Design Development Documents Review Sample Clauses

Design Development Documents Review. 4.4.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, and A/E shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the Design Development Documents. 4.4.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the A/E shall revise the Design Development Documents to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting (including any comments from the Ohio Homeland Security Infrastructure Protection and Technology Unit, which have been reviewed and approved by the Owner), and resubmit those documents to the Owner and Contracting Authority. 4.4.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the revised Design Development Documents and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development Documents shall become the final Design Development Documents. 5.1 Commencement
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (13)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Development Documents Review. 4.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, and A/E shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the Design Development Documents.
Sample 1See All (4)
Design Development Documents Review. 5.5.5.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents and the CM’s Design Development Stage Submission, the Contracting Authority, Owner, A/E, and CM shall meet to discuss the submissions and reach agreement on any Owner-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, or Construction Budget and any necessary clarifications of the Design Development Documents and the CM’s Design Development Stage Submission. 5.5.5.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within five business days after the review meeting, the A/E and CM shall revise their respective Design Development submissions to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to each other, the Owner, and Contracting Authority. 5.5.5.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the revised Design Development submissions and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development submissions shall become the final Design Development Documents.
Sample 1Sample 2
Design Development Documents Review. The Contracting Authority, the Owner, and the Consultant shall meet to review the provisional Design Development Documents and to reach agreement on any Contracting Authority- or Owner-authorized adjustments to the Final Concept and Design Criteria Documents, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents. Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the Consultant shall revise its Design Development Stage submission to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to the Owner and the Contracting Authority. When the Contracting Authority and the Owner approve of the revised Design Development Stage submission and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development Stage submission shall become the final Design Development Documents. Miscellaneous Additional Services
Sample 1
Design Development Documents Review. 4.5.1 TheAfter the Contracting Authority, the and Owner, and the A/E shall meet have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, and toA/E shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents. 4.5.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the Program A/E shall revise itsthe Design Development Stage submissionDocuments to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to the Owner and the Contracting Authority.
Sample 1
Design Development Documents Review. 4.6.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, A/E, and Contractor shall meet to discuss the provisional 4.6.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 five business days after the review meeting, the A/E and Contractor shall revise their respective Design Development submissions to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting (including any comments from the Ohio Homeland Security Infrastructure Protection and Technology Unit, which have been reviewed and approved by the Owner), and resubmit those documents to each other, the Owner, and Contracting Authority. 4.6.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the revised Design Development submissions and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the revised Design Development submissions shall become the final Design Development Documents.
Sample 1
Design Development Documents Review. 4.6.1 After the Contracting Authority and Owner have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents, the Contracting Authority, Owner, A/E, and Contractor shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and the Contractor’s Design Development Stage Submission and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority-authorized adjustments to the Approved Program of Requirements, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents and Contractor’s Design Development Stage Submission. 4.6.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 five business days after the review meeting, the A/E and Contractor shall revise their respective Design Development submissions to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, jointly create a Design Development Stage package including their revised Design Development submissions, and submit the Design Development Stage package to each other, the CxA, Owner Agent (if applicable), Owner, and Contracting Authority. 4.6.3 When the Contracting Authority and Owner approve the Design Development Stage package and sign the related Design Review Acceptance form, the Design Development Stage package shall become the final Design Development Documents.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Development Documents Review. 6.3.5.1 TheAfter the Contracting Authority, the and Owner, and the Criteria A/E shall meet to have had a reasonable period to review the provisional Design Development Documents and to, the Contracting Authority, Owner, and Criteria A/E shall meet to discuss the provisional Design Development Documents and reach agreement on any Contracting Authority- or Owner-authorized adjustments to the Final Concept and Design Criteria Documents, Project Schedule, Construction Budget, or Project Budget and any necessary clarifications of the provisional Design Development Documents. 6.3.5.2 Unless the Contracting Authority agrees otherwise in writing, within 5 business days after the review meeting, the Criteria A/E shall revise itsthe Design Development Stage submissionDocuments to reflect the adjustments and clarifications agreed upon in the review meeting, and resubmit those documents to the Owner and the Contracting Authority.
Sample 1

Related to Design Development Documents Review

  • Design Development Phase 1.3.1 Based on the approved Schematic Design Documents, model(s) and any adjustments to the Program of Requirements, BIM Execution Plan or Amount Available for the Construction Contract authorized by the Owner, the Architect/Engineer shall prepare, for approval by the Owner and review by the Construction Manager, Design Development Documents derived from the model(s) in accordance with Owner’s written requirements to further define and finalize the size and character of the Project in accordance with the BIM Execution Plan, “Facility Design Guidelines” and any additional requirements set forth in Article 15. The Architect/Engineer shall review the Design Development documents as they are being modeled at intervals appropriate to the progress of the Project with the Owner and Construction Manager at the Project site or other location specified by Owner in the State of Texas. The Architect/Engineer shall utilize the model(s) to support the review process during Design Development. The Architect/Engineer shall allow the Construction Manager to utilize the information uploaded into Owner’s PMIS to assist the Construction Manager in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Owner. 1.3.2 As a part of Design Development Phase, Architect/Engineer shall accomplish model coordination, aggregation and “clash detection” to remove conflicts in design between systems, structures and components. Architect/Engineer shall utilize Owner’s PMIS to accomplish model coordination and collaborate with Construction Manager in the resolution of critical clashes identified by the Construction Manager. Architect/Engineer shall demonstrate and provide written assurance to Owner that conflicts/collisions between models have been resolved. 1.3.3 The Architect/Engineer shall review the Estimated Construction Cost prepared by the Construction Manager, and shall provide written comments. 1.3.4 Before proceeding into the Construction Document Phase, the Architect/Engineer shall obtain Owner’s written acceptance of the Design Development documents and approval of the mutually established Amount Available for the Construction Contract and schedule. 1.3.5 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare presentation materials including an animation derived from the model(s) as defined in “Facility Design Guidelines” at completion of Design Development and if so requested shall present same to the Board of Regents at a regular meeting where scheduled within the state. 1.3.6 The Architect/Engineer shall prepare preliminary recommended furniture layouts for all spaces where it is deemed important to substantiate the fulfillment of program space requirements, or to coordinate with specific architectural, mechanical and electrical elements. 1.3.7 Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner, if requested, with seeking approval of the Project by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB). Such assistance shall include (i) the preparation of a listing of the rooms and square footages in the Project, and (ii) the preparation of project cost information, in accordance with THECB Guidelines. This information shall be provided at the completion of the Design Development Phase when requested by the Owner. The listing of rooms and square footages shall then be updated to reflect any changes occurring during construction and provided to the Owner at Substantial Completion. 1.3.8 At the completion of the Design Development Phase, or such other time as Owner may specify to Architect/Engineer, at Owner’s sole option and discretion, Owner will furnish Architect/Engineer with a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal prepared by Construction Manager based upon the Design Development documents prepared by the Architect/Engineer and approved by the Owner. The Architect/Engineer shall assist the Owner and endeavor to further and advocate the Owner’s interests in Owner’s communications with the Construction Manager in an effort to develop a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal acceptable to Owner, in Owner’s sole option and discretion. If the Owner does not accept the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal, the Architect/Engineer shall participate with the Owner and Construction Manager in constructability reviews and shall revise the documents as necessary in order to reach an agreement. If the Construction Manager’s Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal exceeds the Schematic Design Phase Estimated Construction Cost prepared by, or otherwise accepted by the Construction Manager due to an increase in the scope of the Project caused by further development of the design documents by the Architect/Engineer to the extent that such could not be reasonably inferred by the Construction Manager from the Schematic Design documents, and Owner directs Architect/Engineer to revise the documents, the Architect/Engineer shall revise the documents at its own expense so that the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal for constructing the Project shall not exceed the Owner’s Amount Available for the Construction Contract and any previously approved Estimated Construction Costs. If it is determined to be in the Owner’s best interest, instead of requiring the Architect/Engineer to revise the Drawings and Specifications, the Owner reserves the right to accept a Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that exceeds the stipulated Amount Available for the Construction Contract. The Architect/Engineer shall analyze the final Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal document, together with its supporting assumptions, clarifications, and contingencies, and shall submit a detailed written analysis of the document to the Owner. Such analysis shall include, without limitation, reference to and explanation of any inaccurate or improper assumptions and clarifications. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the Owner’s rejection of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal is not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein. 1.3.9 After the Guaranteed Maximum Price has been accepted, the Architect/Engineer shall incorporate necessary revisions into the Design Development documents. The A/E will not be required to make revisions to the documents at its own expense under the provisions of this paragraph if the revisions are required as the result of inaccurate assumptions and clarifications made in the development of the Guaranteed Maximum Price proposal that are not due to a failure of the A/E to provide the services otherwise required herein.

  • Project Scope The physical scope of the Project shall be limited to only those capital improvements as described in Appendix A of this Agreement. In the event that circumstances require a change in such physical scope, the change must be approved by the District Committee, recorded in the District Committee's official meeting minutes, and provided to the OPWC Director for the execution of an amendment to this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!