Evaluation and Review of Performance Results Sample Clauses

Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of Health Service Provider performance • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required • determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the SMHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the SMHS performance are listed in the PMP. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO, and may be increased if performance issues occur.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance; • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern; • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe; • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated; and • regular performance review meetings held between the Department CEO and XXXXX, or representatives of either Party. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur. Performance reporting arrangements that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate XXXXX’x performance are specified in the PMP.
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of Health Service Provider performance • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required • determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the EMHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the EMHS performance are listed in the PMP. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO, and may be increased if performance issues occur.
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of Health Service Provider performance • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required • determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the NMHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the NMHS performance are listed in the PMP. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO, and may be increased if performance issues occur.
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise:  on-going review of Health Service Provider performance  identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern  deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required  determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the CAHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the CAHS’s performance are listed in the PMP. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is based on the CAHS’s performance and is determined by the Department CEO.
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of HSP performance, • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern, • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the relevant timeframe, and • determining levels of intervention and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the QC, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the QC’s performance are listed in the PMP. These performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO and may be increased if performance issues occur.
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of Health Service Provider performance • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required • determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the HSS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the HSS’s performance are listed in the PMP. Issues advised to the Department CEO by other Health Service Providers utilising the services provided by the HSS will be raised within the performance review meetings for response by the HSS. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is based on the HSS’s performance and is determined by the Department CEO.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise: • on-going review of Health Service Provider performance • identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern • deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required • determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the Quadriplegic Centre, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the Quadriplegic Centre performance are listed in the PMP. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is determined by the Department CEO, and may be increased if performance issues occur.
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise:  on-going review of Health Service Provider performance  identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern  deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required  determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the SMHS, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the SMHS’s performance are listed in the PMP. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is based on the SMHS’s performance and is determined by the Department CEO.
Evaluation and Review of Performance Results. The PMP is based on a responsive regulation intervention model. The model is a collaborative approach that enables accountability through agreed mechanisms that are responsive when performance issues have been identified. The performance management components of the PMP comprise:  on-going review of Health Service Provider performance  identifying a performance concern and determining the appropriate response and agreed timeframe to address the concern  deciding when a performance recovery plan is required and the timeframe it is required  determining the level of intervention when required and when the performance intervention needs to be escalated or de-escalated. Regular performance review meetings will be held between the Department CEO and the Centre, or representatives of either Party. The performance reports that enable the Department CEO to monitor and evaluate the Centre’s performance are listed in the PMP. The performance reports are an important part of the performance review meetings. The frequency of the meetings is based on the Centre’s performance and is determined by the Department CEO.
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.