Corpus Considerations Sample Clauses

Corpus Considerations. Twitter is a social media outlet composed of short microblogs, each under 140 characters. Unlike Facebook, a user on Twitter can follow any other user’s activity on the site [38]. Only if a user specifically opts-out of a public profile is there a mechanic similar to friend requests on Facebook. Though this seems like a minute difference, it changes the dynamics of user interaction and behavior on the networks [18]. Processing statuses from Twitter also poses some challenges. The language used in tweets is informal and the structure of each post is often misconstructed. There are several platform specific features – re-tweets, at-replies, etc – which must be accounted for. [30]. For example, researchers must decide whether to remove the re-xtweet identifier RT, non-ASCII characters, and hashtags. Though each of these unique characteristics of a tweet might require extra effort on the part of the researcher, they also add potential value if used as meta-information [38, 54, 61]. For example, Xxxxxxx et al (2011) found that re-tweeting is a politically polarizing activity but at-mentioning users in a tweet is not [27]. Sentiment may be hard to discern because a lot of information and likely various sentiments are expressed in a relatively compressed message [15]. However, there are some advantage in using twitter data. Tweets often include emoji chosen by users. Emoji can be thought of as a source of sentiment annotation [44]. The emoji serves as a visual representation of the user’s intent which could help label messages as sarcastic or ironic, challenging feats for NLP [13, 28]. Hashtags and user tagging could also provide an immediate characterization of topics or ideas discussed in the tweet [27]. Additionally, Twitter data are extremely accessible, since tweets can be pulled from the API much easier than, for example, trying to scrape comments and blogs from across the Internet to gauge public sentiment. Therefore, although Twitter data pose some challenges, they have recently been used as measures of public opinion due to their many advantages [57, 45].
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Corpus Considerations

  • General Considerations a. All reports, drawings, designs, specifications, notebooks, computations, details, and calculation documents prepared by Vendor and presented to the Board pursuant to this Agreement are and remain the property of the Board as instruments of service.

  • Special Considerations Special considerations in determining allowability of compensation will be given to any change in a non-Federal entity's compensation policy resulting in a substantial increase in its employees' level of compensation (particularly when the change was concurrent with an increase in the ratio of Federal awards to other activities) or any change in the treatment of allowability of specific types of compensation due to changes in Federal policy.

  • RISK CONSIDERATION There are no significant risks associated with the recommendations contained within this report. This application may be considered under existing MPS policies. Community Council has the discretion to make decisions that are consistent with the MPS, and such decisions may be appealed to the N.S. Utility and Review Board. Information concerning risks and other implications of adopting the proposed development agreement are contained within the Discussion section of this report. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS No environmental implications are identified.

  • Other Considerations A. Changes to an Approved Scope of Work: The Recipient shall notify FEMA and shall require a sub-recipient to notify it immediately when a sub-recipient proposes changes to an approved scope of work for an Undertaking.

  • Tax Considerations The Company has advised Recipient to seek Recipient’s own tax and financial advice with regard to the federal and state tax considerations resulting from Recipient’s receipt of the Award and Recipient’s receipt of the Shares upon Settlement of the vested portion of the Award. Recipient understands that the Company, to the extent required by law, will report to appropriate taxing authorities the payment to Recipient of compensation income upon the Settlement of RSUs under the Award and Recipient shall be solely responsible for the payment of all federal and state taxes resulting from such Settlement.

  • Additional Considerations For each mediation or arbitration:

  • Settlement Consideration 2. In consideration of the full settlement, satisfaction, compromise and release of the Released Plaintiffs’ Claims, an aggregate $115 million in cash (the “Escrow Amount”) shall be paid on behalf of the Settling Defendants to Freeport by the D&O Carriers. The Settling Defendants shall cause the Escrow Amount to be deposited by the D&O Carriers into an interest-bearing escrow account controlled by an agreed upon representative of Plaintiffs and of the Settling Defendants (the “Escrow Account”) within fifteen (15) business days after the Stipulation is submitted to the Court. Upon the Effective Date, the Escrow Amount, together with any and all interest thereon, shall be paid to Freeport from the Escrow Account. For the avoidance of doubt, the Settling Defendants shall have no obligation to deposit any portion of the Escrow Amount into the Escrow Account but shall have an obligation to take all reasonably available steps to seek to cause the D&O Carriers to deposit the Escrow Amount into the Escrow Account.

  • Ethical Considerations The study will be conducted in accordance with ethical principles founded in the Declaration of Helsinki. The Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Independent Ethics Committee (IEC) will review all appropriate study documentation in order to safeguard the rights, safety and well-being of the subjects. The study can only be conducted at study sites where IRB/IEC approval has been obtained. The protocol, informed consent form, Investigator’s Brochure, advertisements (if applicable), and all other forms of information given to subjects will be provided to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator. In addition, reports on the progress of the study will be submitted to the IRB/IEC by the Investigator at the appropriate intervals.

  • Financial Considerations 5.1 In the event aggregate funding provided to SCDDO from county, state and/or federal sources is reduced or in any way becomes insufficient to fund this Agreement, the obligations of both SCDDO and the CSP must thereupon be: (1) reduced on a pro rata basis, or (2) renegotiated or terminated, provided that any termination of this Agreement must be without prejudice to any obligations or liabilities of the parties accrued prior to the termination.

  • MEMO OF CONSIDERATION RECEIVED on the day month and year first above written of and from the within named Purchasers the within mentioned sum of Rs. /- (Rupees only)paid as and by way of full consideration in terms of these presents. Sl. No. Details Amount (Rs) 1 By cheque no. dated 2 By cheque no. dated 3 By cheque no. dated 4 By cheque no. dated 5 By cheque no. dated 6 TDS ( ) 7 By cheque no. dated TOTAL (RUPEES ONLY) WITNESSES:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!