Jurisdiction - Competent court Sample Clauses

Jurisdiction - Competent court. 14.2.1. All the disputes arising from this agreement or in relation to it shall be solved by means of arbitration by three arbitrators appointed and acting according to Milan Arbitration Chamber Regulation. 14.2.2. Regardless of what set above, the Seller can decide in any case to make the Italian Courts, namely Mantua Court, exclusively decide the issue.
Jurisdiction - Competent court. The operative law relating to this Agreement shall be that of the Netherlands and the Parties hereby submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the District Court of Amsterdam, the Netherlands. AS WITNESS the hands of the Parties hereto or their duly authorised representatives on the date set out above Signed by Mx. X.X. Xxxxxxxx Signed by Mx. Xxx Xxxx for and on behalf of NESBIC CONVERGING TECHNOLOGIES EUROPE (CTE) FUND B.V. Signed by Mx. X.X. Xxxxxxxx for and on behalf of Mr. P.R.M. van Binsbergen Signed by Mx. X.X. Xxxx for and on behalf of CX0XXX.XXX INC SCHEDULE I Vendors' holdings Vendor's Name Vendor's Address J.X. Xxxxxxxx ("Koekkoek") "Sonnehardt" Hertog Hxxxxxxxxxx 0 0000 XX Xxxxxxxxx Nesbic Converging Technologies Savannahwe8 17, Utrecht, Europe (CTE) Fund B.V. ("Nesbic") Attention: Fxxxx Xxxxxxxxx P.R.M. van Binsbergen ("Binsbergen") Eikenlaan 28, 5263 GN Vught Notices Addresses as meant Article 8.6: Vendor's Addresses as above copy of any correspondence to: Mx X. Xxxxxxx X.X. Xxx 00000, 0000 XX Xxxxxxxxx Purchaser's Address 30 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx xxxxxxxxx: Xxx Xxxx SW17 4TP Coay 10 copy of any correspondence to: Mx Xxxxxx Xxx Laren City Tower, Level four, 40 Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx XX 0X SDE Vendor's Name Vendor's shareholdings A B C Koekkoek: 28,801 484 Nesbic: 10,755 4,445 Binsbergen: 444 + Total 40,000 4,445 484 SCHEDULE 2 Details of Personal Care Card Nederland Holding BV Chamber of Commerce number: 32066578 Date of incorporation: 29-01-1996 Share capital: Authorised: NLG 200,000 Issued: 40,000 A Shares, 4,445 B Shares and 484 C Shares Registered office: Noordse Bosje 43, le etage 1211 BE Hilversum Directors: Mr W.A. Wxxxxxxx SCHEDULE 3

Related to Jurisdiction - Competent court

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA]. The competent court determined in accordance with the applicable national law shall have sole jurisdiction to hear any dispute between the institution and the participant concerning the interpretation, application or validity of this Agreement, if such dispute cannot be settled amicably.

  • Arbitrator's Jurisdiction The arbitrator shall take such evidence as in his judgment is appropriate for resolution of the dispute; however, he shall confine himself to the issues for arbitration and shall have no authority to determine any other issue not so submitted which is not directly essential to reaching a determination on the dispute at hand. The arbitrator shall have no power to recommend any right or relief for any period of time prior to the effective date of the Agreement under which the grievance was initiated. In those issues wherein the grievant’s relief sought involves back pay or lost wages covering a period of an Employee’s payroll separation due to suspension or discharge, the amount of the award shall be less any unemployment compensation or interim earnings, received by the aggrieved Employee. Second jobs or sources of income which the Employee received while under employment will not be considered interim income and will not be deducted when awarding lost wages or back pay. The decision of the arbitrator shall be submitted in writing to the parties within thirty (30) calendar days of the hearing’s conclusion unless the deadline is mutually extended by the parties. The decision and award of the arbitrator shall be final and binding on the Union, its members, the aggrieved Employee(s) and the CITY. With respect to grievances involving misapplication or misinterpretation of this Agreement, the grievance and arbitration procedure contained in this Article shall be the sole and exclusive remedy available to employees, and the parties hereto as this procedure is intended to supersede all conflicting provisions of the Ohio Revised Code regarding any and all matters subject to the grievance procedures of this Contract or otherwise made subject to this Agreement. With respect to grievances involving disciplinary suspensions, demotions or dismissals the election of remedies, as set forth above, shall be mutually exclusive. Choice of binding arbitration shall thereafter preclude appeal to Civil Service or to Court. Appeal to Civil Service shall preclude access to binding arbitration. With respect to cases of suspension, demotion and discharge, the arbitrator shall decide:

  • Jurisdiction; Venue In the event that any action is brought to enforce any provision of this Contract, the parties agree to exclusive jurisdiction in Thurston County Superior Court for the State of Washington and agree that in any such action venue shall lie exclusively at Olympia, Washington.

  • Courts If a Dispute is still unresolved following ten (10) Business Days after the Disputing Members attempted in good faith to resolve the Dispute in accordance with Section 11.02, then any of such Disputing Members may submit such Dispute to the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware or, in the event that such Court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter of such dispute, to another court of the State of Delaware or a U.S. federal court located in the State of Delaware (collectively, “Delaware Courts”). Each of the Members irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of, and agrees not to commence any action, suit, or proceeding relating to a Dispute except in, the Delaware Courts and hereby consents to service of process in any such Dispute by the delivery of such process to such party at the address and in the manner provided in Section 13.01. Each of the Members hereby irrevocably and unconditionally waives any objection to the laying of venue in any Dispute in the Delaware Courts and hereby further irrevocably and unconditionally waives and agrees not to plead or claim in any such court that any action, suit, or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum. EACH MEMBER IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any right it may have to a TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION, suit, OR PROCEEDING arising out of, relating to or otherwise WITH RESPECT TO THIS AGREEMENT or any transaction contemplated hereby.

  • Jurisdiction of Courts Québec hereby appoints the person from time to time who holds the position of Delegate General of Québec in New York, Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxx, 00xx xxxxx, Xxx Xxxx, Xxx Xxxx 00000-0000, as its authorized agent (the “Authorized Agent”) upon whom process may be served in any action by any Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement which may be instituted in any State or Federal court in The City of New York, and expressly accepts the non-exclusive jurisdiction of any such court in respect of such action. Québec hereby irrevocably waives any immunity to service of process in respect of any such action to which the Authorized Agent might otherwise be entitled. Such appointment shall be irrevocable as long as any of the Securities remain outstanding, except that, if for any reason the Authorized Agent ceases to be able to act as agent or no longer has an address in The City of New York, Québec will appoint another person or persons in The City of New York, selected in its discretion, as Authorized Agent(s). Québec will take any and all action, including the filing of any and all documents and instruments that may be necessary to continue such appointment or appointments in full force and effect as aforesaid. Service of process upon the Authorized Agent together with written notice of such service mailed or delivered to Québec at its address set forth in Section 11, shall be deemed in every respect effective service of process upon Québec. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any action by an Underwriter, or by any person controlling such Underwriter, and based upon this Agreement may be instituted in any competent court in Québec. Québec hereby waives, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, any immunity to jurisdiction to which it might otherwise be entitled in any action based on this Agreement which may be instituted as provided in this Section in any State or Federal court in The City of New York or in any competent court in Québec.

  • Jurisdiction All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Warrant shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of the Purchase Agreement.

  • Jurisdiction of English courts The courts of England have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement (including a dispute relating to the existence, validity or termination of this Agreement) or any non-contractual obligation arising out of or in connection with this Agreement (a Dispute).

  • APPLICABLE LAW AND COMPETENT COURT 15.1 The Agreement is governed by law of the Czech Republic. 15.2 The competent court determined in accordance with the applicable national law shall have sole jurisdiction to hear any dispute between the organisation and the participant concerning the interpretation, application or validity of this Agreement, if such dispute cannot be settled amicably.

  • Court ordered services and supplies including court-ordered care or testing, or services required as a condition of parole, probation, release or because of any legal proceeding.

  • Court of Jurisdiction Both DBS and the Member agree that the Tokyo District Court will be the exclusive court of jurisdiction in the first instance in any dispute and/ or legal action relating to the rights and obligations under this Agreement or an Individual Contract.