In-Process Review (IPR Sample Clauses

In-Process Review (IPR. At its discretion, the Government may conduct an In-Process-Review (IPR) to evaluate whether to continue activities covered by the Contract. Contractor shall provide a presentation detailing technical progress made towards completion of milestones following a prescribed template provided by the Government at an agreed upon date. The IPR will typically be conducted at DHHS facilities in Washington, DC. The Contractor will be notified by the Government of its intention to hold an IPR at least 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled IPR Presentation. Contractor shall provide final presentation 10 business days prior to each IPR Presentation. Contractor shall submit written justification of progress towards satisfying success criteria. The Government will provide written or verbal comments, as appropriate, if the Contractor provides a draft prior to a submitting a final presentation.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
In-Process Review (IPR. At its discretion, the Government may conduct an In-Process-Review (IPR) to evaluate whether to continue activities covered by the Contract. Contractor shall provide a presentation detailing technical progress made towards completion of milestones following a prescribed template provided by the Government at an agreed upon date. The IPR will typically be conducted at DHHS facilities in Washington, DC. The Contractor will be notified by the Government of its intention to hold an IPR at least 30 calendar days prior to the scheduled IPR Presentation. 1 FAR 27.408 permits the Government to obtain less than unlimited rights in data in the event of a cost- sharing contract. A Data Assertions Table has been compiled, and is included as Attachment 4. Contractor shall provide final presentation 10 business days prior to each IPR Presentation. Contractor shall submit written justification of progress towards satisfying success criteria. The Government will provide written or verbal comments, as appropriate, if the Contractor provides a draft prior to a submitting a final presentation.

Related to In-Process Review (IPR

  • Readiness Review Includes all plans to be implemented in one or more Service Areas on the anticipated Operational Start Date. At a minimum, the HMO shall, for each HMO Program:

  • Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.

  • Project Review A. Programmatic Allowances

  • Contract Review Agent shall have reviewed all material contracts of Borrowers including, without limitation, leases, union contracts, labor contracts, vendor supply contracts, license agreements and distributorship agreements and such contracts and agreements shall be satisfactory in all respects to Agent;

  • BUSINESS REVIEWS Supplier must perform a minimum of one business review with Sourcewell per contract year. The business review will cover sales to Participating Entities, pricing and contract terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Systems Review The Construction Administrator will conduct reviews of proposed roof, structural, mechanical, electrical, plumbing, conveyance, sprinkler, telecommunications, and life safety systems, and will consider initial cost, availability, impact on the overall program, comfort and convenience, long-term maintenance and operating costs, and impacts on schedule.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 9. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan. SCHEDULE 5

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Joint Review JADRC may, at the request of either party, review issues arising from the application of this Article.

  • Review Process A/E's Work Product will be reviewed by County under its applicable technical requirements and procedures, as follows:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.