Criminal Law Sample Clauses

Criminal Law. 295. The autonomous Bougainville Government will have power to:
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Criminal Law. Enforcement—(1) Ex- emption. Under the authority granted by 5 U.S.C. 552a(j)(2), Ex-Im Bank here- by exempts the system of records enti- tled ‘‘EIB–35—Office of Inspector Gen- eral Investigative Records’’ from the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (c)(4), (d)(1) through (4), (e)(1) through (3), (e)(4)(G) and (H), (e)(5), (e)(8), (f), and
Sample 1Sample 2
Criminal Law. 1. Felony
Sample 1Sample 2
Criminal Law. 5. The Law of Contract
Sample 1
Criminal Law. A justification defense for a person who acts in an emergency that he or she did not create and who commits a harm that is less severe than the harm that would have occurred but for the person's actions. • For example, a mountain climber lost in a blizzard can assert necessity as a defense to theft of food and blankets from another's cabin. — Also termed choice of evils; duress of circumstances; lesser-evils defense. See lesser-evils defense under DEFENSE(1). [Cases: Criminal Law 38. C.J.S. Criminal Law §§ 49–53.] 2.Torts. A privilege that may relieve a person from liability for trespass or conversion if that person, having no alternative, xxxxx another's property in an effort to protect life or health. “In some cases even damage intentionally done may not involve the defendant in liability when he is acting under necessity to prevent a greater evil. The precise limits of the defence are not clear, for it has affinities with certain other defences, such as act of God, self-help, duress, or inevitable accident. It is distinguishable from self-defence on the ground that this presupposes that the plaintiff is prima facie a wrongdoer: the defence of necessity contemplates the infliction of harm on an innocent plaintiff. The defence, if it exists, enables a defendant to escape liability for the intentional interference with the security of another's person or property on the ground that the acts complained of were necessary to prevent greater damage to the commonwealth or to another or to the defendant himself, or to their or his property. The use of the term necessity serves to conceal the fact that the defendant always has a choice between two evils. This is what distinguishes the defence of necessity from that of impossibility.” R.F.V. Heuston, Xxxxxxx on the Law of Torts 493 (17th ed. 1977). manifest necessity.A sudden and overwhelming emergency, beyond the court's and parties' control, that makes conducting a trial or reaching a fair result impossible and that therefore authorizes the granting of a mistrial. • The standard of manifest necessity must be met to preclude a defendant from successfully raising a plea of former jeopardy after a mistrial. [Cases: Double Jeopardy 99. C.J.S. Criminal Law § 230.] military necessity.See MILITARY NECESSITY. moral necessity.A necessity arising from a duty incumbent on a person to act in a particular way. physical necessity.A necessity involving an actual, tangible force that compels a person to act in a particular way....
Sample 1
Criminal Law. Information on criminal conduct shall be turned over to law enforcement officials. (See EBC)
Sample 1
Criminal Law. (4) Arrest and Control Techniques;
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Criminal Law. O304(1) In RFRA challenge to prosecution un- der Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, Court of Appeals would not take judicial notice of facts contained in newspaper arti- cle that golden eagles had recently been killed by power lines in Wyoming, inas- much as such facts did not satisfy require- ment that judicially noticed fact be either generally known within territorial jurisdic- tion of trial court or capable of accurate and ready determination by resort to sources whose accuracy could not reason- ably be questioned. Bald and Golden Ea- gle Protection Act, § 1, 16 U.S.C.A. § 668(a); Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993, § 3(a), 42 U.S.C.A. § 2000bb– 1(a); Fed.Rules Evid.Rule 201(b), 28 U.S.C.A.
Sample 1
Criminal Law. Special Part. According to the New Criminal Code. 2nd Ed. Bucharest: Universul Juridic. Buys, C. G. (2013). Reflections on the 50th Anniversary of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Southern Illinois University Law Journal, vol.38, 57-72. Consular Functions. (1965). In B. Sen, A Diplomat’s Handbook of International Law and Practice (pp. 227-244). The Hague, Netherlands: Springer Netherlands Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx. Dobrinoiu, V., Pascu, I., Hotca, M., Chiş, I., Gorunescu, M., Păun, C., Sinescu, M. (2012). Noul Cod penal, comentat, Partea specială, Vol II/The new Criminal Code, commented, Special Part, Vol II. Bucharest: Universul Juridic .
Sample 1

Related to Criminal Law

  • Criminal History Applicants who have criminal convictions may be denied. Any crimes associated with drugs, violence, sex, property damage, and/or weapons may be grounds for automatic disqualification. Eligibility is dependent upon the level, disposition, and time since the crime occurred. Open cases for similar crimes may be grounds for denial. Credit. A credit check will be performed, and the following may be grounds for denial: past due or dishonored debt, the absence of a credit history, unpaid housing accounts, unpaid utility accounts.

  • CRIMINAL PROVISIONS AND SANCTIONS The Contractor agrees to perform the Agreement in conformance with safeguards against fraud and abuse as set forth by the H-GAC, the State of Texas, and the acts and regulations of any related state or federal agency. The Contractor agrees to promptly notify H-GAC of any actual or suspected fraud, abuse, or other criminal activity through the filing of a written report within twenty-four (24) hours of knowledge thereof. Contractor shall notify H-GAC of any accident or incident requiring medical attention arising from its activities under this Agreement within twenty-four (24) hours of such occurrence. Theft or willful damage to property on loan to the Contractor from H-GAC, if any, shall be reported to local law enforcement agencies and H-GAC within two (2) hours of discovery of any such act. The Contractor further agrees to cooperate fully with H-GAC, local law enforcement agencies, the State of Texas, the Federal Bureau of Investigation and any other duly authorized investigative unit, in carrying out a full investigation of all such incidents. The Contractor shall notify H-GAC of the threat of lawsuit or of any actual suit filed against the Contractor pertaining to this Agreement or which would adversely affect the Contractor’s ability to perform services under this Agreement.

  • Criminal Convictions Grantee certifies that neither it nor any officer, director, partner or other managerial agent of Grantee has been convicted of a felony under the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002, nor a Class 3 or Class 2 felony under Illinois Securities Law of 1953, or that at least five (5) years have passed since the date of the conviction. Grantee further certifies that it is not barred from receiving an Award under 30 ILCS 500/50-10.5, and acknowledges that Grantor shall declare the Agreement void if this certification is false (30 ILCS 500/50-10.5).

  • Corruption 24.1.3.1 The Purchaser prohibits all unlawful payments and practices and is fully committed to the elimination of corruption in its business transactions. In addition, the Purchaser prohibitsfacilitation payments. The Supplier shall complywith all applicable laws and regulations on corruption, bribery, unlawful business activities and extortion. The Supplier shall never make or approve an unlawful payment to anyone under any circumstances. The Supplier warrants that it has not directly or indirectly paid any commission, fees or granted any rebates to any third party, employees of the Purchaser or Purchaser’s customer, or made any gifts, entertainment or any other non-monetary favours or other arrangements in violation of Alstom policy or the law. Any breach of this Article shall be considered to be a material breach.

  • Anti-Corruption Laws and Sanctions The Borrower has implemented and maintains in effect policies and procedures designed to ensure compliance by the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions, and the Borrower, its Subsidiaries and their respective officers and employees and to the knowledge of the Borrower its directors and agents, are in compliance with Anti-Corruption Laws and applicable Sanctions in all material respects. None of (a) the Borrower, any Subsidiary or any of their respective directors, officers or employees, or (b) to the knowledge of the Borrower, any agent of the Borrower or any Subsidiary that will act in any capacity in connection with or benefit from the credit facility established hereby, is a Sanctioned Person. No Borrowing or Letter of Credit, use of proceeds or other transaction contemplated by this Agreement will violate any Anti-Corruption Law or applicable Sanctions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.