be used to purchase your local school bond. If you cure your failure to deliver your local school bond within the sixty (60) day period following the Closing Date, VPSA will purchase your local school bond and your bond will bear interest from the date that is fifteen days prior to the date of delivery and payment or other date satisfactory to VPSA. You will, however, be required to pay to VPSA at your actual closing an amount equal to the positive difference, if any, between (A) the amount of interest that would have accrued on your local school bond had VPSA been able to purchase your local school bond on the Closing Date and (B) the lesser of (i) the amount of interest income VPSA was able to earn, during such period, from the investment of its bond proceeds pending their use to purchase your bond and (ii) the arbitrage yield on the VPSA Bonds.
Endnotes i OBD system includes any system which monitors emission-related elements of design, or that assists repair technicians in diagnosing and fixing problems with emission-related elements of design. If a problem is detected, an OBD system should record a diagnostic trouble code, illuminate a malfunction indicator light or other warning lamp on the vehicle instrument panel, and provide information to the engine control unit such as information that induces engine derate (as provided by the OEM) due to malfunctioning or missing emission-related systems. Regardless of whether an element of design is commonly considered part of an OBD system, the term “OBD system” as used in this Appendix includes any element of design that monitors, measures, receives, reads, stores, reports, processes or transmits any information about the condition of or the performance of an emission control system or any component thereof.
Endnotes. FRDAP documentation is available at xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/lands/land-and-recreation-grants/content/frdap-assistance and/or from the Land and Recreational Grants Section, State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, XX# 000, Xxxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, 00000-0000.
Endnotes. General Information
Endnotes. National Policy and Legal Analysis Network (NPLAN). “Model Joint Use Agreement Resources: Increasing physical activity by opening up school grounds;” 2011. xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxx. org/childhood-obesity/products/nplan-joint-use-agreements. Accessed: November 1, 2011.
Endnotes. LWCF documentation is available at xxxxx://xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/lands/land-and-recreation-grants/content/land-and-water-conservation-fund-program and/or from the Land and Recreational Grants Section, State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, MS# 585, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399- 3000.
Endnotes. Except for a plea of not responsible because of a mental disease or defect (see CPL 220.15), there is no statute or case law that dictates a "uniform mandatory catechism" of questions that a judge must ask a defendant who is pleading guilty (People v Xxxxx, 21 NY2d 338, 353 [1967]). But, a "full inquiry" is to be "encouraged and highly recommended" (People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227, 242 [1974]). Also, the record must show that the plea was entered knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily, and that the defendant waived the privilege against self‑incrimination, the right to a trial by jury and the right to confront witnesses (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 243, and n 5 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]; People v Xxxxxxxxxxx, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]).
Endnotes. 1 For greater certainty, the elements “seeks to make” and “is making” in the definition of an investor are only applicable with respect to Article 5.
