Cost of Corrective Action Sample Clauses

Cost of Corrective Action. If the Contractor is continuing to perform corrective action under this Section 10.14 at the same time as the Airports Authority or any successive contractor is required to perform Corrective Action, the Parties will cooperate and each perform (or, in the case of the Airports Authority, require its successive contractor to perform) corrective action of the contamination for which each is responsible. If the Contractor and Airports Authority agree that corrective action should only be performed by a single party, the corrective action will be undertaken by the party whose fractional cost is greater. If either the Contractor or the Airports Authority is performing corrective action to address contamination for which both it and the other party are responsible under this Contract, the Parties shall discuss appropriate proportionate sharing of the cost of corrective action, and shall share such costs of corrective action, with the party that is not performing the corrective action paying its share of costs to the other party performing the corrective action within 30 Days after the date invoices for such work and supporting documentation are presented by the party performing the corrective action to the other party. If the Parties are unable to agree on the appropriate proportionate sharing of the cost of corrective action, the Contractor and the Airports Authority shall hire, sharing the cost, a consultant mutually acceptable to the Airports Authority and the Contractor to assess the impact of the contamination for which the Airports Authority is responsible for under the terms of this Contract on the environmental condition of the Premises. If the Parties do not agree on a single consultant, each party, at its own cost, shall hire its own consultant, and the two consultants shall jointly select a third consultant. The consultant’s assessment must include a review of the corrective action that has been done as of the date of the new contamination for which the Airports Authority or its successor contractor is responsible under this Contract and the remaining cost to complete the Contractor’s corrective action absent this new contamination. In addition, the consultant must estimate the cost of the additional work that will be required due to this new contamination. In such case, the Contractor’s fractional cost equals the estimated cost to complete corrective action before this new contamination divided by the estimated cost to complete this corrective action ...
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Cost of Corrective Action. Except as otherwise specified in this Contract, all corrective actions to be taken by the Contractor including under this Article 12 shall be at the Contractor´s cost and expense, including all costs arising from charges for packaging, shipping, insurance, taxes, and other matters associated with corrective actions.
Sample 1

Related to Cost of Corrective Action

  • Corrective Action Despite its right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Article, the LHIN may choose not to terminate this Agreement and may take whatever corrective action it considers necessary and appropriate, including suspending Funding for such period as the LHIN determines, to ensure the successful completion of the Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.

  • Hazardous Materials; Remediation (a) If any release or disposal of Hazardous Materials shall occur or shall have occurred on any real property or any other assets of any Borrower or any other Credit Party, such Borrower will cause, or direct the applicable Credit Party to cause, the prompt containment and removal of such Hazardous Materials and the remediation of such real property or other assets as is necessary to comply with all Environmental Laws and to preserve the value of such real property or other assets. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, each Borrower shall, and shall cause each other Credit Party to, comply with each Environmental Law requiring the performance at any real property by any Borrower or any other Credit Party of activities in response to the release or threatened release of a Hazardous Material.

  • Periodic Review of Costs of Environmental Compliance In the ordinary course of its business, the Company conducts a periodic review of the effect of Environmental Laws on the business, operations and properties of the Company and its subsidiaries, in the course of which it identifies and evaluates associated costs and liabilities (including, without limitation, any capital or operating expenditures required for clean-up, closure of properties or compliance with Environmental Laws or any permit, license or approval, any related constraints on operating activities and any potential liabilities to third parties). On the basis of such review and the amount of its established reserves, the Company has reasonably concluded that such associated costs and liabilities would not, individually or in the aggregate, result in a Material Adverse Change.

  • Remedial Action A. If a represented individual has worked more than one thousand fifty (1,050) hours in the twelve (12) month period from the individual’s original date of hire, the represented individual may request remedial action from the State Human Resources Director in accordance with WAC 357-49. Following the Director’s review of the remedial action request, an individual may file exceptions to the Director’s decision in accordance with WAC 357.

  • Litigation; Regulatory Action (a) Except as set forth on Schedule 3.10 of the Company Disclosure Schedule, no litigation, claim, suit, investigation or other proceeding before any court, governmental agency or arbitrator is pending against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, and, to the Knowledge of the Company, (i) no such litigation, claim, suit, investigation or other proceeding has been threatened and (ii) there are no facts which would reasonably be expected to give rise to such litigation, claim, suit, investigation or other proceeding.

  • Litigation, Environmental and Labor Matters (a) There are no actions, suits, proceedings or investigations by or before any arbitrator or Governmental Authority pending against or, to the knowledge of the Borrower, threatened against or affecting the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries (i) as to which there is a reasonable possibility of an adverse determination and that, if adversely determined, could reasonably be expected, individually or in the aggregate, to result in a Material Adverse Effect or (ii) that involve this Agreement or the Transactions.

  • Environmental Studies Promptly conduct and complete, at Borrower’s expense, all such investigations, studies, samplings and testings as may be requested by Lender or any governmental authority relative to any substance, or any waste or by-product of any substance defined as toxic or a hazardous substance under applicable federal, state, or local law, rule, regulation, order or directive, at or affecting any property or any facility owned, leased or used by Borrower.

  • Remedial Actions In the event of Recipient’s noncompliance with section 603 of the Act, other applicable laws, Treasury’s implementing regulations, guidance, or any reporting or other program requirements, Treasury may impose additional conditions on the receipt of a subsequent tranche of future award funds, if any, or take other available remedies as set forth in 2 C.F.R. § 200.339. In the case of a violation of section 603(c) of the Act regarding the use of funds, previous payments shall be subject to recoupment as provided in section 603(e) of the Act. Hatch Act. Recipient agrees to comply, as applicable, with requirements of the Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328), which limit certain political activities of State or local government employees whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by this federal assistance. False Statements. Recipient understands that making false statements or claims in connection with this award is a violation of federal law and may result in criminal, civil, or administrative sanctions, including fines, imprisonment, civil damages and penalties, debarment from participating in federal awards or contracts, and/or any other remedy available by law.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.