Meta-Analysis Sample Clauses

Meta-Analysis. Parental care Twenty-five studies were identified that measured perceived parental care (Xxxxxxx, 2011; Xxxxx et al., 2003; Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx, & Xxxxxxx, 2000; Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 1990; Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx, Lerer, Xxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2008; Xxxxx et al., 2012; Xx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx, Xxxx, & Xxxxxxx, 2003; Xxxx, Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, Yellowlees, & Xxxxxxxx, 2011; Xx Xxxxxxx et al., 1998; Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx, & Xxxx, 2010; Xxxxxxxx et al., 2011; Xxxxx, 1984; Xxxxxxx & Laporte, 2002; Xxxx & Xxxxxxx, 1992; Laporte & Xxxxxxx, 2007; Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2000; Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxxxx, 1988; Xxxxxx & Kroger, 1992; Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx-Xxxxxxxx, Xxx, & Xxxxxxx, 1992; Xxxxxxx, Xxx xxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxxxx, 1989; Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx et al., 2005; Xxxxxxx et al., 2010; Xxxxxxxxxxxx & Perris, 1994; Xxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 2007; Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2000). Each study measured parental care using the Parental Bonding Instrument (PBI). The studies were included in the meta-analysis shown in the forest plot in Figure 2. People with ED reported lower levels of perceived parental care with a moderate ES 0.53 (95%CI: 0.41, 0.65, p < .001) relative to HC. This overall effect remained moderate .51 (p < .001) after adjusting using the meta-regression and there was no evidence of publication bias (Begg’s test p=.080; Xxxxx’x test p=.413).
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Meta-Analysis. Parental overprotection The same twenty-six studies as in the prior analysis were included in the meta-analysis of perceived parental overprotection shown in Figure 3 (Amianto, 2011; Bonne et al., 2003; Bulik et al., 2000; Calam et al., 1990; Xxxxxxx et al., 2008; Cardi et al., 2012; De Panfilis et al., 2003; Xxxx et al., 2011; Di Pentima et al., 1998; Xxxxxxx et al., 2010; Xxxxxxxx et al., 2011; Xxxxx, 1984; Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 0000; Kent & Xxxxxxx, 1992; Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx, 2007; Xxxxx et al., 2000; Xxxxxx et al., 1988; Xxxxxx & Kroger, 1992; Xxxxxxx et al., 1992; Xxxxxxx et al., 1989; Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx et al., 2005; Xxxxxxx et al., 2010; Vandereycken & Perris, 1994; Xxxx et al., 2007; Yamaguchi et al., 2000). People with ED reported higher levels of overprotection with a small ES 0.33 (95%CI: 0.21, 0.45, p < .001) relative to HC. This overall effect remained small .29 (p = .022) following adjustments made to the overall effect by the meta-regression. We found evidence of publication bias (Begg’s test p=.025; Xxxxx’x test p=.036). The trim and fill method estimated that twenty studies were missing from the analysis. The adjusted ES remained small .14 (95%CI: 0.01, 0.27, p = .033) after correcting for publication bias using this method.
Sample 1
Meta-Analysis. Alexithymia Twenty-nine studies were identified in the area of alexithymia (Adenzato, Todisco, & Xxxxxx, 2012; Beadle, Paradiso, Xxxxxxx, & XxXxxxxxx, 2013; Bourke, Taylor, Parker, & Xxxxx, 1992; Cochrane, Brewerton, Wilson, & Xxxxxx, 1993; de Groot, Rodin, & Olmsted, 1995; De Panfilis et al., 2003; de Zwaan et al., 1995; de Zwaan, Biener, Bach, Wiesnagrotzki, & Xxxxxxx, 1996; Xxxxxxx et al., 2008; Xxxxxxxxxx, xx Xxxxxxx, Xxxx, Xxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxx, 0000; Jimerson, Wolfe, Franko, Covino, & Sifneos, 1994; Xxxxxxx et al., 2006; Xxxxxxx et al., 2013; Kuhnpast, Xxxxxxx, & Xxxxxxxx, 2012; Miyake, Onoda, Shirao, Okamoto, & Yamawaki, 2012; Nandrino et al., 2012; Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx, Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx, & Pezard, 2006; Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, & Xxxxxxx, 0000; Pinaquy, Chabrol, Simon, Louvet, & Barbe, 2003; Pollatos et al., 2008; Schmidt, Jiwany, & Treasure, 1993; Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxx, Mainz, Fink, Xxxxxxxx- Xxxxxxxx, & Konrad, 2012; Xxxxxxxx et al., 2005; Xxxxxx, Parker, Bagby, & Bourke, 1996; Tchanturia, Davies, Harrison, et al., 2012; Xxxxxx et al., 2011; Troop, Schmidt, & Treasure, 1995; Zeeck, Stelzer, Linster, Joos, & Xxxxxxxx, 2011; Zonnevijlle-Bendek et al., 2002; Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx et al., 2004). The studies are presented in the forest plot in Figure 7. People with ED have high levels of alexithymia with a large ES 1.31 (95%CI: 1.15, 1.46, p < .001). This effect became nonsignificant after adjusting using the meta-regression .66 (p = .50). Publication bias was found (Begg’s test p=.002; Xxxxx’x test p<.001) and fourteen studies were estimated by the trim and fill method to be missing from the analysis. The adjusted ES remained large .99 (95%CI: 0.82, 1.15, p < .001) after correcting for publication bias. Study Measure Outcome Self-Knowledge: Alexithymia SMD (95% CI) % Weight AN Adenzato et al. 2012 Xxxxxx et al. 2013 Bourke et al. 1992 Cochrane et al. 1993a de Zwaan et al. 1996a Eizaguirre et al. 2003a Xxxxxxx et al. 2006a Miyake et al. 2012 Nandrino et al. 2006 Nandrino et al. 2012 Parling et al. 2010 Pollatos et al. 2008 Xxxxxxx et al. 1993 Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxx et al. 2012 Soussignan et al. 2011 Xxxxxxxx et al. 2005a Xxxxxx et al. 1996 Tchanturia et al. 2012a Xxxxxx et al. 2011 Troop et al. 1995a Zonnevijlle-Bendek et al. 2002 Xxxxxxxxxx-Xxxxxx et al. 2004b Subtotal TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS TAS Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithymia Alexithy...
Sample 1
Meta-Analysis. Insights gained from meta-analysis can be useful to resolve several issues faced in combining surveys, as survey heterogeneity, planning data collection, and pooling data across surveys (Xxxxxx 1999). Xxxxx and Xxxxxxxxx (1990) define meta-analysis as “the practice of using statistical methods to combine the outcomes of a series of different experiments or investigations”. It implies four steps: identifying all relevant studies; assessing study quality; dealing with study heterogeneity; and summarizing the results. Xxxx (1998b), in the context of constructing an average birth rate for a continent using separate country birth rates, proposes three options for pooling multinational samples that are directly comparable to the three main meta-analytic models for combining study effect sizes: fixed effects (equal weight to each country’s estimate); equal effects (all subjects are independent and of equal importance); and random effects (weighed averages of the study proportions). Combining separate sites When similar data are collected in several sites (cities, provinces or districts of one country) of a combined population, but not in all of the sites, alternative treatments of them are possible (Xxxx 1999a). In combining separate sites three decisions must be made: the allocation of sample sizes, whether the samples should be combined and what weighting to use. These are expressed as follows by Xxxx.
Sample 1
Meta-Analysis. Insecure attachment Eight studies were identified for the area of insecure attachment. Each study measured classic insecure attachment via-self report (Amianto, Xxxxxx-Xxxx, Morando, Sobrero, & Xxxxxxx, 2011; Chassler, 1997; Holliday, Uher, Landau, Collier, & Treasure, 2006; Illing, Tasca, Balfour, & Xxxxxxx, 2010; Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, & Xxx, 0000; Miljkovitch, Pierrehumbert, Karmaniola, Bader, & Xxxxxx, 2005; Tereno, Soares, Martins, Celani, & Sarnpaio, 2008; Troisi, Massaroni, & Cuzzolaro, 2005). Figure 1 presents the forest plot for the meta-analysis of insecure attachment. Relative to HC, people with ED report insecure attachment with a large ES 0.91 (95%CI: 0.76, 0.07, p < .001). This overall effect remains large even after adjusting with the meta-regression 1.13 (p < .001). There was no evidence of publication bias (Begg’s test p=.537; Xxxxx’x test p=.761). Affiliation and Attachment: Insecure Attachment Affiliation and Attachment 3. Systematic Review of Social Processes in Eating Disorders 74 % Study Measure Outcome Affiliation and Attachment : Insecure attachment SMD (95% CI) Weight AN Xxxxxx et al. 2002a AAS InsecureStyle
Sample 1
Meta-Analysis. Agency The definition of agency according to the RDoC project is "the ability to recognize one’s self as the agent of one’s actions and thoughts, including the recognition of one’s own body/body parts"(as defined in the NIMH workshop: xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxx.xxx/research-priorities/rdoc/rdoc-social- processes.pdf). The sense of agency refers to the ability to recognize oneself as the agent of a behaviour and, as a result, to the proprioceptive awareness that one's body corresponds to the agent itself (Jeannerod, 2003). Animacy on the other hand is the ability to perceive that another entity is an agent showing contingent behaviours. Five studies measured the sense of agency using experimental tasks (Xxxxxxx et al., 2001; Eshkevari et al., 2012; Guardia, Cottencin, Thomas, Dodin, & Luyat, 2012; Keizer, Smeets, Dijkerman, van Elburg, & Xxxxxx, 2012; Papezova, Yamamotova, & Xxxx, 2005). The studies were included in the forest plot shown in Figure 5. People with ED have a lower sense of agency with a moderate ES 0.50 (95%CI: 0.36, 0.65, p < .001). The overall small effect becomes nonsignificant .39 (p=.264) after using the meta-regression. There was no evidence of publication bias (Begg’s test p=.189; Xxxxx’x test p=.109).
Sample 1
Meta-Analysis. Understanding mental states Twelve studies measured ‘Understanding Mental States’ through experimental tasks (Adenzato et al., 2012; Gillberg et al., 2010; Xxxxxxx & Treasure, 2013; Xxxxxxx et al., 2013; Harrison, Tchanturia, et al., 2010; Xxxxxxxx et al., 2009; Xxxxxx et al., 2012; Xxxxxx-Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx-Moya, Grau, & Obiols, 2012; Xxxxxxxxx et al., 2010; Renwick, Dejong, et al., 2013; Russell, Schmidt, Doherty, Young, & Tchanturia, 2009; Tchanturia et al., 2004). The studies were included in the forest plot shown in Figure 8. Individuals with ED showed poorer perception of the mental states of others relative to HC. The overall ES was moderate at .44 (95%CI: 0.27, 0.62, p < .001) and this became larger 1.07 (p = .001) after adjusting using the meta-regression. Publication bias was found (Begg’s test p=.002; Xxxxx’x test p=.001. The trim and fill method estimated that four studies were missing from the analysis. The adjusted ES remained small .32 (95%CI: 0.13, 0.50, p = .001) after correcting for this bias.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Meta-Analysis. Social dominance Eight studies were included in the meta-analysis of social dominance (Cardi et al., 2014; Carter, Kelly, & Xxxxxxx, 2012; Xxxxx & Xxxxx, 2012; Hartmann, Zeeck, & Xxxxxxx, 2010; Masheb, Grilo, & Xxxxxxxx, 0000; Swan & Xxxxxxx, 2003; Troop et al., 1995; Waller, Ohanian, Xxxxx, & Xxxxx, 2000). These studies measured social dominance through self-report questionnaires. They are presented in the forest plot shown in Figure 9. People with ED reported a greater sense of social inferiority than controls with a large ES at 1.22 (95%CI: 0.87, 1.56, p < .001) and this overall effect remained large 1.08 (p = .006) after adjusting using the meta-regression. There was no evidence of publication bias (Begg’s test p=.381; Xxxxx’x test p=.089).
Sample 1

Related to Meta-Analysis

  • Data Analysis In the meeting, the analysis that has led the College President to conclude that a reduction- in-force in the FSA at that College may be necessary will be shared. The analysis will include but is not limited to the following: ● Relationship of the FSA to the mission, vision, values, and strategic plan of the College and district ● External requirement for the services provided by the FSA such as accreditation or intergovernmental agreements ● Annual instructional load (as applicable) ● Percentage of annual instructional load taught by Residential Faculty (as applicable) ● Fall Full-Time Student Equivalent (FFTE) inclusive of dual enrollment ● Number of Residential Faculty teaching/working in the FSA ● Number of Residential Faculty whose primary FSA is the FSA being analyzed ● Revenue trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to tuition and fees ● Expenditure trends over five years for the FSA including but not limited to personnel and capital ● Account balances for any fees accounts within the FSA ● Cost/benefit analysis of reducing all non-Residential Faculty plus one Residential Faculty within the FSA ● An explanation of the problem that reducing the number of faculty in the FSA would solve ● The list of potential Residential Faculty that are at risk of layoff as determined by the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources ● Other relevant information, as requested

  • Statistical Analysis 31 F-tests and t-tests will be used to analyze OV and Quality Acceptance data. The F-test is a 32 comparison of variances to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance population variances 33 are equal. The t-test is a comparison of means to determine if the OV and Quality Acceptance 34 population means are equal. In addition to these two types of analyses, independent verification 35 and observation verification will also be used to validate the Quality Acceptance test results.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • COMPENSATION ANALYSIS After the expiration of the second (2nd) Renewal Term of this Agreement, if any, a Compensation Analysis may be performed. At such time, based on the reported Total Gross Revenue, performance of the Concession, and/or Department’s existing rates for similarly- performing operations, Department may choose to increase the Concession Payment for the following Renewal Term(s), if any.

  • Drug Test Results 1. All records pertaining to department-required drug tests shall remain confidential, and shall not be provided to other employers or agencies without the written permission of the person whose records are sought. However, medical, administrative, and immediate supervisory personnel may have access to relevant portions of the records as necessary to insure the acceptable performance of the officer's job duties.

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • Industrial Operations Analyst (IOA ‌ The IOA is a GSA Government official who audits Contractor records and conducts Contractor Assistance Visits (CAVs) to the Contractor’s place of business to assist the Contractor with task order reporting, Contract Access Fee (CAF) management, and other general contract administration functions deemed necessary by the Government.

  • Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange The Parties will cooperate with one another and the NYISO in the analysis of disturbances to either the Large Generating Facility or the New York State Transmission System by gathering and providing access to any information relating to any disturbance, including information from disturbance recording equipment, protective relay targets, breaker operations and sequence of events records, and any disturbance information required by Good Utility Practice.

  • SERVICE MONITORING, ANALYSES AND ORACLE SOFTWARE 11.1 We continuously monitor the Services to facilitate Oracle’s operation of the Services; to help resolve Your service requests; to detect and address threats to the functionality, security, integrity, and availability of the Services as well as any content, data, or applications in the Services; and to detect and address illegal acts or violations of the Acceptable Use Policy. Oracle monitoring tools do not collect or store any of Your Content residing in the Services, except as needed for such purposes. Oracle does not monitor, and does not address issues with, non-Oracle software provided by You or any of Your Users that is stored in, or run on or through, the Services. Information collected by Oracle monitoring tools (excluding Your Content) may also be used to assist in managing Oracle’s product and service portfolio, to help Oracle address deficiencies in its product and service offerings, and for license management purposes.

  • Statistical Sampling Documentation a. A copy of the printout of the random numbers generated by the “Random Numbers” function of the statistical sampling software used by the IRO.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.