Evaluation of the Proposal Sample Clauses

Evaluation of the Proposal. 4.4.1. The technical proposal shall be open for all the applicants submitted their proposal onlineand key documents within due date. 4.4.2. Then each individual proposal shall be assessed against the eligibility criteria given in Para 3.0 to shortlist the eligible applicants after evaluation of the samples submitted by the bidders. It is mandatory to quote for all items under as given in this RFP otherwise bidder may liable to be rejected. 4.4.3. Financial proposal shall be evaluated /compared based on the total price of the particular group i.e. uniform group. L1 will be derived for uniform group. Hence bidder should quote all the items as per RFP. 4.4.4. Then the technical proposals of only eligible applicants shall be further evaluated to award score as per their credentials based on the documents furnished and information provided in the technical proposal. 4.4.5. The technical proposal of eligible applicants shall be evaluated, and samples may be called for each item quoted to check the quality and colour specifications as per below standards. 1.00 DOCTOR's APRON - - - - - 1.01 Doctor Coat White With Mob. Pocket with ACCF Logo (Sizes-Small, Medium, Large, X large) labour charges etc complete Nos POLY 67%, VISCOSE 33% 140 215 Gab Finish 2.00 TECHNICIAN APRON - - - - - 2.01 TECHNICAN COAT WHITE HALF SLEEVE with ACCF Logo (Sizes-Small, Medium, Large, X large) Nos POLY 80% Viscose 20% 140 215 Gab Finish 3.00 NURSES UNIFORM 3.01 NURSING TOP BEIGE WITH RED PIPIN with ACCF Logo (Sizes-Small, Medium, Large, X large) (front close) Set POLY 67%, VISCOSE 33% 2/30S 198 TROVINE 3.02 NURSING TROUSER BEIGE WITH ELASTIC with ACCF Logo (Sizes-Small, Medium, Large, X large) POLY 67%, VISCOSE 33% 2/30S 198 TROVINE
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation of the Proposal. The evaluation of the Proposal will consist of four (4) phases as described below.
Evaluation of the Proposal. The Commission, based on the evaluation criteria and method given in Attachment 2, will determine the Proposal that ‘most effectively satisfies the technical and operational requirements set out in the solicitation documents’. The Commission reserves the right, as it deems appropriate, to award to a single bidder, to award to multiple bidders in any combination or not to award to any of the bidders as a result of this RFP.

Related to Evaluation of the Proposal

  • Evaluation of Tenders 33.1 The Procuring Entity shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITT and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification criteria. No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. By applying the criteria and methodologies, the Procuring Entity shall determine the Lowest Evaluated Tender. This is the Tender of the Tenderer that meets the qualification criteria and whose Tender has been determined to be: a) substantially responsive to the tender documents; and b) the lowest evaluated price. 33.2 Price evaluation will be done for Items or Lots (contracts), as specified in the TDS; and the Tender Price as quoted in accordance with ITT 14. To evaluate a Tender, the Procuring Entity shall consider the following: a) price adjustment due to unconditional discounts offered in accordance with ITT 13.4; b) converting the amount resulting from applying (a) and (b) above, if relevant, to a single currency in accordance with ITT 31; c) price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial non-conformities in accordance with ITT 29.3; and d) any additional evaluation factors specified in the TDS and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. 33.3 The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Conditions of Contract, applied over the period of execution of the Contract, shall not be considered in Tender evaluation. 33.4 Where the tender involves multiple lots or contracts, the tenderer will be allowed to tender for one or more lots (contracts). Each lot or contract will be evaluated in accordance with ITT 33.

  • Technical Proposal The technical proposal may be presented in free format. It shall not exceed ten pages, not counting the CVs. It shall respect the following page limit and structure: • Technical methodology (max. 7 pages) • Quality management (max. 1 page) • Project management (max. 1 page) • Resource management (proposal (max. 1 page) + CVs of experts)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!