Claim Review and Deficiency Process Sample Clauses

Claim Review and Deficiency Process. Within ten (10) days following the Claim Deadline, the Settlement Administrator shall determine whether each Claim Form submitted is facially valid, in that it is in the form required, includes the required affirmations and information and was submitted in a timely fashion and properly signed by a Settlement Class Member appearing on the Notice List. Full compliance with the requirements of the terms of this Agreement and the Claim Form, along with submission of Official Documentation if requested, shall be necessary for the submission of a Verified Claim Form, and the absence of any of these requirements shall invalidate the proffered claim. The Parties retain the ability to request Official Documentation should they have reasonable suspicion that the Claimant did not have valid and unexpired DACA status, and the Settlement Administrator shall verify the Official Documentation by comparing the documentation received to samples of the Official Documentation mutually agreed upon by the Parties. All such claim criteria shall be strictly enforced. Any Settlement Class Member’s failure to provide any of the required affirmation and information shall result in the putative claim being deemed invalid. Claim Forms that do not meet the requirements as set forth in this Agreement and in the Claim Form instructions shall be rejected absent agreement by the Parties on a cure process or other reasonable remedial steps. This shall include but is not limited to any failure to provide complete and accurate information, any failure to make the required representations and attestations, any failure to provide required supporting documentation if requested to do so, any failure to fully execute the Claim Form and any failure to timely submit the Claim Form and Official Documentation. The Settlement Administrator shall have the authority to determine whether the submission of a Claim Form and Official Documentation, if requested, is complete and timely. The Settlement Administrator’s determinations in this regard shall be final and non-appealable. The Settlement Administrator shall promptly send a notice to any Settlement Class Member who submits a deficient Claim, identifying the deficiency and informing the individual that Class Counsel is available to assist in addressing deficiencies. To be considered, any revised Claim Form and Official Documentation, if requested, or attempted cure of a Claim Form and Official Documentation must be mailed to the Settlement Administrato...
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Claim Review and Deficiency Process. The Settlement Administrator shall 9 validate each Claim Form as directed in Section 5 of the Settlement Agreement. Full compliance 10 with the requirements of the terms of the Settlement Agreement and the Claim Form shall be 11 necessary for the submission of a Verified Claim. The Settlement Administrator shall have the 12 authority to determine whether the submission of a Claim Form and Official Documentation, if 13 requested, is complete and timely. The Settlement Administrator’s determinations in this regard 14 shall be final and nonappealable. Any Settlement Class Member whose claim is rejected shall be 15 barred from receiving payment under the Settlement for that Claim but shall in all other respects be 16 bound by the terms of the Agreement and by this Order and Judgment.
Sample 1

Related to Claim Review and Deficiency Process

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Final Project Report Prepare a Final Project Report that addresses, to the extent feasible, comments made by the Grant Manager on the Draft Final Project Report. Submit one (1) reproducible master and an electronic copy of the final. Upload an electronic copy of the final report in pdf format to the FAAST system.

  • Claim Procedure Any Person entitled to indemnification hereunder shall (i) give prompt written notice to the indemnifying party of any claim with respect to which it seeks indemnification (provided that the failure to give prompt notice shall impair any Person’s right to indemnification hereunder only to the extent such failure has prejudiced the indemnifying party) and (ii) unless in such indemnified party’s reasonable judgment a conflict of interest between such indemnified and indemnifying parties may exist with respect to such claim, permit such indemnifying party to assume the defense of such claim with counsel reasonably satisfactory to the indemnified party. If such defense is assumed, the indemnifying party shall not be subject to any liability for any settlement made by the indemnified party without its consent (but such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed). An indemnifying party who is not entitled to, or elects not to, assume the defense of a claim shall not be obligated to pay the fees and expenses of more than one counsel for all parties indemnified by such indemnifying party with respect to such claim, unless in the reasonable judgment of any indemnified party a conflict of interest may exist between such indemnified party and any other of such indemnified parties with respect to such claim. In such instance, the conflicted indemnified parties shall have a right to retain one separate counsel, chosen by the Holders representing a majority of the Registrable Securities included in the registration if such Holders are indemnified parties, at the expense of the indemnifying party.

  • Appeals Process A. The Contractor’s appeal process shall, at a minimum:

  • Complaints Procedure 18.1 If the Client has any cause for complaint in relation to the services provided by the Company, he should file a complaint as per the Company’s Complaint Handling policy which is available on the Company’s website.

  • Claims Review Report The IRO shall prepare a Claims Review Report as described in this Appendix for each Claims Review performed. The following information shall be included in the Claims Review Report for each Discovery Sample and Full Sample (if applicable).

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

  • Claims Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌

  • Escalation Process 9.1. There will be times when the pharmacist will need additional advice or will need to escalate the patient to a higher acuity care location (e.g. back to their GP or an Urgent Treatment Centre or A&E).

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.