Keywords. 4.5.1.5. Price expiry date (to be in line with Review Dates)
Keywords. Submitters should include keywords as taken from the ESTSC thesaurus listing (Appendix F of ESTSC--1). Keywords chosen that are not on the list will be subject to ESTSC approval before being added to the thesaurus. Subsequent revision lists will be available. ESTSC may also add additional keywords to aid in the indexing of the materials.
Keywords. Key agreement, quantum cryptography, quantum privacy amplification, purification, entanglement, intrinsic mutual information, secret-key rate, information theory.
Keywords. Any Keyword Search Terms to be directed to the ICP Sites shall be (i) subject to availability for use by ICP and (ii) limited to the combination of the Keyword(Trade Xxxx) search modifier combined with a registered trademark of ICP. AOL reserves the right to revoke at any time ICP's use of any Keyword Search Terms which do not incorporate registered trademarks of ICP. ICP acknowledges that its utilization of a Keyword Search Term will not create in it nor will it represent it has, any right, title or interest in or to such Keyword Search Term, other than the right, title and interest Partner holds in ICP's registered trademark independent of the Keyword Search Term. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, ICP will not (a) attempt to register or otherwise obtain trademark or copyright protection in the Keyword Search Term, or (b) use the Keyword Search Term except for the purposes expressly required or permitted under this Agreement. This Section shall survive the completion, expiration, termination or cancellation of this Agreement.
Keywords. Adding good keywords is another way to increase the chances that your work will be discovered. For example, geographic locations or specialized terms that do not occur in your title or abstract can increase exposure of your work.
Keywords. Where a customer requests to stop the service, a notification will be sent to your dashboard asking for their number to be removed, but the responsibility to ensure no more messages are sent to the client remains with you.
Keywords. Author Manuscript Interrater reliability; pediatric; red flag finding; kappa; emergency medicine; emergency department Headaches are a common chief complaint in children presenting to emergency departments (EDs) in the US, comprising approximately 1% of visits annually.(1–3) Most of these headaches are primary (eg, migraines) or due to conditions such as respiratory infections.(2– 4) However, a small but meaningful proportion (0.5–1%) of headaches are secondary to undiagnosed emergent intracranial abnormalities such as brain tumors, intracranial hemorrhages, or strokes.(2,5–8) Author Manuscript ED clinicians use findings obtained on patient history or physical examination to gauge whether a child with a headache is at high or low risk of having an emergent intracranial abnormality, and to decide whether to obtain emergent neuroimaging.(5,9–14) However, in order for specific clinical findings to guide neuroimaging decision-making appropriately, clinicians must agree on their presence or absence. There are few studies examining interobserver agreement of patient history and physical/neurological examination findings in children with headaches. Clinician agreement is particularly important for children, as patient history and physical examination findings may be more difficult to elicit compared with adults due to differences in developmental capacity, language, and cooperation with the physical examination.(15,16) Findings with adequate agreement can be used across different types of clinicians to guide neuroimaging decision-making and to be considered for incorporation into clinical prediction rules or risk stratification models for identification of children with headaches who are at risk of emergent intracranial abnormalities. These rules or models can help optimize the use of ED neuroimaging, including safely reducing unnecessary sedation and/or exposure to radiation from computed tomography (CT), which is the imaging modality of choice in the ED. Therefore, our objective was to determine the interobserver agreement of patient history and physical examination findings in otherwise healthy children undergoing ED evaluations for headaches.
Keywords. Certain words in this agreement have specific meanings which are explained in clause 21 (Meaning of Words).
Keywords. RCEP; Trade and welfare; Carbon mitigation; Input-output analysis; Sectoral linkage Introduction Regional trade agreements (RTAs) have been sweeping the world and have become ubiquitous in efforts to facilitate international trade and investment1-3. After an 8-year- long negotiation, the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) finally concluded in November 2020 and became the largest RTA in the world in terms of both economic size and population. According to the Schedule of Tariff Commitments in the RCEP Agreement, over 90% of the trade in goods will eventually have zero tariffs, and most of them will be duty-free immediately or within ten years after the agreement enters into force. Tariff elimination in the region will reduce trade and production costs, resulting in considerable trade-creation and production-boosting effects. However, increased international production fragmentation has raised concerns about the trade-climate dilemma (or pollution haven effect) of international trade4-10. That is, international trade increases global or regional emissions if developed economies with cleaner production technology and more stringent environmental policies transfer their polluting industries or production activities to developing countries, leading to emission leakage. Most of the RCEP member countries are typical developing economies that are less emission efficient in their manufacturing industries. In 2018, the amount of CO2 emitted by RCEP member countries accounted for a high share (39.13%11) of global CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Therefore, the rapid growth of production activities and trade in an increasing number of less developed nations could impose non-negligible burdens on global and national emission mitigation. Previous work deals with the economic effects of RTAs, and the other deals with the environmental side effects of international trade. The first strand of the literature focuses on quantifying the economic welfare effects of RTAs12-17 and has largely neglected environmental problems. Conversely, the second strand has substantially accounted ex post for the large carbon flows between countries via international trade18-27. In fact, few studies have ex ante quantified the environmental effects of a trade agreement. In this study, we aim to estimate such burdens after evaluating the economic effects of RCEP tariff reductions. The quantification of both RCEP economic gains and environmental burdens has important policy im...
Keywords. Optimal security · Standard model · Ideal model · Impos- sibility · Tweakable blockciphers 1 Introduction A blockcipher E : K × M → M is a family of permutations on M indexed by a key k ∈ K. Tweakable blockciphers generalize over the classical ones by the additional input of a tweak. More detailed, a tweakable blockcipher E˜ : ˜∈T · M K× T × M → M ∈ K satisfies the property that for every key k and tweak t , E(k, t, ) is a permutation on . The key is usually secret, but the tweak is a parameter that is known or even chosen by the user. In 2002, Xxxxxx, Rivest, and Xxxxxx [36] formalized the principle of tweakable blockciphers, and they have gained broad attention since then.
