LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION Clause Samples

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. 5.1.1 The Company is not engaged, whether as plaintiff or defendant, in any litigation, arbitration proceedings or prosecution and no such litigation, proceeding or prosecution is pending or threatened. 5.1.2 There is no order, decree or judgment of any court or governmental agency or Public Authority in Malaysia or any foreign country against the Company which may have a material adverse effect upon the assets or business of the Company. 5.1.3 There is not and has not been, in respect of the Company or any part of its business or assets: (i) any order made, petition presented or resolution passed (and no meeting has been convened at which such a resolution is proposed) for its winding up; (ii) any voluntary arrangement or administrative order; (iii) any proposal or petition or any distress, execution or other process levied; (iv) any receiver, administrative receiver, administrator or other encumbrance appointed; (v) any unfulfilled or unsatisfied judgment or court order outstanding; or (vi) any circumstances which might lead to the occurrence of any of the above events. 5.1.4 There is no current, on-going, pending or threatened litigation by or against the Vendor which may adversely affect the ability of the Vendor to fulfil and discharge all or any of its obligations under this Agreement. 5.1.5 There is no order, decree or judgment of any court or governmental agency or Public Authority in British Virgin Islands or any foreign country against the Vendor which may adversely affect the ability of the Vendor to fulfil and discharge all or any of its obligations under this Agreement.

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. If a dispute is not resolved through negotiations or mediation, each party may require the dispute to be resolved with final effect before the Norwegian courts of law.

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to enforce the terms of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees.

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. If a Dispute is not resolved pursuant to mediation within 60 days after the initiation of the mediation, either Executive or Employer may elect to settle the Dispute by initiating litigation on ten days’ advance written notice to the other party or by submitting the Dispute to binding arbitration in accordance with the Rules for Non-Administered Arbitration of the CPR Institute for Dispute Resolution.

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. 3.1.1 The Company is not, as at the date of this Agreement, engaged in any litigation, arbitration proceedings or prosecution. 3.1.2 As at the date of this Agreement there is no order, decree or judgment of any court or governmental agency or Public Authority in Hong Kong or any foreign country against the Company.

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. If legal action is instituted to enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Lease or if legal action is instituted in a Bankruptcy Court for a United States District Court to enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Lease, to seek relief from an automatic stay, to obtain adequate protection, or to otherwise assert the interest of Landlord in a bankruptcy proceeding, the party not prevailing shall pay the prevailing party's costs and disbursements, the fees and expenses of expert witnesses in determining reasonable attorney fees, and such sums as the court may determine to be reasonable for the prevailing party's attorney fees connected with the trial and any appeal and by petition for review thereof.

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. If legal action is instituted to enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Lease or if legal action is instituted in a Bankruptcy Court for a United States District Court to enforce or interpret any of the terms of this Lease, to seek relief from an automatic stay, to obtain adequate protection, or to otherwise assert the interest of Landlord or Tenant in a bankruptcy proceeding, the party not prevailing shall pay the prevailing party's costs and disbursements, the fees and expenses of expert witnesses in determining reasonable attorney fees, and such sums as the court may determine to be reasonable for the prevailing party's attorney fees connected with the trial and any appeal and by petition for review thereof. This subsection shall not apply to the mediation provisions of this Lease.

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION no matter the target company is the plaintiff, defendant or c-defendant (claimant or respondent) or the third person, Party A has been fully informed so long as the relevant cases have been filed but not legally or effectively closed;

LITIGATION OR ARBITRATION. In the event that suit or arbitration is brought to enforce the terms of this contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to litigation costs and reasonable attorneys' fees. Classification and Compensation Study Last Best and Final Offer Submitted By: Chief Executive Officer ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇@▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇ Tel: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇ Fax: ▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇ May 31, 2015 Ms. ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Human Resources Analyst City of Menlo Park ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ Dear ▇▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇: Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your request for proposals for a Classification and Compensation Study for the City of Menlo Park. We are most interested in assisting the City with this important project and feel that we are uniquely qualified to provide value to your organization based on our experience working with other cities and public agencies throughout California. ▇▇▇▇ & Associates is an experienced Human Resources consulting firm that has been providing classification and compensation consulting services to cities, counties, special districts, courts, educational institutions, and other public agencies for over thirty years. Founded in 1984, the firm is a woman-owned California small business corporation and has achieved a reputation for working successfully with management, employees, and union representatives. We believe in a high level of dialogue and input from study stakeholders and our proposal speaks to that level of effort. That extra effort has resulted in close to 100% implementation of all of our classification and compensation studies. We have developed K&A’s collaborative, transparent, and inclusive methodology over the course of thirty years to ensure optimal outcomes and success rates with all of our projects, particularly when various different stakeholders with potentially divergent or conflicting priorities are involved. Our consensus-driven approach has always avoided formal appeals at the end of our studies, ensuring that clients are not left with a divided organization and negatively impacted employee morale. Our number one priority is to meet Menlo Park’s needs and requirements. Having conducted hundreds of classification and compensation studies over the course of our thirty years in business, our firm has developed project management skills that control costs, ensure on-time delivery of end products, close management of project staff, and effective crisis management if unexpected issues and...