INCONSISTENCY WITH FEDERAL LAW. Any apparent inconsistency between Federal Law(s) and regulation(s) and the terms and conditions of this Award must be immediately referred to the ARPA-E Contracting Officer for resolution through a written notification providing the following information: (i) the Prime Recipient’s award number; (ii) the name and contact information (postal address, telephone number, and email address) for the individual(s) to whom the ARPA-E Contracting Officer should direct any inquiries regarding this matter; and (iii) a detailed description of the apparent inconsistency.
INCONSISTENCY WITH FEDERAL LAW. If the Prime Recipient believes that any term or condition of this Award is inconsistent with Federal law(s) or regulation(s), the Prime Recipient is required to send an immediate written notification to the DOE Contracting Officer with the following information: (i) the Prime Recipient’s award number; (ii) the name and contact information (postal address, telephone number, and email address) for the individual(s) to whom the DOE Contracting Officer should direct any inquiries regarding this matter; and (iii) a detailed description of the apparent inconsistency. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE Any inconsistency in the terms and conditions of this Award shall be resolved by giving precedence to, in the following order, Attachment 6 (National Policy Assurances) to this Award; Attachment 2 (Intellectual Property Provisions) to this Award; DOE Financial Assistance Regulations, 10 C.F.R. Part 600, as amended; Attachment 1 (Special Terms and Conditions) to this Award; and If applicable, the Funding Opportunity Announcement, as amended. FEDERAL STEWARDSHIP AND SUBSTANTIAL INVOLVEMENT
INCONSISTENCY WITH FEDERAL LAW. If the Prime Recipient believes that any term or condition of this Award is inconsistent with Federal law(s) or regulation(s), the Prime Recipient is required to send an immediate written notification to the ARPA-E Contracting Officer with the following information: (i) the Prime Recipient’s award number; (ii) the name and contact information (postal address, telephone number, and email address) for the individual(s) to whom the ARPA-E Contracting Officer should direct any inquiries regarding this matter; and (iii) a detailed description of the apparent inconsistency. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE Any inconsistency in the terms and conditions of this Award shall be resolved by giving precedence to, in the following order, Attachment 6 (National Policy Assurances) to this Award; Attachment 2 (Intellectual Property Provisions) to this Award; DOE Financial Assistance Regulations, 10 C.F.R. Part 600, as amended; Attachment 1 (Special Terms and Conditions) to this Award; and If applicable, the Funding Opportunity Announcement, as amended.
INCONSISTENCY WITH FEDERAL LAW. If the Recipient believes that any term or condition of this Award is inconsistent with Federal statutes or regulations, the Recipient is required to send an immediate written notification to the DOE Award Administrator with a detailed description of the apparent inconsistency.
INCONSISTENCY WITH FEDERAL LAW. If the Recipient believes that any term or condition of this Award is inconsistent with Federal statutes or regulations, the Recipient is required to send an immediate written notification to the DOE Award Administrator with a detailed description of the apparent inconsistency. Term 7. ORDER OF PRECEDENCE Any apparent inconsistency between Federal statutes and regulations and the terms and conditions contained in this Award must be referred to the DOE Award Administrator for guidance. Inconsistencies shall be interpreted by giving precedence to the following documents, in the following order: • The National Policy Assurances applicable to this Award; • Attachment 4 (Intellectual Property Provisions) to this Award; • DOE Financial Assistance Regulations, 10 C.F.R. Part 600, as amended; • The Special Terms and Conditions to this Award; and • If applicable, the Funding Opportunity Announcement, as amended. Term 8. NONCOMPLIANCE Should the Recipient fail to comply with the requirements of this Award, EERE may take appropriate action consistent with 10 CFR §§ 600.24 and 600.25, including but not limited to, redirecting, suspending or terminating the Award. Further, EERE may deny reimbursement for costs incurred that relate to the failure to comply and such costs may not be recognized as allowable cost share.
INCONSISTENCY WITH FEDERAL LAW. Any apparent inconsistency between Federal statutes and regulations and the terms and conditions contained in this award must be referred to the CEO for guidance.
