Impact of the JVA on fares Sample Clauses

Impact of the JVA on fares. In relation to the impact of the JVA on fares offered in the Kuala Lumpur – Denver market, the Commission found an increase of [✄] in the Parties’ average one-way economy class fares (2019 vs 2017). However, the Commission also found that the Parties’ fares were still consistently lower than their competitors. For example, the Parties’ average one-way economy class fare in 2019 was [✄] while their competitors’ was [✄]. Although there had been an increase in fares post-JVA, the Commission finds that price increases may be due to various factors which include, but are not limited to, inflation, demand, and variable costs. Furthermore, the fare increase is mitigated by the Parties having consistently lower fares than their competitors. Appendix V shows the chart illustrating the trend in the Parties and their competitors’ average one-way economy class fares for the Significant Relevant Markets assessed in Stage 3.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Impact of the JVA on fares. In relation to the impact of the JVA on fares in the Kuala Lumpur – Honolulu market, the Commission found that the Parties’ fares have shown to be lower when they were in a dominant position. The Commission found that the average fare offered by the Parties in 2018 when they were dominant was [✄]. Although the Parties’ average fare in 2019 was slightly higher than their competitors’ [✄], the Parties had a much lower market share than D7, which had a [✄] market share. As such, the Commission found that the JVA does not pose any detrimental effect neither in terms of fares for the Kuala Lumpur – Honolulu market nor on entry into the market by future competitors. Kuala Lumpur – Mexico City
Sample 1
Impact of the JVA on fares. In relation to fares, the Commission found that the Parties’ average economy fares were higher than their competitors in 2019 (Parties: [✄], Others: [✄]), the year in which their market share was the highest at [✄]. Since then, the Parties have lost a significant amount of market share and their average fares in 2021 were lower than their competitors’ (Parties: [✄], Others: [✄]). There is therefore little concern in terms of fares in this market.
Sample 1
Impact of the JVA on fares. The Commission found that the Parties’ average fare throughout 2019 has consistently been lower than their competitors' [✄]. The Parties’ average fares in 2021 were also lower than their competitors’ [✄]. In the absence of market power in the Kuala Lumpur – Seattle market, the Parties’ fares are expected to remain low for them to remain competitive in the market. As such, the JVA is unlikely to pose any detrimental effect in terms of fares for the Kuala Lumpur – Seattle market. Conclusion on subparagraph 50(c) of Act 771 90. The Commission, therefore, finds that there are no significant detrimental effects on competition or on consumers. While there has been some lessening of competition, such as in the Kuala Lumpur – Denver market, the Commission finds that any negative effect is mitigated and has also not been passed on to consumers. Therefore, on balance, the Commission finds that the benefits of the JVA outweigh the detrimental effects of the JVA on competition.
Sample 1
Impact of the JVA on fares. The Commission found that the Parties’ average fare throughout 2019 has consistently been lower than their competitors' (Parties: [✄], Others: [✄]). The Parties’ average fares in 2021 were also lower than their competitors’ (Parties: [✄], Others: [✄]). In the absence of market power in the Kuala Lumpur – Seattle market, the Parties’ fares are expected to remain low for them to remain competitive in the market. As such, the JVA is unlikely to pose any detrimental effect in terms of fares for the Kuala Lumpur – Seattle market. Conclusion on subparagraph 50(c) of Act 771 91. The Commission, therefore, finds that there are no significant detrimental effects on competition or on consumers. While there has been some lessening of competition, such as in the Kuala Lumpur – Denver market, the Commission finds that any negative effect is mitigated and has also not been passed on to consumers. Therefore, on balance, the Commission finds that the benefits of the JVA outweigh the detrimental effects of the JVA on competition.
Sample 1

Related to Impact of the JVA on fares

  • Common Areas - Changes Lessor shall have the right, in Lessor's sole discretion, from time to time: (a) To make changes to the Common Areas, including, without limitation, changes in the location, size, shape and number of driveways, entrances, parking spaces, parking areas, loading and unloading areas, ingress, egress, direction of traffic, landscaped areas, walkways and utility raceways; (b) To close temporarily any of the Common Areas for maintenance purposes so long as reasonable access to the Premises remains available; (c) To designate other land outside the boundaries of the Industrial Center to be a part of the Common Areas; (d) To add additional buildings and improvements to the Common Areas; (e) To use the Common Areas while engaged in making additional improvements, repairs or alterations to the Industrial Center, or any portion thereof; and (f) To do and perform such other acts and make such other changes in, to or with respect to the Common Areas and Industrial Center as Lessor may, in the exercise of sound business judgment, deem to be appropriate.

  • Prohibition on Political Activity with City Funds In accordance with San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 12.G, Contractor may not participate in, support, or attempt to influence any political campaign for a candidate or for a ballot measure (collectively, “Political Activity”) in the performance of the services provided under this Agreement. Contractor agrees to comply with San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 12.G and any implementing rules and regulations promulgated by the City’s Controller. The terms and provisions of Chapter 12.G are incorporated herein by this reference. In the event Contractor violates the provisions of this section, the City may, in addition to any other rights or remedies available hereunder, (i) terminate this Agreement, and (ii) prohibit Contractor from bidding on or receiving any new City contract for a period of two (2) years. The Controller will not consider Contractor’s use of profit as a violation of this section.

  • Emergency/Declared Disaster Requirements In the event of an emergency or if Orange County is declared a disaster area by the County, state or federal government, this Contract may be subjected to unusual usage. The Contractor shall service the County during such an emergency or declared disaster under the same terms and conditions that apply during non-emergency/disaster conditions. The pricing quoted by the Contractor shall apply to serving the County’s needs regardless of the circumstances. If the Contractor is unable to supply the goods/services under the terms of the Contract, then the Contractor shall provide proof of such disruption and a copy of the invoice for the goods/services from the Contractor’s supplier(s). Additional profit margin as a result of supplying goods/services during an emergency or a declared disaster shall not be permitted. In the event of an emergency or declared disaster, emergency purchase order numbers will be assigned. All applicable invoices from the Contractor shall show both the emergency purchase order number and the Contract number.

  • Unbundled Loop Modifications (Line Conditioning 2.5.1 Line Conditioning is defined as routine network modification that BellSouth regularly undertakes to provide xDSL services to its own customers. This may include the removal of any device, from a copper Loop or copper Subloop that may diminish the capability of the Loop or Subloop to deliver high-speed switched wireline telecommunications capability, including xDSL service. Such devices include, load coils, excessive bridged taps, low pass filters, and range extenders. Excessive bridged taps are bridged taps that serves no network design purpose and that are beyond the limits set according to industry standards and/or the BellSouth’s TR 73600 Unbundled Local Loop Technical Specification. 2.5.2 BellSouth will remove load coils only on copper Loops and Subloops that are less than eighteen thousand (18,000) feet in length. 2.5.3 For any copper loop being ordered by NewPhone which has over six thousand (6,000) feet of combined bridged tap will be modified, upon request from NewPhone, so that the loop will have a maximum of six thousand (6,000) feet of bridged tap. This modification will be performed at no additional charge to NewPhone. Loop conditioning orders that require the removal of bridged tap that serves no network design purpose on a copper Loop that will result in a combined total of bridged tap between two thousand five hundred (2,500) and six thousand (6,000) feet will be performed at the rates set forth in Exhibit A. 2.5.4 NewPhone may request removal of any unnecessary and non-excessive bridged tap (bridged tap between zero (0) and two thousand five hundred (2,500) feet which serves no network design purpose), at rates pursuant to BellSouth’s SC Process as mutually agreed to by the Parties. 2.5.5 Rates for ULM are as set forth in Exhibit A. 2.5.6 BellSouth will not modify a Loop in such a way that it no longer meets the technical parameters of the original Loop type (e.g., voice grade, ADSL, etc.) being ordered. 2.5.7 If NewPhone requests ULM on a reserved facility for a new Loop order, BellSouth may perform a pair change and provision a different Loop facility in lieu of the reserved facility with ULM if feasible. The Loop provisioned will meet or exceed specifications of the requested Loop facility as modified. NewPhone will not be charged for ULM if a different Loop is provisioned. For Loops that require a DLR or its equivalent, BellSouth will provide LMU detail of the Loop provisioned. 2.5.8 NewPhone shall request Loop make up information pursuant to this Attachment prior to submitting a service inquiry and/or a LSR for the Loop type that NewPhone desires BellSouth to condition. 2.5.9 When requesting ULM for a Loop that BellSouth has previously provisioned for NewPhone, NewPhone will submit a SI to BellSouth. If a spare Loop facility that meets the Loop modification specifications requested by NewPhone is available at the location for which the ULM was requested, NewPhone will have the option to change the Loop facility to the qualifying spare facility rather than to provide ULM. In the event that BellSouth changes the Loop facility in lieu of providing ULM, NewPhone will not be charged for ULM but will only be charged the service order charges for submitting an order.

  • TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGES 29.01 Any significant technological changes affecting members or their work environment will be discussed between Management and the Association prior to implementation with a view to resolving any problems. Whenever practical, the Board, through the Administration of the Service, will commence such discussions at least three (3) months in advance of the planned change.

  • Verizon OSS Facilities Any gateways, interfaces, databases, facilities, equipment, software, or systems, used by Verizon to provide Verizon OSS Services to ICG.

  • System Upgrade Facilities Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the NYISO OATT.

  • Emergency Situations If the condition is an emergency, this will be communicated to the Contractor with the request that corrections are to be accomplished immediately. The Contractor shall respond to the notice in emergency situations within twenty-four hours. If the Contractor fails to respond within this time limit, the Owner may correct the defect and charge the Contractor for the Work. If it is determined the complaint is not the responsibility of the Contractor, the Contractor shall be promptly paid for the cost of the corrective work. The Contractor shall give notice in writing to the Owner when corrections have been completed.

  • TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE 45.1 The parties have agreed that in cases where, as a result of technological change, the services of an employee are no longer required beyond a specified date because of lack of work or the discontinuance of a function, the Work Force Adjustment Policy concluded by the parties will apply. In all other cases, the following clauses will apply: 45.2 In this Article "Technological Change" means:

  • Prohibition on Use of Public Funds for Political Activity In performing the Services, Contractor shall comply with San Francisco Administrative Code Chapter 12G, which prohibits funds appropriated by the City for this Agreement from being expended to participate in, support, or attempt to influence any political campaign for a candidate or for a ballot measure. Contractor is subject to the enforcement and penalty provisions in Chapter 12G.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!