Government-Mandated Capital Project Proposal Sample Clauses

Government-Mandated Capital Project Proposal. After consulting the Executive Committee, the Lessee shall submit a proposal with respect to any Government- Mandated Capital Project to the Signatory Airlines. The proposal shall be submitted to the Airlines in substantially the form attached as Schedule L and shall include a detailed description of the project (including the purpose or expected benefits of the project), a justification for the determination that the project is a Government-Mandated Capital Project, an evaluation of the project in comparison to other available alternatives for achieving compliance with the relevant Law or airport certification requirement, documentation that the Lessee intends to seek funds from all available Governmental Authority grant funding sources (including what those sources may be), the estimated completion date, the estimated costs of the project (including any costs for designing, constructing, equipping and financing the project), the proposed sources and uses of funds and the expected terms of financing (it being understood that the Lessee is not obligated to propose obtaining, or to subsequently obtain, equity financing as part of the financing of the project). The proposal shall also include a schedule of the annual amortized cost of the project and of the estimated increases to the Total Landing Contribution, Total Domestic Terminal Contribution, Total International Terminal Contribution and/or Total Local Terminal Contribution. The proposal must disclose any compensation to be received by the Lessee from any other party to contracts related to the project and the relationship between such party and the Lessee, if any. If an Airfield MII (with respect to a project attributable to the Airfield Area) or a Terminal MII (with respect to a project attributable to the Terminal), as the case may be (and in each case, each Airline determining in its discretion whether to participate in such Airfield MII or Terminal MII), disputes that the project qualifies as a Government-Mandated Capital Project and initiates the dispute resolution procedures in accordance with Article 11 within 90 days after the Lessee has submitted the proposal to the Signatory Airlines, the Lessee may not add the costs of the Government-Mandated Capital Project to the Landing Contribution, Total Domestic Terminal Contribution, Total International Terminal Contribution or Total Local Terminal Contribution in accordance with Section 6.3(d)(iv) or (v) until such dispute is resolved. For the avoid...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Government-Mandated Capital Project Proposal

  • Capital Projects 25.1 All capital projects, whether already underway or beginning during this period, are subject to the Department’s investment appraisal processes. Any capital expenditure that exceeds the BFI’s delegated capital limit must be referred to the DCMS Finance Committee for approval at three stages of development, as set out in guidance issued by the Department. The figure used in calculating whether the costs exceed the delegated limit is the lifetime cost of the capital project, including non- exchequer funding and any increased running costs ensuing from it.

  • Construction Change Directive A written order prepared and issued by the District, the Construction Manager, and/or the Architect and signed by the District and the Architect, directing a change in the Work.

  • Construction Change Directives 7.3.1 A Construction Change Directive is written order prepared by the Architect and signed by the Owner and Architect, directing a change in the Work and stating a proposed basis for adjustment, if any, in the Contract Sum, or Contract Time, or both. The Owner may by Construction Change Directive, without invalidating the Contract, order changes in the Work within the general scope of the Contract consisting of additions, deletions or other revisions, the Contract Sum and Contract Time being adjusting accordingly.

  • Project Approach € Project schedules and budgets are reviewed by the Project Manager on a weekly basis during our company-wide Project Managers Meeting using project status reports generated by our control software (Deltek Vision). Progress is compared to the schedule and budget to ensure adequate resources are available and that necessary coordination is occurring. Costs are reported real time, with actual labor based on time sheet entry and actual expense costs based on invoices. The reporting system can be customized to track specific tasks or efforts in multiple categories, making it flexible enough to adapt to any project specific requirements. We hold regular project coordination meetings to facilitate communication and information transfer among the design team. These meetings are held weekly and are supplemented with e-mail communication, as well as telephone conversations. We hold monthly project status meetings with your project manager to update project status, discuss priorities, and receive direction from City staff. This provides an opportunity for communication and information to flow openly between the City and the design team. These meetings are supplemented by communications that will occur via e-mail and telephone. We conduct meetings with other agencies and stakeholders impacted by the work as needed. E-mail and telephone communication work well for quick questions or minor issues, but we have found that the most effective means of communication with other agencies and stakeholders is the “old-fashioned” face- to-face mexxxxx. Xxbble’s record of providing quality civil engineering services to our clients reflects our ability to manage multiple projects effectively and efficiently. Our philosophy is that each project is personally overseen by one of our principal officers, thereby providing immediate attention to all project aspects (i.e. negotiations, communications, schedule, budgets).

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.