Commission Action. Motion made by Xx. Xxxxx, seconded by Xx. Xxxxxx and unanimously approved with changes discussed. A second motion was made by Xx. Xxxxxx to approve the CCRC Proposal unanimously.
Commission Action. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013-76 for consideration of matters raised by the Notice. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal Service’s filings are consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and subpart B of 39 CFR part 3020. Comments are due no later than August 22, 2013. The public portions of the Postal Service’s filing can be accessed via the Commission’s Web site, xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx. Information concerning access to non-public material is located in 39 CFR part 3007. The Commission appoints Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx to serve as Public Representative in the above-captioned proceeding.
Commission Action. Each provision of this Agreement is in consideration and support of all the other provisions, and expressly conditioned upon acceptance by the Commission without change. In the event that the Commission fails to adopt this Agreement according to its terms by November 25, 1998, this Agreement shall be deemed withdrawn and the parties shall be free to pursue their respective positions in these proceedings without prejudice.
Commission Action. Each time the connection charge is reviewed, the Racine Waterworks Commission may decide to freeze the charge at its then-current amount until the next review, continue to increase the charge annually by the percentage change in the annual average Construction Cost Index, or increase the charge by an amount necessary to adequately recover the Future Growth Costs within the specified 20- year period. The amount of any adjusted connection charge shall be computed by a methodology substantially similar to the methodology used in the Connection Fee Report, using a rolling 10-year capital improvement plan and a recovery period that extends 10 years beyond the 10-year capital improvement plan, and shall conform to the principles of the impact fee standards set out in Subsection 66.0617(6) of the Wisconsin Statutes (2001-02), applied to this situation by analogy, as though the Racine Utility were a municipality and the Village and the other Municipal Retail Customers of the Racine Utility were developers within such municipality. If the review of the charge indicates that the Racine Utility is likely to collect substantially more than the amount of its Future Growth Costs, the Racine Waterworks Commission shall freeze the amount of the charge until the next review.
Commission Action. The Parties recommend the MPUC issue a CN and LWECS site permit for the Wind Project consistent with this Settlement and the LWECS Application, as revised.
Commission Action. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013–68 for consideration of matters raised by the Notice. Interested persons may submit comments on whether the Postal Service’s filings are consistent with 39 U.S.C. 3632, 3633, or 3642, 39 CFR part 3015, and subpart B of 39 CFR part 3020. Comments are due no later than June 25, 2013. The public portions of the Postal Service’s filing can be accessed via the Commission’s Web site, xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx. Information concerning access to non- public material is located in 39 CFR part 3007. The Commission appoints Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx to serve as Public Representative in the above captioned proceeding.
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. CP2013–68 for consideration of the matters raised by the Postal Service’s Notice.
2. Comments by interested persons in this proceeding are due no later than June 25, 2013.
3. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx to serve as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public in this docket.
4. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register.
Commission Action. If despite the foregoing process, there remains a dispute regarding the budget, PJM shall, not later than November 1, file the Market Monitor's proposed budget with the Commission for resolution of the dispute. PJM shall accompany such filing with an explanation of the nature of the dispute and any position of the PJM Board on such dispute. Any interested person may also file comments on such dispute. The fact that PJM is submitting the dispute for Commission review shall not be deemed to provide the views of the PJM Board any special weight, nor subject them to any special burden of proof. If the Commission has not taken action by December 31, the Market Monitor's proposed budget, filed by PJM, shall take effect, subject to any subsequent Commission order.
Commission Action. SECONDER: AYES: NAYS: EXCUSED:
Commission Action. Upon receiving a gas utility report and petition for
Commission Action. A. Granting the True-Up Petition is consistent with applicable law
