Experiment Methodology Sample Clauses

Experiment Methodology. A heuristic problem discovery experiment design was implemented to qualitatively evaluate crowd simulation software documented in D6.8 using the Unity cross-platform game engine. This design approach applied Human-Computer Interaction methodologies specifically designed to explore the functionality, usability, and user experience of the tool. We also recorded the user sessions in order to calculate the time taken on individual tasks. A remote participation procedure was used to record participant data. This approach to analysis was implemented due to the infeasibility of in-person participation due to COVID-19. Recruitment took place in the Republic of Ireland and UK for 2 months, from October to November 2020. Unity experts were targeted via xxxxxx.xxx, xxxxxx.xxx, and advertisements posted to Irish game development groups and forums. Potential participants were also invited via direct email. A research information sheet was provided at this time, outlining the research motivations and execution procedures. Participants were encouraged to discuss the contents of the Research Information sheet in advance of the experiment. After the invited responses were processed, participants were allocated a date and time to remotely undertake the crowd simulation process.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Experiment Methodology designedUsing testedBy realisedBy usedBy implementedBy implementedBy structuredBy formalisedBy characterisedBy qualitiesDefinedBy Figure 1. Schematic showing the main links between the methodology and related activities.

Related to Experiment Methodology

  • Payment Methodology The Contractor shall be compensated based on the Service Rates in Attachment for units of service authorized by the Institution in a total amount not to exceed the Contract Maximum Liability established in Section C. 1. The Contractor’s compensation shall be contingent upon the satisfactory completion of units of service or project milestones identified in Attachment B. The Contractor shall submit invoices, in form and substance acceptable to the Institution with all of the necessary supporting documentation, prior to any payment. Such invoices shall be submitted for completed units of service or project milestones for the amount stipulated.

  • Methodology 1. The price at which the Assuming Institution sells or disposes of Qualified Financial Contracts will be deemed to be the fair market value of such contracts, if such sale or disposition occurs at prevailing market rates within a predefined timetable as agreed upon by the Assuming Institution and the Receiver. 2. In valuing all other Qualified Financial Contracts, the following principles will apply:

  • Claims Review Methodology ‌‌ a. C laims Review Population. A description of the Population subject‌‌ to the Quarterly Claims Review.

  • RE-WEIGHING PRODUCT Deliveries are subject to re- weighing at the point of destination by the Authorized User. If shrinkage occurs which exceeds that normally allowable in the trade, the Authorized User shall have the option to require delivery of the difference in quantity or to reduce the payment accordingly. Such option shall be exercised in writing by the Authorized User.

  • Measurement method An isolation resistance test instrument is connected between the live parts and the electrical chassis. The isolation resistance is subsequently measured by applying a DC voltage at least half of the working voltage of the high voltage bus. If the system has several voltage ranges (e.g. because of boost converter) in conductively connected circuit and some of the components cannot withstand the working voltage of the entire circuit, the isolation resistance between those components and the electrical chassis can be measured separately by applying at least half of their own working voltage with those components disconnected.

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods and Works International Competitive Bidding. Goods and works shall be procured under contracts awarded on the basis of International Competitive Bidding.

  • Benchmarking 19.1 The Parties shall comply with the provisions of Framework Schedule 12 (Continuous Improvement and Benchmarking) in relation to the benchmarking of any or all of the Goods and/or Services.

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Particular Methods of Procurement of Goods Works and Services (other than Consultants’ Services)

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!