Copies; Review Sample Clauses

Copies; Review. (a) At least five (5) Business Days before filing a Registration Statement or Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (whether before or after effectiveness), the Company will furnish to the Registering Stockholders copies of all such documents proposed to be filed. Such documents will be subject to the review of the Registering Stockholders. The Company will immediately amend such Registration Statement and Prospectus to include such reasonable changes as the Registering Stockholders and the Company reasonably agree should be included therein. Any Registering Stockholder requesting a change which, in its reasonable judgment, is unreasonably refused by the Company may withdraw its Registrable Securities from such Registration Statement. (b) The Company shall make available for inspection by any Registering Stockholder, any underwriter(s) participating in any disposition pursuant to a Registration Statement, and any attorney, accountant or other agent retained by any such Stockholder or underwriter (collectively, the “Inspectors”), all material financial and other records, pertinent documents and properties of the Company as shall be necessary to enable them to exercise their due diligence responsibility. The Company shall cause its officers, directors and employees to supply all material information requested by any such Inspector in connection with any such Registration Statement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Copies; Review. At least five (5) Business Days before filing a -------------- Registration Statement or Prospectus, the Company will furnish to the Holder (if the Holder is participating in such Registration Statement) (the "REGISTERING HOLDER") and the underwriters, if any, copies of all such documents proposed to be filed. Such documents will be subject to the review of the Registering Holder and such underwriters (and their respective counsel). The Company will not file any Registration Statement or any Prospectus to which the Registering Holder or the underwriters, if any, reasonably object. If the Registration Statement is a Piggyback Registration Statement relating to an underwritten Offering and the underwriters do not agree with such objection by the Registering Holder, and the Registering Holder is permitted to withdraw its Registrable Securities from such Offering, the Company can file the Piggyback Registration Statement notwithstanding such objection by the Registering Holder.
Sample 1
Copies; Review. At least five (5) Business Days before filing a Registration Statement or Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (whether before or after effectiveness), the Company will furnish to the Stockholder copies of all such documents proposed to be filed. Such documents will be subject to the review of the Stockholder. The Company will immediately amend such Registration Statement and Prospectus to include such reasonable changes as the Stockholder and the Company reasonably agree should be included therein. If the Stockholder requests a change which, in its reasonable judgment, is unreasonably refused by the Company, the Stockholder may withdraw its Registrable Securities from such Registration Statement.
Sample 1
Copies; Review. The City shall provide the employee a copy of all material placed in his/her personnel file at the time it is placed in his or her file. The employee may attach material to or rebut any material placed in his or her personnel file. The employee concerned shall have access to the personnel file at reasonable and proper times and shall have the right to request a copy of all or any part thereof.
Sample 1
Copies; Review. At least five (5) Business Days before filing a Registration Statement or Prospectus or any amendments or supplements thereto, the Company will furnish to the Registering Holders and the underwriters, if any, copies of all such documents proposed to be filed. Such documents will be subject to the review of the Registering Holders and the underwriters (and their respective counsel), and the Company will not file any Registration Statement or amendment thereto or any Prospectus or any supplement thereto to which the Registering Holders or the underwriters, if any, reasonably object; except that if the Registration Statement is a Piggyback Registration Statement relating to an underwritten Offering and the underwriters do not agree with such objection by the Registering Holders, the Company can file the Piggyback Registration Statement notwithstanding such objection by the Registering Holders.
Sample 1
Copies; Review. At least five (5) Business Days before filing a -------------- Registration Statement or Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (whether before or after effectiveness), the Company will furnish to the Holders participating in such Registration Statement (the "REGISTERING HOLDERS") and the underwriters, if any, copies of all such documents proposed to be filed. Such documents will be subject to the review of the Registering Holders and such underwriters (and their respective counsel). The Company will not file any Registration Statement or any Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (whether before or after effectiveness) to which the Registering Holders or the underwriters, if any, reasonably object.
Sample 1
Copies; Review. At least five (5) Business Days before filing a Registration Statement or Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (whether before or after effectiveness), the Company will furnish to the Stockholder Representative copies of all such documents proposed to be filed. Such documents will be subject to the review of the Stockholder Representative. The Company will not file any Registration Statement or any Prospectus or any amendment or supplement thereto (whether before or after effectiveness) to which the Stockholder Representative may reasonably object.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Copies; Review

  • Periodic Review The General Counsel shall periodically review the Procurement Integrity Procedures with OSC personnel in order to ascertain potential areas of exposure to improper influence and to adopt desirable revisions for more effective avoidance of improper influences.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • Periodic Reviews During January of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall review Executive's Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and additional benefits then being provided to Executive. Following each such review, the Company may in its discretion increase the Annual Salary, bonus, stock options, and benefits; however, the Company shall not decrease such items during the period Executive serves as an employee of the Company. Prior to November 30th of each year during the term hereof, the Board of Directors of the Company shall communicate in writing the results of such review to Executive.

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Agreement Review If, pursuant to section 25.10 (Review of Agreement) of the Bilateral Agreement, the Bilateral Agreement is reviewed after three or five years, or both, of the effective date of the Bilateral Agreement, and any changes to the Bilateral Agreement are required as a result, the Parties agree to amend the Agreement as necessary and in a manner that is consistent with such changes.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!