Assessment of the Sample Clauses

Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan 1. Each KPA should be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance indicators have been met and with due regard to ad hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPA. 2. An indicative rating on the five-point scale should be provided for each KPA. 3. The applicable assessment-rating calculator must then be used to add the scores and calculate a final KPA score.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Assessment of the achieved results by the KNOW-HOW BENEFICIARIES (i.
Assessment of the merits of the proposed agreement
Assessment of the. Efficiency of the Administrative Mechanism: The Council is responsible for evaluating how quickly and efficiently the Recipient contracts with service providers who are selected by the Recipient to deliver services for PWH pursuant to the Xxxx Xxxxx Part A grant (“Subrecipients”) and how long the Recipient takes to pay the funded subrecipients. The Council also determines whether the Recipient used service funds as specified in the Council’s priorities and allocations. The Executive Committee of the Council carries out an assessment of the efficiency of the administrative mechanism each fiscal year and provides a report on findings and recommendations to the full Council for review and approval. a. The Recipient provides information needed for the assessment on a mutually agreed upon timeframe and facilitates any needed collection of information from funded service providers, so that the Council can implement an independent assessment. b. The Recipient will provide information for the assessment of the administrative mechanism to inform the Council’s assessment of timeliness of contract executions and payments. c. The Council provides the report to the Recipient by July 31st of each year for use in the Part A application. d. The Council may conduct a survey of subrecipients triennially. The Recipient will share an updated list of subrecipients for survey distribution.
Assessment of the similar experience of Key Experts64 The maximum score for this assessment factor is 50 percentage points. The experience assessment algorithm for the Key Experts is described at Table 15. For the presentation of the similar experience of Key Experts, cf. Section 15 Table 15: Assessment of the experience of Key Experts TYPE, POSITION AND POWER OF SIGNATURE OF THE KEY EXPERT 1. Key Expert 1: Project manager65 — 0 documentations or documents 1-4 documentations or documents 5-10 documentations or documents Steering the preparation or updating of documentations in the following three categories of urban planning documentations received by the Beneficiary: General Urban Plans of cities and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations; General Urban Plans of towns and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations; Zonal Urban Plans of cities or towns and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations. Steering the preparation or updating of strategic planning documents in the following categories, which have been received by the Beneficiary: Local Development Strategy; Integrated Urban Development Strategy; Sustainable Urban Mobility Plan; Other strategies or sectoral plans for cities or towns. 0.0 max. 2.0 max. 5.0 2. Key Expert 2: Head of Complex Project66 D or equivalent67 0 documentations 1-4 documentations 5-10 documentations Coordinating the preparation or updating of documentations in the following three categories of urban planning documentations received by the Beneficiary: General Urban Plans of cities and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations; General Urban Plans of towns and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations; Zonal Urban Plans of cities or towns and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations. 0.0 max. 2.0 max. 5.0 3. Key Expert 3: Urban equipment68 G1 or equivalent 0 documentations 1-4 documentations 5-10 documentations Taking part in the preparation or updating of urban planning documents in the following categories, which have been received by the Beneficiary: General Urban Plans of cities and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations; General Urban Plans of towns and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations; Zonal Urban Plans of cities or towns and their related Local Urban Planning Regulations. 0.0 max. 2.0 max. 5.0
Assessment of the national restoration plans 1. The Commission shall assess the draft national restoration plans within six months of the date of receipt. When carrying out that assessment, the Commission shall act in close cooperation with the Member State concerned. 2. When assessing the draft national restoration plan, the Commission shall evaluate: (a) its compliance with Article 12; (b) its adequacy for meeting the targets and obligations set out in Articles 4 to 10a; (c) its contribution to the Union’s overarching objectives referred to in Article 1, the specific objectives referred to in Article 7(1) to restore at least 25 000 km of rivers into free-flowing rivers in the Union by 2030 and the commitment referred to in Article 10a of planting at least three billion additional trees in the Union by 2030. 3. For the purpose of the assessment of the draft national restoration plans, the Commission shall be assisted by experts or the EEA. 4. The Commission may address observations to Member States within six months of the date of receipt of the draft national restoration plan. 5. Member States shall take ▌ account of any observations from the Commission in its final national restoration plan. 6. Member States shall finalise, publish and submit to the Commission the national restoration plan within six months from the date of receipt of observations from the Commission.

Related to Assessment of the

  • Assessment The Secretary of State will notify the appropriate body for assessment purposes about the Academy.

  • Environmental Assessments Foreclose on or take a deed or title to any commercial real estate without first conducting a Phase I environmental assessment of the property or foreclose on any commercial real estate if such environmental assessment indicates the presence of a Hazardous Substance in amounts which, if such foreclosure were to occur, would be material.

  • Environmental Assessment Buyer shall have the right for a period commencing upon execution of this Agreement by both parties and ending on November 28, 2012, to conduct an environmental assessment of the Assets, at Buyer’s sole risk, liability and expense. Seller shall make available to Buyer, during the environmental assessment period described above, Seller’s historical files regarding prior operations on the Assets, and provide Buyer and its representatives with reasonable access to the Assets to conduct the environmental assessment. Buyer shall provide Seller three (3) days prior written notice of a desired date(s) for such assessment and Seller shall have the right to be present during any assessment and, if any testing is conducted pursuant to Seller’s express prior written consent, Seller may require splitting of all samples. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Buyer shall not have the right to drill any test, monitor or other xxxxx or to extract samples of any air, soil, water or other substance from the Assets without Seller’s express prior written consent. If Buyer proposes a reasonable request to drill a test well or extract a sample pursuant to a systematic and customary procedure for the assessment of the environmental condition of the Assets and Seller refuses to grant its consent to such a well or sampling, then Buyer shall have the right, for a period of seventy-two (72) hours following notification of Seller’s refusal to consent, to deliver written notice to Seller of Buyer’s election to exclude from this transaction the portion of the Assets affected by such proposed test well or sample, and the Purchase Price shall be adjusted accordingly by the Allocated Value of such portion of the Assets so excluded. Under no circumstances whatsoever shall Seller ever be obligated to grant its consent to any such test xxxxx or sampling proposed by Buyer, and Buyer’s sole and exclusive remedy for any refusal by Seller to grant its consent shall be the limited right contained in the preceding sentence to exclude the affected Assets from the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. If Buyer fails to exercise the right to exclude such Assets by written notice to Seller delivered prior to the expiration of the seventy-two hour period described above, then Buyer shall be conclusively deemed to have waived such right and shall be obligated to purchase the affected Assets without conducting such testing or sampling or any adjustment of the Purchase Price unless otherwise provided in this Agreement.

  • Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - DST shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats Schedule 10.2 p.2 occurring and the impact of those threats upon DST organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”). b. Risk Mitigation - DST shall use commercially reasonable efforts to manage, control and remediate threats identified in the Risk Assessments that it believes are likely to result in material unauthorized access, copying, use, processing, disclosure, alteration, transfer, loss or destruction of Fund Data, consistent with the Objective, and commensurate with the sensitivity of the Fund Data and the complexity and scope of the activities of DST pursuant to the Agreement. c. Security Controls Testing - DST shall, on approximately an annual basis, engage an independent external party to conduct a review (including information security) of DST’s systems that are related to the provision of services. DST shall have a process to review and evaluate high risk findings resulting from this testing.

  • Phase II A small portion of the work for the Phase II modifications to the Plattsburgh Substation will be performed by Transmission Owner, and the remainder will be performed by Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx. A detailed definition of the specific scope for Transmission Owner and Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx including interface points shall be defined during the design phase and, as such documents become available, copies will be delivered to the NYISO, Transmission Owner, Noble Altona Windpark, LLC and Marble River, LLC. The full scope includes the installation of wave traps, CCVT’s and modifications and/or additions to relaying on the MWP-1 and MWP- 2 lines. These lines will be reconfigured at the completion of Phase II to connect to Xxxxx and Xxxxxxx Substations on MWP-1 and the Xxxx Substation on MWP-2. Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx will design the upgrades and purchase the materials based on the outline specification that was prepared and issued by Transmission Owner. The work to be performed by Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx will include both the materials for the exterior and interior installations and items for Transmission Owner installation inside the control building in existing relay panels and communication racks. In addition, Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx will be responsible for the exterior and interior construction work and will provide construction management services in coordination with Transmission Owner. The civil design for the foundations and the electrical design for the cable runs to the control room will be designed by, as approved by Transmission Owner, and installed under the supervision and control of Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx. The equipment will be selected and procured in accordance with the specifications developed during the detailed engineering phase, copies of which shall be furnished to the NYISO, Transmission Owner, Noble Altona Windpark, LLC and Marble River, LLC. The construction of the foundations, structures, wave traps, CCTV and cable runs into the control building to the termination cabinets will be completed by Clinton and Xxxxxxxxx. The work at the Plattsburgh Substation will be installed under Transmission Owner’s CPP-1. Transmission Owner will provide Protection and Controls Engineering, install and terminate wiring from the termination cabinets to the control panels and relays, install relays and equipment in the existing panels, and will commission such work inside the 230kV control building. Transmission Owner will develop the communications protocols and data flow over the circuits.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 During the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will also be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.13 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met (qualitative and quantitative) and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI; 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale described in 6.9 below shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Assessments To Borrower’s knowledge, there are no pending or proposed special or other assessments for public improvements or otherwise affecting the Property, nor are there any contemplated improvements to the Property that may result in such special or other assessments.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!