DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION AND CAREER DISCUSSION Sample Clauses

DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION AND CAREER DISCUSSION. A development discussion or other similar appraisal is held with each salaried employee once a year. The development discussion must cover at least the tasks, the performance and the development of the salaried employee, the job requirement of the task and the results of the qualification assessment and the criteria used. Every four years, a career discussion is held with each salaried employee. In the career discussion, the parties discuss changes in the content and job requirement of the salaried employee’s tasks, the development of the employee’s competence and any development needs and the changes anticipated in these in the future. At the same time, the development of the salaried employee’s salary is reviewed The shop xxxxxxx will be informed of the time and arrangements for the career discussions. If, over a period of four years, a person’s job-specific job requirement category has not changed or their personal salary component has not increased by at least 1%, their personal salary component must be increased to match the required 1% increase. However, after 30 years of employment, the salary will no longer be increased based on a career discussion.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to DEVELOPMENT DISCUSSION AND CAREER DISCUSSION

  • Mutual Discussions The Employer and the Union acknowledge the mutual benefits to be derived from dialogue between the parties and are prepared to discuss matters of common interest.

  • Discussion Staff has reviewed the proposal relative to all relevant policies and advise that it is reasonably consistent with the intent of the MPS. Attachment B provides an evaluation of the proposed development agreement in relation to the relevant MPS policies.

  • Informal Discussion If an employee has a problem relating to a work situation, the employee is encouraged to request a meeting with his or her immediate supervisor to discuss the problem in an effort to clarify the issue and to work cooperatively towards settlement.

  • Settlement Discussions This Agreement is part of a proposed settlement of matters that could otherwise be the subject of litigation among the Parties hereto. Nothing herein shall be deemed an admission of any kind. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 408 and any applicable state rules of evidence, this Agreement and all negotiations relating thereto shall not be admissible into evidence in any proceeding other than to prove the existence of this Agreement or in a proceeding to enforce the terms of this Agreement.

  • Informal Discussions The employee's concerns will be presented orally by the employee to the appropriate supervisor. Every effort shall be made by all concerned in an informal manner to develop an understanding of the facts and the issues in order to create a climate which will lead to resolution of the problem. If the employee is not satisfied with the informal discussion(s) relative to the matter in question, he/she may proceed to the formal grievance procedure.

  • Formal Discussions Section 3.1.1. Pursuant to 5 USC 7114(a)(2)(A), the Union shall be given the opportunity to be represented at any formal discussion between one or more employees it represents and one or more representatives of the Employer concerning any grievance (to include settlement discussions) or any personnel policy or practice or other general condition of employment. This right to be represented does not extend to informal discussions between an employee and a supervisor concerning a personal problem, or work methods and assignments.

  • Formal Discussion In the event that a difference of a general nature arises regarding interpretation, application, operation or alleged contravention of this Collective Agreement, the Union shall first attempt to resolve the difference through discussion with the Employer, as appropriate. If the difference is not resolved in this manner, it may become a policy grievance.

  • Preparation and Submission The Recipient will:

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.