Direct Award Ranked Solution Sample Clauses

Direct Award Ranked Solution. 3.1.3 Where the Framework Public Body’s requirements are met in full by the terms set out in the Framework Agreement, and the direct award ranked solution is deemed most suitable, the Framework Public Body will go to the 1st ranked Framework Contractor in the first instance. If, for any reason, the 1st ranked Framework Contractor cannot meet the requirements at that time, the Framework Public Body will go to the 2nd ranked Framework Contractor, and so on. The following process should be followed:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (16)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Direct Award Ranked Solution. Where the framework public body’s requirement is below £20k, is met in full by the terms set out in the framework agreement and the direct award ranked solution is deemed most suitable, the framework public body will go to the first ranked supplier (from the relevant lot) in the first instance. If, for any reason, the first ranked framework supplier cannot meet the requirements at that time, the framework public body will go to the second ranked framework supplier (from the relevant lot), and so on. Framework public bodies must not disaggregate their requirements in order to award to a particular framework supplier. Supplier rankings in each Lot are detailed (in brackets) beside their contact details contained in annex B Framework Supplier Contact Details. Awarding an order (call-off contract) A call-off contract, whether placed via mini-competition or direct award ranked solution, must be concluded by an award letter. Where a mini competition has been carried out, letters must also be issued to all unsuccessful tenderers. Please note that framework public bodies do not have to follow the standstill rules when awarding a call-off contract under a framework agreement. However, where above threshold level contract is awarded by mini competition, following the standstill rules on a voluntary basis (including summary reasons) can protect the contract from ineffectiveness, if challenged in court. Buyers are reminded of the obligations contained in the Procurement Reform (Scotland) Act 2014 in relation to the award of contracts valued equal to or greater than £50,000 including those awarded as a result of a framework call- off/mini competition. In particular, Buyers should note that in accordance with Section 23(2) the award of contracts must be publicised on the Public Contracts Scotland website and in accordance with Section 35 contracts must be registered in the contracting authority’s “contracts register”. Your attention is also drawn to the requirement to provide feedback in accordance with Section 32 and Section 33
Sample 1
Direct Award Ranked Solution. Where the framework public body’s requirement is below £7k, is met in full by the terms set out in the framework agreement and the direct award ranked solution is deemed most suitable, the framework public body will go to the first ranked supplier (from the relevant lot) in the first instance. If, for any reason, the first ranked framework supplier cannot meet the requirements at that time, the framework public body will go to the second ranked framework supplier (from the relevant lot), and so on. Framework public bodies must not disaggregate their requirements in order to award to a particular framework supplier. Supplier rankings in each Lot are detailed (in brackets) beside their contact details contained in annex B.
Sample 1

Related to Direct Award Ranked Solution

  • Direct Award 11.1. The framework public body should issue their complete brief in accordance with schedule 5 (Standard Terms of Supply) ensuring that the contractor is made aware that the requirement is a call-off under the framework and forward to the first ranked contractor for consideration. The contractor should review the brief and submit a short proposal along with pricing to the framework public body. The ranking positions are detailed in the table below.

  • Selection Criteria for Awarding Task Order The Government will award to the offeror whose proposal is deemed most advantageous to the Government based upon an integrated assessment using the evaluation criteria. The Government will evaluate proposals against established selection criteria specified in the task order RFP. Generally, the Government's award decision will be based on selection criteria which addresses past performance, technical acceptability, proposal risk and cost. Among other sources, evaluation of past performance may be based on past performance assessments provided by TO Program Managers on individual task orders performed throughout the life of the contract. The order of importance for the factors will be identified in the RFP for the specified task order.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) XXX.gov)

  • Contract Award Award shall be made on a lump sum basis to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder. The lowest bid will be the bid whose price, after incorporating all accepted alternates, is the lowest responsive bid that was received from a responsible bidder. No bid may be withdrawn for a period of thirty-five days after time has been called on the date of opening except in accordance with the provisions of law.

  • Performance Frameworks ‌ The School's academic, organizational, and financial performance under this Charter Contract shall be evaluated using the Academic, Organizational, and Financial Performance Frameworks, respectively, attached as Exhibit B to this Charter Contract. The specific terms, forms, and requirements of the Performance Frameworks, including any required indicators, measures, metrics, and targets, are maintained and disseminated by the Commission and shall be binding on the School. Material changes to the Performance Frameworks shall require approval by the Commission.

  • Performance Measurement Satisfactory performance of this Contract will be measured by:

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6.

  • Award Criteria 40.1 The Procuring Entity shall award the Contract to the successful tenderer whose tender has been determined to be the Lowest Evaluated Tender in accordance with procedures in Section 3: Evaluation and Qualification Criteria.

  • System for Award Management (XXX) Requirement Alongside a signed copy of this Agreement, Grantee will provide Florida Housing with a XXX.xxx proof of registration and Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) number. Grantee will continue to maintain an active XXX registration with current information at all times during which it has an active award under this Agreement.

  • Acceptance/Performance Test 4.7.1 Prior to synchronization of the Power Project, the SPD shall be required to get the Project certified for the requisite acceptance/performance test as may be laid down by Central Electricity Authority or an agency identified by the central government to carry out testing and certification for the solar power projects.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.