Decision of Architect. Claims, including those alleging an error or omission by the Architect, shall be referred initially to the Architect for action as provided in Paragraph 4.4. A decision by the Architect, as provided in Subparagraph 4.4.4, shall be required as a condition precedent to litigation of a Claim between the Contractor and Owner as to all such matters arising prior to the date final payment is due, regardless of
(1) whether such matters relate to execution and progress of the Work or (2) the extent to which the Work has been completed. The decision by the Architect in response to a Claim shall not be a condition precedent to litigation in the event (1) the position of Architect is vacant, (2) the Architect has not received evidence or has failed to render a decision within agreed time limits, (3) the Architect has failed to take action required under Subparagraph 4.4.4 within 30 days after the Claim is made, (4) forty-five (45) days have passed after the Claim has been referred to the Architect or (5) the Claim relates to a mechanic's lien.
Decision of Architect. “Disputes” or “Claims” as defined in Article 20.9.1.1 between District and Contractor involving money or time, including those alleging an error or omission by the Architect shall be referred initially to the Architect for action as provided in Article 20.2 within ten (10) days after Contractor’s Article 17 request for extra work/ modification is denied. If there is a CM, the CM shall receive the Dispute and may review and also assemble opinions and documents to assist the Architect. A decision by the Architect, as provided in Article 20.5, shall be required as a condition precedent to proceeding with remedies set forth in Article 20.9 as to all such matters arising prior to the date Retention Payment Application is due, regardless of whether such matters relate to execution and progress of the Work, or the extent to which the Work has reached Final Completion. The condition precedent of an Architect decision shall be waived if: (1) the position of Architect is vacant; (2) the Architect has failed to take action required under Article 20.5 within the time periods required therein; or (3) the Dispute or Claim relates to a stop notice claim not arising from any extra Change Order or Immediate Change Directive for which approval has not been provided.
Decision of Architect. To the extent requested by Owner, claims, including those alleging an error or omission by the Architect but excluding those arising under Paragraphs 10.3 through 10.5, shall be referred initially to the Architect for decision. If referred to the Architect by Owner, an initial decision by the Architect shall be required as a condition precedent to mediation, arbitration or litigation of all Claims between the Contractor and Owner arising prior to the date final payment is due, unless 30 days have passed after the Claim has been referred to the Architect with no decision having been rendered by the Architect. The Architect will not decide disputes between the Contractor and persons or entities other than the Owner.
Decision of Architect. Any decisions regarding the extent to which the Leased Premises or any portion of the Project has become unfit for use shall be made by an architect, professional engineer or surveyor appointed by the Landlord, whose decision shall be final and binding upon the parties.
Decision of Architect. Any Claim may, upon written request of Owner, be referred initially to the Architect for a recommendation.
Decision of Architect. Claims shall be referred initially to Customer's Architect for decision. An initial decision by the Architect shall be required as a condition precedent to arbitration or litigation, unless 30 days have passed after the claim has been referred to the Architect, and no decision has been rendered by the Architect. i ,- . Dated Ma rc.v. lL.( ,200-'-. ~ MATTOON COMMUNITY UNIT SCHOOOl DISTRICT #2 JOHNr-c\TROLS, INC. Signature: ~Qt!Q0..~Q:l) ~~--~- Signat~ J~ t"-. ~
Decision of Architect. Claims shall be referred initially to the Architect for action as provided in Paragraph 4.8. A decision by the Architect, as provided in Subparagraph 4.8.4, shall be required as a condition precedent to litigation of a Claim between the Contractor and Owner as to all such matters arising prior to the date final payment is due. The decision by the Architect in response to a Claim shall not be a condition precedent to litigation in the event (1) the position of Architect is vacant, (2) the Architect has not received evidence or has failed to render a decision within agreed time limits, (3) the Architect has failed to take action required under Subparagraph 4.8.4 within 30 days after the Claim is made or (4) 45 days have passed after the Claim has been referred to the Architect.
Decision of Architect. Claims, including those alleging an error or omission by the Architect, shall be referred initially to the Architect for action as provided in Paragraph 4.4. A decision by the Architect and Owner, as provided in Subparagraph 4.4.4, shall be required as a condition precedent to litigation of a Claim between the Contractor and Owner as to all such matters arising prior to the date final payment is due, regardless of: (1) whether such matters relate to execution and progress of the Work, or (2) the extent to which the Work has been completed.
Decision of Architect. Claims, including those alleging an error or omission by the Contractor, but excluding those alleging an error or omission by the Architect, shall be referred initially to the Architect for action as provided in Paragraph 5.5. A decision by the Architect, as provided in Subparagraph 5.5, shall be required as a condition precedent to arbitration or litigation of a Claim between the Contractor and Owner as to only those matters arising prior to the date final payment is due and which require the interpretation of, or the determination of compliance with, the Contract Documents, regardless of (1) whether such matters relate to execution and progress of the Project Work or (2) the extent to which the Project Work has been completed. The decision by the Architect in response to a Claim shall not be a condition precedent to arbitration or litigation in the event (1) the position of Architect is vacant, (2) the Architect has not received evidence or has failed to render a decision within agreed time limits, (3) the Architect has failed to take action required under Subparagraph 5.5.2 within 10 days after the Claim is made, unless the Parties shall have agreed to the extension of such time, (4) 45 days have passed after the Claim has been referred to the Architect, (5) the Claim relates to a mechanic's lien, or (6) the Claim does not relate to the interpretation of or the compliance with the Contract Documents.
Decision of Architect. Disputes between District and Contractor involving money or time, including those alleging an error or omission by the Architect shall be referred initially to the Architect for action within ten (10) days after Contractor’s Article 17 request for Change is denied. If there is a CM, the CM shall receive the Dispute and may review and also assemble opinions and documents to assist the Architect. A decision by the Architect, pursuant to Article 20.5, shall be required as a condition precedent to proceeding with remedies set forth in Article 20.9 as to all such matters arising prior to the date Retention Payment Application is due, regardless of whether such matters relate to execution and progress of the Work, or the extent to which the Work has reached Final Completion. The condition precedent of an Architect decision shall be waived if: (1) the position of Architect is vacant;
