Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program Sample Clauses

Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program. The FGDC CAP Grant has been a very beneficial program to assist metadata development and progress. Having received these grants for several years has allowed the NBII to assist hundreds of people and organizations create metadata and post it to Clearinghouses, which is beneficial to the science community and other research and learning communities. I would like to see the FGDC host a post CAP Grant meeting in which those organizations that were awarded funding can present the results of their projects. By sharing successes and challenges, new partnerships could be formed, progress could be seen, and the energy already developed from the success of the projects could be extended to the future.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program. What are the CAP Program strengths and weaknesses? The strength of the program comes from the varied types of grants that are available in order to assist with advancement of GIS initiatives and programs. In my experience, I did not encounter any weaknesses. Where does it make a difference? It makes a huge difference. Through the relatively small amount of money we received (less than $50,000), we were able to conduct multiple outreach sessions, get local government buy-in to the program, develop a strategic plan, research funding options, create speaking points for talking with decision makers, and ultimately begin to collate additional layers for our SSDI. Without the assistance from the CAP grant, we would not have been able to get a neutral seasoned third party to assist with the effort. Without the neutral, seasoned facilitator, it is firmly believed that most, if not all of the work completed, would not have been possible. Was the assistance you received sufficient or effective? Yes – it was both sufficient and extremely effective. This level of “seed money” was crucial to the project. What would you recommend that the FGDC do differently? No suggestions at this time. Are there factors that are missing or additional needs that should be considered? No suggestions at this time. Are there program management concerns that need to be addressed, such as the time frame? Having a one year timeframe is not long enough, given the procurement vehicles in South Carolina, as well as the logistical planning required to bring in all necessary parties. However, because the CAP grant program allows for extensions, with the added time, everything was able to be completed. If you were to do this again, what would you do differently?
Sample 1
Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program. What are the program strengths and weaknesses? Strength - provides support to NSDI-cooperative efforts and activities. Weakness - limited funds, one-time-only support Where does the program make a difference? Where there are interested people who are willing to donate time and effort. Was the assistance you received sufficient or effective? It was sufficient for the task proposed. It was efficient (three additional workshops were conducted.) It would have been more effective if the full scope of work could have been funded (a $ 66,000 proposal, previously submitted). What would you recommend doing differently? Enabling successful projects to be continued over several years. And of course, providing more funds for the purpose. No. Are there factors that are missing or need to consider that were missed? Are there program management concerns that need to be addressed? Time frame? The on-line grant application and registration method is difficult, time-consuming, frustrating, and unproductive.
Sample 1
Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program. What are the program strengths and weaknesses? Where does the program make a difference? Was the assistance you received sufficient or effective? What would you recommend doing differently? Are there factors that are missing or need to consider that were missed? Are there program management concerns that need to be addressed? Time frame? If you were to do this again, what would you do differently? Attachment E NSDI Cooperative Agreements Program
Sample 1
Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program. The necessary resources to fulfill a comprehensive strategic planning effort could not have been accomplished without efforts of the CAP through the partnership with FGDC and USGS. This funding allowed us to hire an outside professional to provide experience and perspectives that we would have not otherwise provided for this project. The FGDC was flexible in allowing us to extend the completion of the project as to allow transition in new management and coordination within our state to fulfill the objectives of the project. If we would have conducted the project again we would try to secure additional matching dollars to further complete business plans.
Sample 1

Related to Feedback on Cooperative Agreements Program

  • Cooperative Agreement The provisions and pricing of this Contract will be extended to other California local or state governmental entities. Governmental entities wishing to use this Contract will be responsible for issuing their own purchase documents/price agreements, providing for their own acceptance, and making any subsequent payments. Contractor shall be required to include in any Contract entered into with another agency or entity that is entered into as an extension of this Contract a Contract clause that will hold harmless the County of Orange from all claims, demands, actions or causes of actions of every kind resulting directly or indirectly, arising out of, or in any way connected with the use of this contract. Failure to do so will be considered a material breach of this Contract and grounds for immediate Contract termination. The cooperative entities are responsible for obtaining all certificates of insurance and bonds required. The Contractor is responsible for providing each cooperative entity a copy of the Contract upon request by the cooperative entity. The County of Orange makes no guarantee of usage by other users of this Contract. The Contractor shall be required to maintain a list of the cooperative entities using this Contract. The list shall report dollar volumes spent annually and shall be provided on an annual basis to the County, at the County’s request.

  • STRUCTURE AND CONTENT OF COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT C1.1 Separate Central and Local terms

  • Areas of Cooperation The Parties will cooperate, in particular, in the following areas of common interest:

  • Printing of Collective Agreement The Hospital and Union agree that the cost of printing the collective agreements will be shared equally between the parties. The Union will be responsible for having the collective agreements printed in booklet format within sixty (60) days of its signing by both parties.

  • Financing Cooperation (a) EchoStar shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries to, use reasonable best efforts to provide such assistance as reasonably requested by DISH in connection with financing arrangements (including assumptions, guarantees, amendments, supplements, modifications, refinancings, replacements, repayments, terminations or prepayments of existing financing arrangements) as DISH may reasonably determine necessary or advisable in connection with the completion of the Merger or the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. Such assistance shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (a) providing such information and making available such personnel as DISH may reasonably request, including the preparation and furnishing in a timely fashion of all financial statements and other data customary to be included in connection therewith (including all audited financial statements, all unaudited financial statements (which shall have been reviewed by the independent accounting firm for EchoStar as provided in the procedures specified by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in AU 722)) and all information regarding EchoStar and its Subsidiaries reasonably required for DISH to prepare pro forma financial statements, financial data, audit reports and other information regarding EchoStar and its Subsidiaries of the type required by and in compliance with Regulation S-X and Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act and related forms; (b) participation in, and assistance with, any marketing activities related to such financing; (c) participation by senior management of EchoStar in, and their assistance with, the preparation of rating agency presentations and meetings with rating agencies; (d) taking such actions as are reasonably requested by DISH or its financing sources to facilitate the satisfaction of all conditions precedent to obtaining such financing; and (e) assisting in any exchange transactions or consents with respect to the EchoStar Indentures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, EchoStar and its Subsidiaries shall not be required pursuant to this Section 4.19 to (1) enter into any letter, certificate, document, agreement or instrument (other than customary authorization and representation letters and notices) that will be effective prior to the Closing (or that will otherwise be effective if the Closing does not occur), (2) take any action to the extent it would unreasonably disrupt the business or operations of EchoStar and the EchoStar Subsidiaries (taken as a whole) or require any of them to take any actions that would reasonably be expected to violate any applicable Legal Requirement, any Contract or their respective Organizational Documents, (3) provide any information to the extent such information would not be required to be provided pursuant to Section 4.8(a), (4) take any actions, or omit to take an action, that would reasonably be expected to result in any personal liability for the directors, officers, employees or stockholders of EchoStar or any of its Subsidiaries, (5) provide any information that cannot be provided without unreasonable burden or expense or (6) take any action, or omit to take an action, that would reasonably be expected to cause any representation, warranty or covenant in this Agreement to be breached by EchoStar or any of its Subsidiaries (unless waived by DISH) or cause any closing condition set forth in Article V to fail to be satisfied. EchoStar hereby consents to DISH’s use of and reliance on any audited or unaudited financial statements relating to EchoStar and the consolidated EchoStar Subsidiaries, including any filings that DISH desires to make with the SEC. In addition, EchoStar will use reasonable best efforts, at DISH’s sole cost and expense, to obtain the consents of any auditor to the inclusion of the financial statements referenced above in appropriate filings with the SEC.

  • OBLIGATIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF CONTRACTOR AS BUSINESS ASSOCIATE 1. Contractor agrees not to use or further disclose PHI County discloses to Contractor other than as permitted or required by this Business Associate Contract or as required by law.

  • General Cooperation (a) The Parties shall each cooperate fully (and each shall cause its respective Subsidiaries to cooperate fully) with all reasonable requests in writing (“Information Request”) from another Party hereto, or from an agent, representative or advisor to such Party, in connection with the preparation and filing of Tax Returns (including the preparation of Tax Packages), claims for Refunds, Tax Proceedings, and calculations of amounts required to be paid pursuant to this Agreement, in each case, related or attributable to or arising in connection with Taxes of any of the Parties or their respective Subsidiaries covered by this Agreement and the establishment of any reserve required in connection with any financial reporting (a “Tax Matter”). Such cooperation shall include the provision of any information reasonably necessary or helpful in connection with a Tax Matter (“Information”) and shall include, without limitation, at each Party’s own cost:

  • Dissemination of Research Findings and Acknowledgement of Controlled-Access Datasets Subject to the NIH GDS Policy It is NIH’s intent to promote the dissemination of research findings from use of controlled-access dataset(s) subject to the NIH GDS Policy as widely as possible through scientific publication or other appropriate public dissemination mechanisms. Approved Users are strongly encouraged to publish their results in peer-reviewed journals and to present research findings at scientific meetings.

  • Cooperation Agreement At the Closing, PCC and Buyer shall, and PCC shall cause PCC Parent to, execute and deliver the Cooperation Agreement pursuant to which Buyer, PCC Parent and PCC shall provide each other certain information and other assistance in connection with the collection, administration and/or satisfaction of certain of the Retained Liabilities.

  • Academic Policies and Student Support Services X. Xxxx College courses offered as dual credit, regardless of where they are taught, follow the same syllabus, course outline, textbook, grading method, and other academic policies and procedures as the courses outlined in the Hill College policy manual, catalog, and student handbook. [TAC 19, Part 1, Chapter 4, Subchapter D, 4.85(g)(1)]

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.