Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand Sample Clauses

Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. Based on information provided by SFPUC and BAWSCA, EKI will evaluate supply reliability and/or constraints of the City’s existing SFPUC allocation (e.g. related to the impacts of the SWRCB’s Bay Delta Plan and pending Settlement Agreements). With this information and the information compiled under Task 3 for other supply sources, EKI will compare the City’s total projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal, dry, and multiple dry years. To the extent that there are significant shortfalls or uncertainties identified, EKI will bring these issues to the City’s attention so that they can be addressed prior to drafting the Administrative Draft UWMP.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. XXX will compare the City’s projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal years and for an extended five-year drought period. To the extent that there are significant shortfalls or uncertainties identified, XXX will bring these issues to the City’s attention so that they can be addressed prior to drafting the Administrative Draft UWMP.
Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand. Based on information provided by SFPUC and BAWSCA, the EKI Team will evaluate supply reliability and/or constraints of EMID’s existing SFPUC allocation (e.g., related to the impacts of the SWRCB’s Bay Delta Plan and pending Settlement Agreements). The EKI Team will compare EMID’s total projected water supply to projected water demand in five-year increments for the next 25 years, for normal, dry, and a period of five dry years, as now required under CWC §10635(b). The EKI Team proposes to conduct Tasks 3 and 4 concurrently, and to present the results of this work at Workshop #2 (identified under Subtask 4.4, below).  Draft supply projections, including descriptions of water availability and supply reliability  Draft description of recycled water  Draft supply evaluation of water quality  Draft supply versus demand projection comparisons Task 4 includes preparing documentation and water conservation implementation information and an update to EMID’s existing WSCP. This task also includes analysis to confirm EMID compliance with Senate Xxxx X7-7 per capita water usage target for 2020. Subtask 4.1 Evaluation of Historic, Current and Projected Future Water Conservation and Demand Management Measures (DMMs)

Related to Evaluation of Supply Versus Demand

  • SUSPENSION OF SUPPLIER'S APPOINTMENT 31.1 If the Authority is entitled to terminate this Framework Agreement pursuant to Clause 30 (Authority Termination Rights), the Authority may instead elect in its sole discretion to suspend the Supplier's ability to accept Orders under this Framework Agreement by giving notice in writing to the Supplier, and the Supplier agrees that it shall not be entitled to enter into any new Call Off Agreement during the period specified in the Authority’s notice. 31.2 Any suspension under Clause 31.1 shall be without prejudice to any right of termination which has already accrued, or subsequently accrues, to the Authority. 31.3 The Parties acknowledge that suspension shall not affect the Supplier's obligation to perform any existing Call Off Agreements concluded prior to the suspension notice. 31.4 If the Authority provides notice to the Supplier in accordance with this Clause 31.1, the Supplier's appointment under this Framework Agreement shall be suspended for the period set out in the notice or such other period notified to the Supplier by the Authority in writing from time to time. 31.5 For the avoidance of doubt, no period of suspension under this Clause 31 shall result in an extension of the Framework Period.

  • DISCONNECTION OF SUPPLY 14.1 When can we arrange for disconnection? (a) you do not pay your bill by the pay-by date and, if you are a residential customer, you: (i) fail to comply with the terms of an agreed payment plan; or (ii) do not agree to an offer to pay the bill by instalments, or having agreed, you fail to comply with the instalment arrangement; (b) you do not provide a security deposit we are entitled to require from you; or (c) you do not give access to your premises to read a meter (where relevant) for 3 consecutive meter reads; or (d) you fail to give us safe and unhindered access to the premises as required by clause 11 or any requirements under the energy laws; or (e) there has been illegal or fraudulent use of energy at your premises in breach of clause 16 of this contract; or (f) we are otherwise entitled or required to do so under the Rules or by law.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Program Monitoring and Evaluation The Recipient shall prepare, or cause to be prepared, and furnish to the Association not later than six months after the Closing Date, a report of such scope and in such detail as the Association shall reasonably request, on the execution of the Program, the performance by the Recipient and the Association of their respective obligations under the Legal Agreements and the accomplishment of the purposes of the Financing.”

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract. a. The contractor shall notify all potential subcontractors and suppliers and lessors of their EEO obligations under this contract. b. The contractor will use good faith efforts to ensure subcontractor compliance with their EEO obligations.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!