Crew Performance Evaluations Sample Clauses

Crew Performance Evaluations. Crew Performance Ratings (ICS 224 or equivalent) from wildfire suppression or prescribed fire assignments for 2013-2016, in which crews were utilized under the IFCA, will be used for this Section. If the Proposer was listed as an owner, Director or Officer of a corporation, partner or limited partner of a partnership or joint venture, or a member or manager of a limited liability company under the 2013 IFCA, Crew Performance Ratings (ICS 224 or equivalent) will not need to be submitted since they are already on file with ODF and will be utilized for this section. However, Proposer must submit the name of the company in which they were associated with (as allowed above) for the 2013 IFCA for consideration of Crew Performance Evaluations, if applicable. If Proposer did not participate as a Contractor in the above capacity for the 2013 IFCA, the Proposer may submit all 2013-2016 evaluations for consideration for this Section from the National Type 2-IA Firefighter Crew Contract (NCC) if Proposer had an NCC during that time period. If Proposer did not have any Crew Performance Ratings under the IFCA or NCC during the 2013-2016 time period, Proposer must provide a statement to that fact, and no points will be given for this section.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Crew Performance Evaluations. ODF will consider this past performance information based on Crew Performance Ratings (ICS 224 or equivalent) from wildfire suppression or prescribed burn assignments for 2013-2016 in which crews were utilized under the IFCA, or in some cases, the National Type 2-IA Firefighter Crew Contract as described in D.6.2. ODF will provide the scoring for this section based upon the following analysis. Points are based on marks given in the Superior/Satisfactory/Needs Improvement (or equivalent) categories as indicated on the Ratings. If there are positive or negative written remarks that indicate highly exceptional or very inadequate performance, the total number of points is further increased or decreased by 10% of a score value. Some crews may have performed different tasks and will receive marks in more or fewer categories than other crews. Therefore, each crew’s score is the fraction of the total number of points they could have scored. The process will then find the average of a company’s crew scores for each of the past four years. To find the overall score for a company across all four years, all four years of data are considered, but the most recent years are weighted more heavily, contributing more to the final score. If companies did not have recorded evaluations for two or more of the past four years, final scores may be reduced slightly.
Sample 1

Related to Crew Performance Evaluations

  • Contractor Performance Evaluations The Contract Administrator will evaluate Contractor’s performance as often as the Contract Administrator deems necessary throughout the term of the contract. This evaluation will be based on criteria including the quality of goods or services, the timeliness of performance, and adherence to applicable laws, including prevailing wage and living wage. City will provide Contractors who receive an unsatisfactory rating with a copy of the evaluation and an opportunity to respond. City may consider final evaluations, including Contractor’s response, in evaluating future proposals and bids for contract award.

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • Employee Performance Evaluations Any employee performance evaluation shall be prepared by the employee's supervisor who has the responsibility and authority to prepare such reports. Employee performance evaluation reports shall be discussed with the employee prior to finalization of each category of the report. An employee will receive an appointment with his/her department's reviewing officer to discuss the evaluation by signing the evaluation form in the space provided. Each department shall make a reasonable effort to ensure that the reviewing officer for this purpose has not been a party to the preparation of the evaluation. In no case shall the reviewing officer sign the evaluation form until a review has occurred. Any regular or special evaluation with a rating of "unsatisfactory" shall include plans for employee development. Except in cases of termination, release from probation, or leave of absence, employees who receive an unsatisfactory performance evaluation must receive a follow-up evaluation. The follow-up evaluation shall cover a period of time no greater than ninety (90) calendar days from the date of the final review of the initial unsatisfactory evaluation. An employee shall have the right to submit written comments regarding any evaluation and to have such comments included in his/her personnel file along with the evaluation.

  • EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Purpose: To provide the policy and procedures for assessing employee performance and communicating the results of assessment to the employee and to others using assessment information in personnel decisions, and further to express the mutual commitment of the parties to the University’s values.

  • COMPLIANCE AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Two (2) Mandatory Compliance and Performance Evaluation Meetings shall be conducted during each Term of this Agreement. Additional meetings may be scheduled at the discretion of Department to ensure Concessionaire’s effectiveness and compliance. The meetings shall review all aspects of the Concession Operation, ensuring that quality public services are being provided on a continuing basis in accordance with the Bid Specifications and this Agreement, that operational problems/concerns are addressed on a timely basis, and that all terms and conditions are clearly understood. The meetings shall be held on site with Department-designated State Park Service staff representative(s), the on-site concession manager, and a management/supervisory representative of Concessionaire’s firm. A report form shall be utilized to document the meeting, and to identify any deficiencies and the corrective action required. A copy of the completed report form shall be provided to the on- site concession manager or the management/supervisory representative of Concessionaire’s firm and shall be attached to and made a part of this Agreement. The Mandatory Compliance and Performance Evaluation Meetings shall be held as follows: • Meeting #1 - Prior to commencement of the Period of Operation or Memorial Day, whichever comes first. • Meeting #2 - Within ten (10) calendar days after the last approved day of the Period of Operation.

  • Quarterly Contractor Performance Reporting Customers shall complete a Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit I) for each Contractor on a Quarterly basis. Customers will electronically submit the completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) to the Department Contract Manager no later than the due date indicated in Contract Exhibit D, Section 17, Additional Special Contract Conditions. The completed Contractor Performance Survey(s) will be used by the Department as a performance-reporting tool to measure the performance of Contractors. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MyFloridaMarketPlace or on the Department's website).

  • SCHEDULE FOR PERFORMANCE REVIEWS 8.1 The performance of each Employee in relation to his/her performance agreement shall be reviewed on the following dates with the understanding that reviews in the first and third quarter may be verbal if performance is satisfactory:

  • CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE AUDIT The Contractor shall allow the Authorized User to assess Contractor’s performance by providing any materials requested in the Authorized User Agreement (e.g., page load times, response times, uptime, and fail over time). The Authorized User may perform this Contractor performance audit with a third party at its discretion, at the Authorized User’s expense. The Contractor shall perform an independent audit of its Data Centers, at least annually, at Contractor expense. The Contractor will provide a data owner facing audit report upon request by the Authorized User. The Contractor shall identify any confidential, trade secret, or proprietary information in accordance with Appendix B, Section 9(a), Confidential/Trade Secret Materials.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.