Fear, Distrust and Uncertainty Sample Clauses

Fear, Distrust and Uncertainty. The perceived susceptibility to cholera was also very similar across regions and did not seem to be greatly affected by where a person lived. All communities expressed fear of cholera and worried about it affecting themselves, their families or communities. This was perhaps most interesting in regards to the issues surrounding the causes or origins of cholera in Haiti. Regardless of location, communities all described receiving cholera prevention messages explaining that it was a “mikwob” or “microbe” that could enter the body through unclean water or contaminated food. Each group described the same basic list of prevention strategies. But also, regardless of their location each community expressed doubt about the reliability or truth of these messages. Although the ways that they described these doubts and confusion varied by community, all reported a large uncertainty about cholera that led some in the community to question whether it could actually be prevented. There were several similarities between themes that arose in our data and those reported by (Grimaud & Xxxxxxxxx, 2011) about perceptions of cholera in Haiti. Like us, they found that people were doubtful of the causes of cholera. Interestingly, the communities the Haitian Red Cross spoke with expressed their doubts in much of the same way as the people who participated in our FGDs. We both found that communities talked about beliefs that “Mikwob pa touye Ayisyen” or “Microbes don’t kill Haitians”, cholera did not come from a natural source, and that behaviors people had been doing their whole lives could not just suddenly cause them to get cholera(Grimaud & Xxxxxxxxx, 2011). (Grimaud & Xxxxxxxxx, 2011) also reported the community’s suspicions that cholera was political or may have been purposefully brought by foreigners. Interestingly, while Grimaud and Leganeur do not report any story of “cholera helicopters”, they do talk about “cholera powder” that many community members believed had been dumped into community water sources by vodou practitioners. The Red Cross findings overlap with our Labutik focus group’s story about the “cholera powder” sprinkled out of helicopters by “white people” (foreigners) and Boden’s discussion of “makanda” or “witchcraft” being the reason for cholera. These findings have important implications for the public health response to cholera. While messages are reaching many regions of Haiti, they are equally distrusted. The ability to send information to even the most ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Fear, Distrust and Uncertainty

  • Recourse to Agencies or Courts of Competent Jurisdiction Notwithstanding Section 11.2, nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the rights of a Party to file a complaint with the FERC under relevant provisions of the Federal Power Act or with the PUCO under relevant provisions of the Legal Authorities. The Parties’ agreement under this Section 11.3 is without prejudice to any Party’s right to contest jurisdiction of the FERC or PUCO to which a complaint is brought.

  • Legal venue The terms and conditions of this Contract shall be construed, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the applicable laws of the State of Colorado. If any legal action is necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of this Contract, the parties agree that the jurisdiction and venue for bringing such action shall be in the appropriate court in Xxxxxxxxx County, Colorado. The prevailing party in any action to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall collect all reasonable costs and expenses incurred in such action, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney’s fees

  • Waiver of Trial by Jury Each party hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives the right to a trial by jury in any action, suit, counterclaim or other proceeding (whether based on contract, tort or otherwise) arising out of, connected with or relating to this Agreement, the transactions contemplated hereby, or the actions of the Investor in the negotiation, administration, performance or enforcement hereof.

  • Law, Venue 19.1. This Agreement has been executed and delivered in the State of California and the validity, enforceability and interpretation of any of the clauses of this Agreement shall be determined and governed by the laws of the State of California.

  • Indemnity Limitation with TIPS Members Texas and other states restrict by law or state Constitution the ability of a governmental entity to indemnify others. TIPS requires that any contract entered into between a vendor and TIPS or a TIPS Member as a result of an award under this Solicitation limit the requirement that the Customer indemnify the Vendor by either eliminating any such indemnity requirement clauses in any agreements, contracts or other binding documents OR by prefacing all indemnity clauses required of TIPS or the TIPS Member entity with the following: "To the extent permitted by the laws or the Constitution of the state where the customer resides, ". Agreement is a required condition to award of a contract resulting from this Solicitation. Agreed

  • Limitation on Judicial Council 's Liability The Judicial Council will not be responsible for loss or damage to any non-Judicial Council equipment or property arising from causes beyond the Judicial Council's control. In any event, the Judicial Council's responsibility for repairs and liability for damages or loss shall be limited to that made necessary by or resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Judicial Council or its officers, employees, or agents. The Judicial Council will not be liable for any charges incurred in connection with this Program, or any Judicial Council activities, unless expressly provided for under this Agreement.

  • Program Requirements Provided At No Charge to the Judicial Council A. The Contractor shall provide the following items during the Program at no charge to the Judicial Council:

  • Administrative and Operating Expenses Charged to the Judicial Council The Judicial Council may reimburse the Contractor for itemized administrative and operating expenses, pursuant to this exhibit, that are reasonable, allowable, and allocable in performing the Work of this Agreement, provided that the Judicial Council first approves such charges via one (1) or more BEO’s that set forth the final details on these items.

  • INTERPRETATION; VENUE This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit, and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, in and for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law, and in the Southern District of Florida for claims justiciable in federal court. * * *

  • Agreement Made in California; Venue The formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for all litigation relative to the formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be in San Francisco.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.