Clinical Methodology Sample Clauses

Clinical Methodology. The dataset used for this thesis, the REVAMP trial, was conducted between 2002 and 2006. The REVAMP trial had two twelve-week phases. Throughout the first phase, patients received antidepressant medication based on the pharmacotherapy algorithm. Response was evaluated throughout this phase and it was determined if the patient was a remitter, partial responder (PR), or non-responder (NR). Patients who achieved less than remission (NR, PR) were randomized into phase two. Remission criterion are met when the patient no longer meets the DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder for two consecutive visits occurring within weeks six through twelve, has a 24-item HAM-D total score less than eight, and has a greater than sixty percent reduction in their HAM-D total score. Throughout phase two, all subjects (patients who did not show full response in phase one) received the next step treatment in the pharmacotherapy algorithm. Along with an augmentation to their medication, they were randomized into one of the three treatment cells in a 2:2:1 ratio. The first treatment group had CBASP added along with their medication. The second treatment group had BSP added along with their medication. The third treatment group continued taking medication alone. The REVAMP trial was based at eight academic centers; patients were recruited through advertising and clinicians. To be included in the study, patients had to have depressive symptoms for more than two years without remission and a current major depression episode, defined by DSM-IV, for at least four weeks. Patients were between 18 and 75 years old, had scored at least 20 on the 24-item HAM-D at baseline, understood the requirements of the study, fluently spoke and understood English, and signed the informed consent. The response algorithm used in this study was based on empirically created algorithms such as the Texas Medication Project (Xxxxxxx, et al., 1999) and other expert approaches (Thase & Rush, When at first you don't succeed: sequential strategies for antidepressant nonresponders, 1997; Rush & Thase, Strategies and tactics in the treatment of chronic depression, 1997; Depression Guideline Panel, 1993; American Psychiatric Association, 2000). This algorithm was closely related to the algorithms used in the STAR*D study (Fava, et al., 2003). The sequence included sertraline hydrochloride and escitalopram oxalate, two selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), and newer substitutes to SSRIs such as venla...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Clinical Methodology

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver.

  • COVID-19 Protocols Contractor will abide by all applicable COVID-19 protocols set forth in the District’s Reopening and COVID-19 Mitigation Plan and the safety guidelines for COVID-19 prevention established by the California Department of Public Health and the Ventura County Department of Public Health.

  • Drug Testing Procedures a. The testing procedures and safeguards provided in this policy shall be adhered to by any laboratory personnel administering departmental drug tests.

  • Treatment Program Testing The Employer may request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the employee has been referred by the employer for chemical dependency treatment or evaluation or is participating in a chemical dependency treatment program under an employee benefit plan, in which case the employee may be requested or required to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program.

  • Claims Review Methodology a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject to the Quarterly Claims Review.‌

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Calculation methodology No adjustment in the Conversion Price need be made unless the adjustment would require an increase or decrease of at least 1% in the Conversion Price then in effect, provided that any adjustment that would otherwise be required to be made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. Except as stated in this Article VI, the Conversion Rate will not be adjusted for the issuance of Common Stock or any securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or carrying the right to purchase any of the foregoing. Any adjustments that are made shall be carried forward and taken into account in any subsequent adjustment. All calculations under Article V and Section 6.06 hereof and this Section 6.07 shall be made to the nearest cent or to the nearest 1/10,000th of a share, as the case may be.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Product Changes Vocera shall have the right, in its absolute discretion, without liability to End User, to update to provide new functionality or otherwise change the design of any Product or to discontinue the manufacture or sale of any Product. Vocera shall notify End User at least 90 days prior to the delivery of any Product which incorporates a change that adversely affects form, fit or function (“Material Change”). Vocera shall also notify End User at least 90 days prior to the discontinuance of manufacture of any Product. Notification will be made as soon as reasonably practical for changes associated with regulatory or health and safety issues.

  • Program Components Activities and services delivered under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities, as defined in Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf) as well as with public health accountability outcome and process metrics (if applicable) as follows:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.