Methods of Assessment. The decision as to whether assessment will be carried out by means of tests, equivalent calculations or controls will depend upon the availability of verified data concerning the dimensions, structure, construc- tion and layout of the product, its type and its size. This will be determined by the IMCI in consultation with the Manufacturer. The number of products representing the production of the Manufacturer on which one or more tests, equivalent calculations or controls are undertaken will depend on the form of production, the intended production numbers and the production materials. This will be determined by the IMCI in consultation with the Manufacturer. It is likely that the IMCI will require verification of supplied data and it will appoint the above mentioned Inspector or Laboratory under whose responsibility such shall be verified. The cost of verification will be borne by the Manufacturer in accordance with the level of IMCI fees. Where physical tests are undertaken, these will be carried out by a Laboratory in its facilities or under the supervision of, but not by, an Inspector. The Laboratory has to be appointed specifically for the task by the IMCI. The cost of the supervision will be borne by the Manufacturer in accordance with the level of IMCI fees. All tests will be undertaken at a venue and at times mutually agreed between the Manufacturer and the IMCI. The Manufacturer may cancel the testing at any time up and until 24 hours prior to the pro- grammed time without incurring any cancellation fee. A decision as to whether or not to proceed will be taken jointly by the Manufacturer and the IMCI based on weather forecasts 24 hours prior to the pro- grammed testing, if applicable. Subsequent to a decision to proceed if, for weather reasons or by cancella- tion by the Manufacturer, the testing/test does not go ahead, then the Manufacturer will be charged all costs occurred to that point, if any.
Methods of Assessment. TCPCS intends to meet the goal of producing students who have the academic and personal habits and attitudes desired of an educated citizen in the 21st century. Standards and standardization are the basis of assessment. Learners are shown exemplary performances for given tasks. An assessment of their efforts reflects how closely it matches this performance. The goal is not only to give a grade, but also to encourage students to do their personal best and show them their own improvement throughout the year. Self-assessment is also used. As active participants in assessment of their own work, learners are encouraged to develop intra-personal understanding of their strengths and deficiencies and an objective view of their accomplishments. In addition, a score on a piece of work can be improved if the learner is willing to accept the challenge for improvement put forth by the assessment. Performance will be assessed on at least the following levels:
Methods of Assessment. The School shall evaluate students’ work based on, at a minimum, the assessment strategies identified in this Contract and its annual report.
Methods of Assessment. The School shall evaluate student’s work based on the assessment strategies identified in this Contract and in its annual report. The School and the Authorizer agree that the School’s operation under the Charter Contract shall be measured by the school performance indicators set forth in this Contract, including academic outcomes, standards for governance, financial management, and school operation as set forth in state and federal law and Addendum B (“School Accountability and Authorizer Oversight System”).
Methods of Assessment. 1. The evaluator may utilize, but is not limited to, the following methods of assessing performance:
Methods of Assessment. The School shall evaluate students’ work based on the assessment strategies identified in this Contract and in its annual report. The School and the Authorizer agree that the School’s operation under the Charter Contract shall be measured by the school performance indicators set forth in this Contract, including academic outcomes, standards for governance, financial management, and school operation as set forth in state and federal law and Addendum B (“School Accountability and Authorizer Oversight System”). Regular Assessments. Volunteers of America will monitor student academic achievement by reviewing student testing and assessments. Government Required Assessments. School students will take the Minnesota Comprehensive Assessment tests and any other testing required by Applicable Law. The School will comply with the requirements of the Minnesota Graduation Standards, as defined by Minnesota Statutes §§ 120B.02 and 120B.024; and Minnesota Rules parts 3501.0010–.0280.
Methods of Assessment. Please list the method and explain how it will be used via online format: 1 4 6 7
Methods of Assessment. Methods of Assessment may include, but are not limited to, the following (check all that apply) 1 4 5 6 7
Methods of Assessment. The same method of assessment and the same technique should be used to characterize each identified and reported lesion at baseline and during follow-up. All measurements should be taken and recorded in metric notation using a ruler. All baseline evaluations should be performed as closely as possible to the beginning of treatment and never more than 28 days before the beginning of treatment. Clinical lesions: Superficial clinical lesions measured by caliper or ruler will not be used to assess tumor response in this study. Conventional CT and MRI: CT slice thickness should be ≤ 5 mm. MRI is also acceptable in certain situations (e.g., for body scans), but NOT lung. Use of MRI remains a complex issue. MRI has excellent contrast, special and temporal resolution; however, there are many image acquisition variables involved in MRI, which greatly impact image quality, lesions conspicuity, and measurement. Furthermore, the availability of MRI is variable globally. As with CT, if an MRI is performed, the technical specifications of the scanning sequences used should be optimized for the evaluation of the type and site of disease. Furthermore, as with CT, the modality used at follow-up should be the same as was used at baseline and the lesions should be measured/assessed on the same pulse sequence parameters for all scanners, body parts, and diseases. Ideally, subsequent image acquisitions should use the same type of scanner and follow the baseline imaging protocol as closely as possible. If possible, body scans should be performed with breath-hold scanning techniques. PET-CT: PET-CT is an acceptable means of imaging if the CT is of diagnostic quality and meets with the requirements in the Imaging Manual. FDG-PET: FDG-PET will not be used to assess tumor response in this study. Ultrasound: Ultrasound will not be used to assess tumor response in this study. Endoscopy, Laparoscopy: Endoscopy, Laparoscopy will not be used to assess tumor response in this study. Cytology, Histology: In rare cases, these techniques can be used to differentiate between PR and CR. It is mandatory to obtain cytological confirmation of the neoplastic origin of any effusion that appears or worsens during treatment when measurable disease has met criteria for response or stable disease. This confirmation is necessary to differentiate response or stable disease versus progressive disease, as an effusion may be a side effect of the treatment.
Methods of Assessment. The decision as to whether assessment will be carried out by means of tests, equivalent calculations or controls will depend upon the availability of verified data concerning the dimensions, structure, construction and layout of the product, its type and its size. This will be determined by the IMCI in consultation with the Manufac- turer. It is likely that the IMCI will require verification of supplied data and it will appoint the above mentioned In- xxxxxxx or Laboratory under whose responsibility such shall be verified. The cost of verification will be borne by the Manufacturer in accordance with the level of IMCI fees. At least one (1) physical inspection of a specimen of the product is required. Where physical tests are undertaken, these will be carried out by a Laboratory in its facilities or under the su- pervision of, but not by, an Inspector. The Laboratory has to be appointed specifically for the task by the IMCI (see 25). The cost of the supervision will be borne by the Manufacturer in accordance with the level of IMCI fees. All tests will be undertaken at a venue and at times mutually agreed between the Manufacturer and the IMCI. The Manufacturer may cancel the testing at any time up and until 24 hours prior to the programmed time without incurring any cancellation fee. A decision as to whether or not to proceed will be taken jointly by the Manufacturer and the IMCI based on weather forecasts 24 hours prior to the programmed testing, if appli- cable. Subsequent to a decision to proceed if, for weather reasons or by cancellation by the Manufacturer, the testing/test does not go ahead, then the Manufacturer will be charged all costs occurred to that point, if any.
