ETC’s Process and Procedure Checklist for Solicitation Reviews and Submission of Proposals Sample Clauses

ETC’s Process and Procedure Checklist for Solicitation Reviews and Submission of Proposals. The CA’s function within the Company’s overall proposal effort is an essential one that cannot be overemphasized. It is at once educational, advisory and preventive in nature; that is, to identify and resolve problems and questions early in the proposal stage, and avoid having to backtrack after the contract is received and attempting to get it resolved. The CA should assume that most personnel are not always keen to the finer (or, even some of the more obvious) points of Government contract laws and regulations, and it is his/her task to instruct and advise them in such matters. This is initially achieved by (a) performing a detailed review of the RFP package, and (b) recording comments in the bid review/summary document that is distributed to all proposal team members. Below is a basic checklist to follow. • Ensure that the entire bid package is on hand, including referenced attachments and amendments. Immediately obtain any missing documents from the CO. • Resolve any unclear, ambiguous or patently obvious solicitation errors immediately, in writing to the CO. • Ensure that all referenced government specifications and/or standards are available. If not, obtain them immediately. • Read every bid provision carefully, noting any portions that will need specific comment or instruction. • Type all review comments on the ETC RFQ/RFP Summary/Comment form. • Circulate bid package, etc. to proposal team for collective evaluation. • Delivery requirementsShipping terms • Is there a liquidated damages provision? • Is there a Warranty period and does it exceed ETC’s standard warranty? • Is a bid guarantee required? (if so, refer to the CFO for premium cost and availability). • Is a Performance guarantee required? (if so, refer to the CFO for premium cost and availability). • Special QC/Inspection/Acceptance requirements (i.e., industrial or military standards or specs). • Shipping terms (Risk: FOB/CIF/C&F, etc.), and who pays transportation cost. • Payment terms: (i.e., net 30 days, progress payments, milestone payments, etc.) • Export licensing requirements, if any. This may apply to Foreign Military Sales (FMS) contracts. The Export Administrator should be queried on this. • Intellectual Property relative to proprietary data and software/source code. Review the RFP Data Rights provisions. • Is a pre-proposal conference and/or site visit required? If so, make special note in comments. Failure to attend waives any protection against later contractual problems rel...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to ETC’s Process and Procedure Checklist for Solicitation Reviews and Submission of Proposals

  • Submission of Grievance Information a. Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the appealing party shall, within five (5) days after notice of appointment, forward to the arbitrator, with a copy to the School Board, the submission of the grievance which shall include the following: 1. The issues involved. 2. Statement of the facts. 3. Position of the grievant. 4. The written documents relating to Section 5 of the grievance procedure.

  • Evaluation of Proposals All proposals received shall be reviewed to determine whether they meet the format requirements and the standards specified in the request for sealed proposals. The district shall evaluate the qualifications of the proposers based solely upon the criteria and evaluation methodology set forth in the request for sealed proposals, and shall assign a best value score to each proposal. Once the evaluation is complete, all responsive proposals shall be ranked from the highest best value to the lowest best value to the district.

  • SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS Proposals will be submitted to the attention of Xx. Xxxxxxx Xxxx at XXX.Xxxxxxxxxxx@XxxxxxxXXX.xxx no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Thursday, April 7, 2022.

  • NOTIFICATIONS AND SUBMISSION OF REPORTS Unless otherwise stated in writing after the Effective Date, all notifications and reports required under this IA shall be submitted to the following entities: Administrative and Civil Remedies Branch Office of Counsel to the Inspector General Office of Inspector General U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Xxxxx Building, Room 5527 000 Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, XX Xxxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Facsimile: (000) 000-0000 LFAC: Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx, DPM 0000 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xx. X-000 Xxxxxxxxx, XX 00000 Telephone: (000) 000-0000 Email: xx.xxxxx@xxxxx.xxx Unless otherwise specified, all notifications and reports required by this IA may be made by electronic mail, overnight mail, hand delivery, or other means, provided that there is proof that such notification was received. Upon request by OIG, LFAC may be required to provide OIG with an additional copy of each notification or report required by this IA in OIG’s requested format (electronic or paper).

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

  • SUBMISSION OF BID Bids may be submitted via the electronic submission portal at: xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx/buyer/691, or in the Procurement Division; Internal Operations Centre II, 000 X. Xxxxx Xxxxxx; 0xx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx, XX 00000, prior to the submission deadline. Bids will be opened per the public meeting notice. If bid will be mailed or hand delivered, ensure it is secured in a sealed envelope, addressed as follows: A. Invitation for Bids Number B. Due Date of Bid Submittal C. Name of Bidder

  • Submission of Grievances A. Any employee or group of employees shall have the right to present a grievance. No employee or group of employees shall be hindered from or disciplined for exercising this right. B. If any two (2) or more employees have essentially the same grievance they may, and if requested by the County must, collectively present and pursue their grievance if they report to the same immediate supervisor. C. If the grievant is a group of more than three (3) employees, the group shall, at the request of the County, appoint one (1) or two (2) employees to speak for the collective group. To be considered a grievant in a group grievance, each employee must be individually identified as a grievant when the grievance is submitted at Step 2.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Auction Schedule; Method of Submission of Orders (a) The Funds and the Auction Agent shall conduct Auctions for each series of Preferred Shares in accordance with the schedule set forth below. Such schedule may be changed at any time by the Auction Agent with the consent of the Fund, which consent shall not be withheld unreasonably. The Auction Agent shall give notice of any such change to BD. Such notice shall be received prior to the first Auction Date on which any such change shall be effective. Time Event ---- ----- By 9:30 A.M. Auction Agent advises the Funds and the Broker-Dealers of the Maximum Rate as set forth in Section 3.2(a) hereof.

  • Agent’s Review of Proposed Amendments and Supplements Prior to amending or supplementing the Registration Statement (including any registration statement filed under Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act) or the Prospectus (excluding any amendment or supplement through incorporation of any report filed under the Exchange Act), the Company shall furnish to the Agent for review, a reasonable amount of time prior to the proposed time of filing or use thereof, a copy of each such proposed amendment or supplement, and the Company shall not file or use any such proposed amendment or supplement without the Agent’s prior consent, and to file with the Commission within the applicable period specified in Rule 424(b) under the Securities Act any prospectus required to be filed pursuant to such Rule.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!