EMA REVIEW SCORING Sample Clauses

EMA REVIEW SCORING. 5.1 The Authority shall provide to the Franchisee, no later than ten (10) Weekdays following the EMA Review Meeting, a duly completed EMA Review Scorecard setting out the Franchisee's performance in each of the EMA Criteria for the EMA Performance Period. 5.2 The Franchisee shall be scored 3, 2 or 1 in relation to each EMA Criterion. 5.3 The EMA Review shall be complete once the Authority has sent a duly completed EMA Review Scorecard to the Franchisee in accordance with paragraph 5.1 above. 5.4 Scores in the EMA Review Scorecard shall be awarded by the Authority having regard to the EMA Scoring Standards. One single, integer, overall score shall be awarded in relation to each EMA Criterion based on the Authority’s assessment of the Franchisee’s performance in respect of that EMA Criterion against the EMA Scoring Standards and taking into account: (a) the EMA Review Report provided to the Authority by the Franchisee in accordance with paragraphs 3.3 and 3.4 above; (b) any commentary provided to the Franchisee by the Authority in accordance with paragraph 3.5 above; and (c) any discussions between the Franchisee and the Authority at the EMA Review Meeting. 5.5 The Franchisee shall receive a Performance Payment, in accordance with Schedule 8.A (Franchise Payments), if the Franchisee scores 2 or above with respect to one or more of the EMA Criteria. 5.6 The Franchisee shall not receive a Performance Payment if the Franchisee scores 1 in relation to all three of the EMA Criteria. 5.7 If the Franchisee: (a) is operating at a level that would, or would likely, be scored "1"; or (b) has received a score of "1", in relation to any of the EMA Criteria during an EMA Performance Period, then the Authority may require a Remedial Plan and the provisions of Schedule 10.1 of the Franchis e Agreement shall apply.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to EMA REVIEW SCORING

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances 1. If FEMA determines that the entire scope of an Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances in Appendix B of this Agreement, with determinations for Tier II Allowances being made by SOI-qualified staff, FEMA shall complete the Section 106 review process by documenting this determination in the project file, without SHPO review or notification. 2. If the Undertaking involves a National Historic Landmark (NHL), FEMA shall notify the SHPO, participating Tribe(s), and the NPS NHL Program Manager of the NPS Midwest Regional Office that the Undertaking conforms to one or more allowances. FEMA shall provide information about the proposed scope of work for the Undertaking and the allowance(s) enabling FEMA’s determination. 3. If FEMA determines any portion of an Undertaking’s scope of work does not conform to one or more allowances listed in Appendix B, FEMA shall conduct expedited or standard Section 106 review, as appropriate, for the entire Undertaking in accordance with Stipulation II.B, Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings, or Stipulation II.C, Standard Project Review. 4. Allowances may be revised and new allowances may be added to this Agreement in accordance with Stipulation IV.A.3, Amendments. B. Expedited Review for Emergency Undertakings

  • Design Review ‌ (a) Where so specified in Schedule A (Scope of Goods and Services) or as otherwise instructed by the City, the Supplier shall submit design-related Documentation for review by the City, and shall not proceed with work on the basis of such design Documentation until the City’s approval of such Documentation has been received in writing. (b) None of: (i) the submission of Documentation to the City by the Supplier; (ii) its examination by or on behalf of the City; or (iii) the making of any comment thereon (including any approval thereof) shall in any way relieve the Supplier of any of its obligations under this Agreement or of its duty to take reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and correctness of such Documentation, and its suitability to the matter to which it relates.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Claims Review Population A description of the Population subject to the Claims Review.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!