Consultation and Analysis Sample Clauses

Consultation and Analysis. The parties acknowledge that the Contractor was engaged through a competitive procurement process based on a set of bid documents that are intended to represent a complete set of construction documents (the “Bid Set”). Notwithstanding the characterization of the Bid Set as a complete set of documents, both parties to this Agreement acknowledge and agree that the Bid Set is likely to contain errors, omissions, ambiguities and discrepancies that are typically found in documents of this nature, and it is the intent of the Agreement to transfer the risk associated with such errors, omissions, ambiguities and discrepancies to the Contractor. Based on the preconstruction review of the Bid Set, the Contractor has confirmed the Lump Sum Price set forth herein, and the parties have agreed to liquidated damages if the Substantial Completion Date is not met.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consultation and Analysis. Section 2.1.1 Throughout the Preconstruction Phase, the Design-Builder shall schedule and attend regular meetings with the Department, representatives of DCPS and the Program Manager. In cooperation with the Department, DCPS and the Program Manager, the Design- Builder shall advance the design, conduct value engineering, constructability reviews, and provide scheduling and cost analysis for each phase of design with the goal of developing a design that meets DCPS’s programmatic, functional and aesthetic requirements and that can be built for an amount consistent with the Department’s budget for the Project, i.e., designed-to- budget. All design documents shall be prepared by duly licensed architects and engineers (hereinafter, “Architect/Engineer”).
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (5)
Consultation and Analysis. Section 2.1.1 Throughout the Preconstruction Phase, the Design-Builder shall schedule and attend regular meetings with the Department, [representatives of DPR/DCPS/Municipality ,] and the Program Manager. In cooperation with the Department, [DPR/DCPS/Municipality] and the Program Manager, the Design-Builder shall advance the design, conduct value engineering, constructability reviews, and provide scheduling and cost analysis for each phase of design with the goal of developing a design that meets [DPR/DCPS/Municipality]’s programmatic, functional and aesthetic requirements and that can be built for an amount consistent with the Department’s budget for the Project, i.e., designed-to- budget. All design documents shall be prepared by duly licensed architects and engineers (hereinafter, “Architect/Engineer”).
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to Consultation and Analysis

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Financial Conditions Section 4.01. (a) The Recipient shall maintain or cause to be maintained a financial management system, including records and accounts, and prepare financial statements in a format acceptable to the Bank, adequate to reflect the operations, resources and expenditures in respect of the Project and each Sub-project (including its cost and the benefits to be derived from it).

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Audit and Testing 4.1 The Contractor shall conduct tests of the processes and countermeasures contained in the Security Plan ("Security Tests") on an annual basis or as otherwise agreed by the Parties. The date, timing, content and conduct of such Security Tests shall be agreed in advance with the Authority.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!