Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. Based on information provided by SFPUC and BAWSCA, the EKI Team will evaluate supply reliability and/or constraints of EMID’s existing SFPUC allocation (e.g., related to the impacts of the SWRCB’s Bay Delta Plan and pending Settlement Agreements). The EKI Team will compare EMID’s total projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal, dry, and a period of five dry years, as now required under CWC §10635(b). The EKI Team proposes to conduct Tasks 3 and 4 concurrently, and to present the results of this work at Workshop #2 (identified under Subtask 4.4, below). Task 3 Deliverables: • Draft supply projections, including descriptions of water availability and supply reliability • Draft description of recycled water • Draft supply evaluation of water quality • Draft supply versus demand projection comparisons
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. Based on information provided by SFPUC and BAWSCA, EKI will evaluate supply reliability and/or constraints of the City’s existing SFPUC allocation (e.g. related to the impacts of the SWRCB’s Bay Delta Plan and pending Settlement Agreements). With this information and the information compiled under Task 3 for other supply sources, EKI will compare the City’s total projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal, dry, and multiple dry years. To the extent that there are significant shortfalls or uncertainties identified, EKI will bring these issues to the City’s attention so that they can be addressed prior to drafting the Administrative Draft UWMP.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. EKI will compare the City’s projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal years and for an extended five-year drought period. To the extent that there are significant shortfalls or uncertainties identified, EKI will bring these issues to the City’s attention so that they can be addressed prior to drafting the Administrative Draft UWMP.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. Based on information provided by SFPUC and BAWSCA, the EKI Team will evaluate supply reliability and/or constraints of EMID’s existing SFPUC allocation (e.g., related to the impacts of the SWRCB’s Bay Delta Plan and pending Settlement Agreements). The EKI Team will compare EMID’s total projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal, dry, and a period of five dry years, as now required under CWC §10635(b). The EKI Team proposes to conduct Tasks 3 and 4 concurrently, and to present the results of this work at Workshop #2 (identified under Subtask 4.4, below). Task 3 Deliverables:  Draft supply projections, including descriptions of water availability and supply reliability  Draft description of recycled water  Draft supply evaluation of water quality  Draft supply versus demand projection comparisons TASK 4 – PREPARE DATA AND INFORMATION REGARDING WATER CONSERVATION AND WATER SHORTAGE CONTINGENCY PLANNING Task 4 includes preparing documentation and water conservation implementation information and an update to EMID’s existing WSCP. This task also includes analysis to confirm EMID compliance with Senate Xxxx X7-7 per capita water usage target for 2020.
Sample 1
Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. XXX will compare the City’s projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal years and for an extended five-year drought period. To the extent that there are significant shortfalls or uncertainties identified, XXX will bring these issues to the City’s attention so that they can be addressed prior to drafting the Administrative Draft UWMP.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand

  • TRANSITION OF SUPPLY In connection with the expiration, cancellation or termination of the Purchase Order by either Buyer or Seller, in whole or in part, for any or no cause (including, without limitation, Buyer’s decision to change to an alternate source for manufacture of the goods in question, including but not limited to a Buyer- owned or -operated facility), Seller will cooperate in the transition of supply. Seller will continue production and delivery of all goods and services as ordered by Buyer, at the prices and in compliance with the terms of the Purchase Order, without premium or other condition, during the entire period reasonably needed by Buyer to complete the transition to the alternate supplier(s). Subject to Seller’s reasonable capacity constraints, Seller will provide special overtime production, storage and/or management of extra inventory of the goods or services, extraordinary packaging and transportation and other special services (collectively, “Transition Support”) as expressly requested by Buyer in writing. If resource of the goods or services occurs for reasons other than Seller’s termination or breach, Buyer will, at the end of the transition period, pay the reasonable, actual cost of Transition Support as requested and incurred, provided that, upon request, Seller has advised Buyer prior to incurring such amounts of its estimate of such costs. If the parties disagree on the cost of Transition Support, Xxxxx will pay the agreed portion to Seller and pay the disputed portion into third-party escrow for disbursement after the dispute has been resolved.

  • Completion of Evaluation Cycle 1. The summative evaluation rating shall be based upon a preponderance of the evidence, assessed in a holistic manner, that is aligned to the Ohio Educator Standards. Only evidence gathered during the walkthroughs and formal observations that are conducted for the current school year may be used.

  • Finalization of Evaluation A Written Report 1 Before the evaluation cycle is final, and not later than May 10, a copy of the formal written evaluation report shall be given to the teacher and a conference shall be held between the teacher and the evaluator.

  • SUSPENSION OF SUPPLIER'S APPOINTMENT 27.1 Without prejudice to the Authority's rights to terminate this Framework Agreement as set out in Clause 26 (Termination), or if the Authority reasonably believes that a Consistent Failure has occurred, the Authority may suspend the Supplier's appointment to provide Services to Contracting Bodies under this Framework Agreement by giving notice in writing to the Supplier which notice shall take immediate effect from the date specified in such notice and the Supplier agrees that it shall not be entitled to enter into any new Order during such suspension period.

  • DISCONNECTION OF SUPPLY 14.1 When can we arrange for disconnection? Subject to us satisfying the requirements in the Rules, we may arrange for the disconnection of your premises if:

  • Billing and Payment Procedure for Forest Products Delivered The State will compute and forward to Purchaser a billing statement of charges for forest products delivered during the billing period at the delivered rate shown in P- 028.2 clause. After receipt of the billing statement, Purchaser’s payment must be received by the Department of Natural Resources on or before the due date shown on the billing statement. Purchaser agrees to make payment, payable to the Department of Natural Resources. Failure to pay on time for forest products delivered is considered a breach of contract. Included with the billing statement will be a summary report for the billing period compiled by the State or their log and load reporting service. The State will adjust final xxxxxxxx to account for any State approved payment reductions. P-080 Payment Account Refund Advance payments made under P-045 or P-045.2 remaining on account above the value for the charges shall be returned to Purchaser within 30 days following the final report of charges. Refunds not made within the 30 day period will accrue interest at the interest rate, as established by WAC 000-000-000, computed on a daily basis until paid.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Escrow Agent Not Responsible for Furnished Information The Escrow Agent will have no responsibility for seeking, obtaining, compiling, preparing or determining the accuracy of any information or document, including the representative capacity in which a party purports to act, that the Escrow Agent receives as a condition to a release from escrow or a transfer of escrow securities within escrow under this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.