Level 2 Basic Tree Risk Assessment Sample Clauses

Level 2 Basic Tree Risk Assessment. Separate from the Examination of Trees, a Level 2 Basic Tree Risk Assessment can be performed. This will be done using the International Society of Arboriculture’s (ISA) Best Management Practices. This is a service above our Standard Examination of Trees. It provides a verbal consultation and written assessment of the combined likelihood of a tree or tree part failure, the likelihood that that part will impact a target, and the consequences of impact on a particular target or targets. CTL will visually evaluate the overall tree, tree architecture, tree health, site conditions, root conditions, and trunk and branch defects to determine the best course of action. This service will be performed by an ISA Certified Arborist who is Tree Risk Assessment Qualified. This is a consultation only and is separate from other contracted work. Other methods of assessment may be recommended or required at an additional cost. The Client shall assume “Duty of Care” as a result of any assessments. Due to the dynamic nature of trees and acts of God, not all defects can be seen, or events predicted. The Client may be charged a fee for this assessment as determined by CTL.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Level 2 Basic Tree Risk Assessment

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Periodic Risk Assessment Provider further acknowledges and agrees to conduct periodic risk assessments and remediate any identified security and privacy vulnerabilities in a timely manner.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Criteria for Performance Assessment A. A teacher’s performance shall be assessed based on the criteria set forth in the evaluation instrument, Appendix D.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of –

  • Risk Assessments a. Risk Assessment - Transfer Agent shall, at least annually, perform risk assessments that are designed to identify material threats (both internal and external) against Fund Data, the likelihood of those threats occurring and the impact of those threats upon the Transfer Agent organization to evaluate and analyze the appropriate level of information security safeguards (“Risk Assessments”).

  • Substance Abuse Testing The Parties agree that it is in the best interest of all concerned to promote a safe working environment. The Union has no objection to pre-employment substance abuse testing when required by the Employer and further, the Union has no objection to voluntary substance abuse testing to qualify for employment on projects when required by a project owner. The cost and scheduling of such testing shall be paid for and arranged by the Employer. The Union agrees to reimburse the Employer for any failed pre-access Alcohol and Drug test costs.

  • Conformity Assessment 1. The Parties recognize that a broad range of mechanisms exists to facilitate the acceptance of conformity assessment procedures and results thereby, including:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.