Common use of Final Summative Evaluation Clause in Contracts

Final Summative Evaluation. 1. The evaluator shall prepare a written summative evaluation report which shall be delivered to the Unit Member no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the end of the school year. (See Certificated: Summative Evaluation Report Form Appendix Section 1F). 2. The Summative Evaluation shall include ratings based on The California Standards for the Teaching Profession, Performance Goals and job description, and indicate if the Unit Member’s overall performance is: 1) Satisfactory – meets and/or exceeds standards; 2) Satisfactory with improvement needed (Improvement Plan needed); or 3) Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards (required to participate in PAR). 3. If the Unit Member’s evaluation is “unsatisfactory” or is “satisfactory with improvement needed” the summative evaluation must include recommendations for improvement. An Improvement Plan will be developed within ten (10) working days and attached to the summative evaluation. The evaluator and Unit Member shall attempt to mutually agree on the procedures. In the event agreement cannot be reached, the evaluator will determine the plan. 4. The Improvement Plan shall include a timeline and a statement of areas of performance needing improvement. It shall also specify the Unit Member’s responsibility and District assistance. These recommendations can be modified or added to by mutual agreement during the next employment year. Release time may be provided if the District considers it appropriate. The Unit Member must show a strict adherence to the specific recommendations. 5. If the evaluator and the Unit Member agree that subsequent remedial action has corrected the identified deficiencies, a statement of such improvement shall be included in the next evaluation. 6. If at completion of the timeline for the improvement plan, the District determines that the deficiencies have not been corrected, an involuntary transfer or a reassignment may be made as a further effort to provide an opportunity for the Unit Member to improve. 7. Unit members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation will be referred to the Peer Assistance and Review Program under Article XVIII. Participation in PAR is mandatory for Unit Members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation. 8. The Unit Member shall acknowledge the evaluator’s summative evaluation by signing it. This signature does not acknowledge agreement with the summative evaluation, but only that a copy was received and read. Unit Members may request copies of evaluation data presented at the summative evaluation conference. 9. The Unit Member has the right to attach a response to his/her own summative evaluation. Such a statement shall be part of his/her permanent file and shall be submitted within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Final Summative Evaluation. 1. The evaluator shall prepare a written summative evaluation report which shall be delivered to the Unit Member no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the end of the school year. (See Certificated: Summative Evaluation Report Form Appendix Section 1F). 2. The Summative Evaluation shall include ratings based on The California Standards for the Teaching Profession, Performance Goals and job description, and indicate if the Unit Member’s overall performance is: 1) Satisfactory – meets and/or exceeds standards; 2) Satisfactory with improvement needed (Improvement Plan needed); or 3) Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards (required to participate in PAR). 3. If the Unit Member’s evaluation is “unsatisfactory” or is “satisfactory with improvement needed” the summative evaluation must include recommendations for improvement. An Improvement Plan will be developed within ten (10) working days and attached to the summative evaluation. The evaluator and Unit Member shall attempt to mutually agree on the procedures. In the event agreement cannot be reached, the evaluator will determine the plan. 4. The Improvement Plan shall include a timeline and a statement of areas of performance needing improvement. It shall also specify the Unit Member’s responsibility and District assistance. These recommendations can be modified or added to by mutual agreement during the next employment year. Release time may be provided if the District considers it appropriate. The Unit Member must show a strict adherence to the specific recommendations. 5. If the evaluator and the Unit Member agree that subsequent remedial action has corrected the identified deficiencies, a statement of such improvement shall be included in the next evaluation. 6. If at completion of the timeline for the improvement plan, the District determines that the deficiencies have not been corrected, an involuntary transfer or a reassignment may be made as a further effort to provide an opportunity for the Unit Member to improve. 7. Unit members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation will be referred to the Peer Assistance and Review Program under Article XVIII. Participation in PAR is mandatory for Unit Members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation.will 8. The Unit Member shall acknowledge the evaluator’s summative evaluation by signing it. This signature does not acknowledge agreement with the summative evaluation, but only that a copy was received and read. Unit Members may request copies of evaluation data presented at the summative evaluation conference. 9. The Unit Member has the right to attach a response to his/her own summative evaluation. Such a statement shall be part of his/her permanent file and shall be submitted within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement

Final Summative Evaluation. 1. The evaluator shall prepare a written summative evaluation report which shall be delivered to the Unit Member no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the end of the school year. (See Certificated: Summative Evaluation Report Form Appendix Section 1F). 2. The Summative Evaluation shall include ratings based on The California Standards for the Teaching Profession, Performance Goals and job description, and indicate if the Unit Member’s overall performance is: 1) Satisfactory – meets and/or exceeds standards; 2) Satisfactory with improvement needed (Improvement Plan needed); or 3) Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards (required to participate in PAR). 3. If the Unit Member’s evaluation is “unsatisfactory” or is “satisfactory with improvement needed” the summative evaluation must include recommendations for improvement. An Improvement Plan will be developed within ten (10) working days and attached to the summative evaluation. The evaluator and Unit Member shall attempt to mutually agree on the procedures. In the event agreement cannot be reached, the evaluator will determine the plan. 4. The Improvement Plan shall include a timeline and a statement of areas of performance needing improvement. It shall also specify the Unit Member’s responsibility and District assistance. These recommendations can be modified or added to by mutual agreement during the next employment year. Release time may be provided if the District considers it appropriate. The Unit Member must show a strict adherence to the specific recommendations. 5. If the evaluator and the Unit Member agree that subsequent remedial action has corrected the identified deficiencies, a statement of such improvement shall be included in the next evaluation. 6. If at completion of the timeline for the improvement plan, the District determines that the deficiencies have not been corrected, an involuntary transfer or a reassignment may be made as a further effort to provide an opportunity for the Unit Member to improve.be 7. Unit members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation will be referred to the Peer Assistance and Review Program under Article XVIII. Participation in PAR is mandatory for Unit Members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation. 8. The Unit Member shall acknowledge the evaluator’s summative evaluation by signing it. This signature does not acknowledge agreement with the summative evaluation, but only that a copy was received and read. Unit Members may request copies of evaluation data presented at the summative evaluation conference. 9. The Unit Member has the right to attach a response to his/her own summative evaluation. Such a statement shall be part of his/her permanent file and shall be submitted within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement

Final Summative Evaluation. 1. The evaluator shall prepare a written summative evaluation report which shall be delivered to the Unit Member no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the end of the school year. (See Certificated: Summative Evaluation Report Form Appendix Section 1F). 2. The Summative Evaluation shall include ratings based on The California Standards for the Teaching Profession, Performance Goals and job description, and indicate if the Unit Member’s overall performance is: 1) Satisfactory – meets and/or exceeds standards; 2) Satisfactory with improvement needed (Improvement Plan needed); or 3) Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards (required to participate in PAR). 3. If the Unit Member’s evaluation is “unsatisfactory” or is “satisfactory with improvement needed” the summative evaluation must include recommendations for improvement. An Improvement Plan will be developed within ten (10) working days and attached to the summative evaluation. The evaluator and Unit Member shall attempt to mutually agree on the procedures. In the event agreement cannot be reached, the evaluator will determine the plan. 4. The Improvement Plan shall include a timeline and a statement of areas of performance needing improvement. It shall also specify the Unit Member’s responsibility and District assistance. These recommendations can be modified or added to by mutual agreement during the next employment year. Release time may be provided if the District considers it appropriate. The Unit Member must show a strict adherence to the specific recommendations. 5. If the evaluator and the Unit Member agree that subsequent remedial action has corrected the identified deficiencies, a statement of such improvement shall be included in the next evaluation. 6. If at completion of the timeline for the improvement plan, the District determines that the deficiencies have not been corrected, an involuntary transfer or a reassignment may be made as a further effort to provide an opportunity for the Unit Member to improve. 7. Unit members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation will be referred to the Peer Assistance and Review Program under Article XVIII. Participation in PAR is mandatory for Unit Members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation.does 8. The Unit Member shall acknowledge the evaluator’s summative evaluation by signing it. This signature does not acknowledge agreement with the summative evaluation, but only that a copy was received and read. Unit Members may request copies of evaluation data presented at the summative evaluation conference. 9. The Unit Member has the right to attach a response to his/her own summative evaluation. Such a statement shall be part of his/her permanent file and shall be submitted within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Final Summative Evaluation. 1. The evaluator shall prepare a written summative evaluation report which shall be delivered to the Unit Member no later than thirty (30) calendar days prior to the end of the school year. (See Certificated: Summative Evaluation Report Form Appendix Section 1F). 2. The Summative Evaluation shall include ratings based on The California Standards for the Teaching Profession, Performance Goals and job description, and indicate if the Unit Member’s overall performance is: 1) Satisfactory – meets and/or exceeds standards; 2) Satisfactory with improvement needed (Improvement Plan needed); or 3) Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards (required to participate in PAR). 3. If the Unit Member’s evaluation is “unsatisfactory” or is “satisfactory with improvement needed” the summative evaluation must include recommendations for improvement. An Improvement Plan will be developed within ten (10) working days and attached to the summative evaluation. The evaluator and Unit Member shall attempt to mutually agree on the procedures. In the event agreement cannot be reached, the evaluator will determine the plan. 4. The Improvement Plan shall include a timeline and a statement of areas of performance needing improvement. It shall also specify the Unit Member’s responsibility and District assistance. These recommendations can be modified or added to by mutual agreement during the next employment year. Release time may be provided if the District considers it appropriate. The Unit Member must show a strict adherence to the specific recommendations. 5. If the evaluator and the Unit Member agree that subsequent remedial action has corrected the identified deficiencies, a statement of such improvement shall be included in the next evaluation. 6. If at completion of the timeline for the improvement plan, the District determines that the deficiencies have not been corrected, an involuntary transfer or a reassignment may be made as a further effort to provide an opportunity for the Unit Member to improve. 7. Unit members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation will be referred to the Peer Assistance and Review Program under Article XVIII. Participation in PAR is mandatory for Unit Members receiving an “Unsatisfactory – does not meet standards” evaluation. 8. The Unit Member shall acknowledge the evaluator’s summative evaluation by signing it. This signature does not acknowledge agreement with the summative evaluation, but only that a copy was received and read. Unit Members may request copies of evaluation data presented at the summative evaluation conference. 9. The Unit Member has the right to attach a response to his/her own summative evaluation. Such a statement shall be part of his/her permanent file and shall be submitted within twenty (20) calendar days of receipt of the evaluation.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!