Niagara Mohawk Power Corp Sample Clauses

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. Funding No.#,Work Order No.#Company No: Funding No.#,Work Order No.#Company No: Funding No.#,Work Order No.#Company No: Prepared By: Xxxxxx Xxxxx Version: 1.0 Date: 06/24/11 Requested Date: 08/05/11 Requested by: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx Request Documentation: EDIS e-mail Substation Engineering Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx 8/22/11 Manager Approval Xxx Xxxxxxxxxxx Date Protection Engineering Xxxx Stqnbro 8/15/11 Manager Approval Xxxx Xxxxxxx Date Summary Alternative # Cost (-25% to +50%) Project Duration Recommended Alternative #2 $1031K 60wks #1 $992K 59wks Other Alternatives #3 $1142K 62wks #4 $1783.5K 90wks # $K PRINTED COPIES ARE NOT DOCUMENT CONTROLLED. FOR THE LATEST AUTHORIZED VERSION PLEASE REFER TO THE APPROPRITATE DEPARTMENT WEBSITE OR DOCUMENTUM. File:RE.09.00.001 Conceptual Engineering Report for Substations Originating Department: Sponsor: App File: LUTHER FOREST - INTERCONNECTION WITH NYSEG Substation Engineering and Design Xxxxxx X. Xxxxxx 115KV/34.5KV STATION ENGINEERING DOCUMENT Conceptual Engineering Report for Substations Luther Forest - Interconnection with NYSEG 115kV/34.5kV station Version 1.0- 06/24/11 DOCUMENT CONTENTS Table of Contents 1.0 ALTERNATIVE 1 3 2.0 ALTERNATIVE 2 (ELECTRICAL SERVICE BULLITEN - ESB) 15
Sample 1Sample 2See All (5)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. [Docket No. ER98–4048–000] Take notice that on July 31, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, an unexecuted Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement and an unexecuted Network Operating Agreement between NMPC and Village of Xxxxxxx. The Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement and Network Operating Agreement specifies that Village of Xxxxxxx xxxx sign on to and will agree to the terms and conditions of NMPC’s Open Access Transmission Tariff as filed in Docket No. OA96–194–000. This Tariff, filed with FERC on July 9, 1996, will allow NMPC and Village of Xxxxxxx to enter into scheduled transactions under which NMPC will provide network integration transmission service for Village of Xxxxxxx. NMPC requests an effective date of July 1, 1998. NMPC has requested waiver of the notice requirements for good cause shown. NMPC has served copies of the filing upon the New York State Public Service Commission and Village of Xxxxxxx. Comment date: August 20, 1998, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Sample 1
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. [Docket No. ER98–4052–000] Take notice that on July 31, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an unexecuted Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement and an unexecuted Network Operating Agreement between NMPC and Green Island Power Authority. The Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement and Network Operating Agreement specifies that Green Island Power Authority will sign on to and will agree to the terms and conditions of NMPC’s Open Access Transmission Tariff as filed in Docket No. OA96–194– 000. This Tariff, filed with FERC on July 9, 1996, will allow NMPC and Green Island Authority to enter into scheduled transactions under which NMPC will provide network integration transmission service for Green Island Power Authority. NMPC requests an effective date of July 1, 1998. NMPC has requested waiver of the notice requirements for good cause shown. NMPC has served copies of the filing upon the New York State Public Service Commission and Green Island Power Authority. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation Docket No. ER98–4051– 000. Comment date: August 20, 1998, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Sample 1
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. [Docket No. ER98–4050–000] Take notice that on July 31, 1998, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation (NMPC) tendered for filing with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission an unexecuted Network between NMPC and Village of Richmondville. The Network Integration Transmission Service Agreement and Network Operating Agreement specifies that Village of Richmondville will sign on to and will agree to the terms and conditions of NMPC’s Open Access Transmission Tariff as filed in Docket No. OA96–194–000. This Tariff, filed with FERC on July 9, 1996, will allow NMPC and Village of Richmondville to enter into scheduled transactions under which NMPC will provide network integration transmission service for Village of Richmondville. NMPC requests an effective date of July 1, 1998. NMPC has requested waiver of the notice requirements for good cause shown. NMPC has served copies of the filing upon the New York State Public Service Commission and Village of Richmondville. Comment date: August 20, 1998, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Sample 1
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. [Docket No. ER97–2587–000] Take notice that on April 16, 1997, Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation tendered for filing a Notice of Cancellation of FERC Rate Schedule No. 137 and any supplements thereto. Comment date: May 14, 1997, in accordance with Standard Paragraph E at the end of this notice.
Sample 1
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. 143 F.3d 704, 716 (2d Cir. 1998) (citation, quotation marks, and alterations omitted). On this basis, “[a] court is not authorized to revisit or question the fact-finding or the reasoning which produced the award.” Id. Petitioner first challenges the Arbitrator’s determination that he was required to repay $593,797 of his 2017 bonus, on the ground that this was an “earned wage,” forfeiture of which, under New York’s “long-standing [public] policy,” is not permitted. Pet. Mem. at 41–42. Established New York public policy disfavors forfeiture of earned wages. E.g., Xxxxxxx v. Saatchi & Saatchi Holdings (USA), Inc., 958 F. Supp. 808, 824 (W.D.N.Y. 1997), aff’d 159 F.3d 1348 (2d Cir. 1998). In furtherance of that policy, New York also disfavors forfeiture of annual bonuses where such bonus constitutes “an integral part of [Petitioner’s] compensation package.” Id. at 824–25 (citation omitted). But bonuses are not considered earned wages where they are “entirely discretionary and subject to the non-reviewable determination of [the] employer.” Xxxxxxxx v. Ne. Capital & Advisory, Inc., 000 X.X.0x 770, 772 (N.Y. 2000). And “whether unpaid compensation constitutes a discretionary bonus or nonforfeitable earned wage is a question of fact[.]” Xxxxxx v. Cap. Co. of America LLC, 000 X.X.X.0x 504, 504 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002). Here, the Arbitrator made a clear factual finding that the bonus at issue “was in the absolute and sole discretion” of MHR and, therefore, did not constitute earned wages protected from forfeiture. PFA at 63. The Court will not revisit or question the fact-finding that produced the Awards, and Petitioner cannot show that forfeiture of a discretionary bonus “creates an explicit conflict” with New York laws and legal precedents. See Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, 143 F.3d at 716. Therefore, vacatur on this basis is unwarranted. Petitioner next challenges on public policy grounds the Arbitrator’s finding that he was required to forfeit $180,000 he received through a hedge fund distribution, because the interest “vested . . . no later than December 31, 2017,” and, therefore, was not “compensation earned” during his period of faithlessness that would otherwise be subject to forfeiture. Pet. Mem. at 41. The Arbitrator found that Petitioner breached his duty of loyalty under the faithless servant doctrine, and that under New York law, Petitioner was required to forfeit “all compensation that [he] received from his first faithless act”—a period she determined t...
Sample 1
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp x. Xxxxxx River-Black River, 673 F.3d 84, 105 (2d Cir. 2012) (quoting Dow Xxxxx & Co. v. Harrods Ltd., 346 F.3d 357, There must be “an underlying legal cause of action that the declaratory defendant could have brought or threatened to bring, if not for the fact that the declaratory plaintiff had preempted it,” because otherwise “any adverse economic interest that the declaratory plaintiff may have against the declaratory defendant is not a legally cognizable interest sufficient to confer declaratory judgment jurisdiction.”51 In particular, “[t]he mere existence of a potentially adverse patent does not cause an injury [or] create an imminent risk of an injury; absent action by the patentee, a potential [infringer] is legally free to market its product in the face of an adversely-held patent.”52
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Niagara Mohawk Power Corp

  • Pacific Gas and Electric Company “PG&E”), San Diego Gas & Electric Company (“SDG&E”), and Southern California Edison Company (“Edison”) (each a Participating TO) are entering into this agreement transferring Operational Control of their transmission facilities in reliance upon California Public Utilities Code Sections 367, 368, 375, 376, and 379 enacted as part of AB 1890 which contain assurances and schedules with respect to recovery of transition costs.

  • Real and Reactive Power Control 36 9.6 Outages and Interruptions. 37 9.7 Switching and Tagging Rules. 41 9.8 Use of Attachment Facilities by Third Parties. 41 9.9 Disturbance Analysis Data Exchange. 42 ARTICLE 10. MAINTENANCE 42 10.1 Connecting Transmission Owner Obligations. 42 10.2 Developer Obligations. 42 10.3 Coordination. 42 10.4 Secondary Systems. 42 10.5 Operating and Maintenance Expenses. 43 ARTICLE 11. PERFORMANCE OBLIGATION 43

  • Mobile Gas Service Corp 350 U.S. 332 (1956) and Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co., 350 U.S. 348 (1956) , and clarified by Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Capital Group, Inc. v.

  • Cloud Computing State Risk and Authorization Management Program In accordance with Senate Bill 475, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., pursuant to Texas Government Code, Section 2054.0593, Contractor acknowledges and agrees that, if providing cloud computing services for System Agency, Contractor must comply with the requirements of the state risk and authorization management program and that System Agency may not enter or renew a contract with Contractor to purchase cloud computing services for the agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program unless Contractor demonstrates compliance with program requirements. If providing cloud computing services for System Agency that are subject to the state risk and authorization management program, Contractor certifies it will maintain program compliance and certification throughout the term of the Contract.

  • Management of Company 5.1.1 The Members, within the authority granted by the Act and the terms of this Agreement shall have the complete power and authority to manage and operate the Company and make all decisions affecting its business and affairs.

  • Washtenaw Community College Eastern Michigan University Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx College of Engineering & Technology Student Services BE 214 xxx_xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx; 734.487.8659 734.973.3398

  • Management of the Company The Company's business and affairs shall be conducted and managed by the Member(s) in accordance with this Agreement and the laws of the State of the Formation. Single-Member (Applies ONLY if Single-Member): The Member(s) of the Company has sole authority and power to act for or on behalf of the Company, to do any act that would be binding on the Company or incur any expenditures on behalf of the Company. The Member(s) shall not be liable for the debts, obligations, or liabilities of the Company, including under a judgment, decree, or order of a court. The Company is organized as a “member-managed” limited liability company. The Member(s) is designated as the initial managing Member(s). Multi-Member (Applies ONLY if Multi-Member): Except as expressly provided elsewhere in this Agreement, all decisions respecting the management, operation, and control of the business and affairs of the Company and all determinations made in accordance with this Agreement shall be made by the affirmative vote or consent of Member(s) holding a majority of the Members’ Percentage Interests. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Member shall not, without the prior written consent of the unanimous vote or consent of the Member(s), sell, exchange, lease, assign or otherwise transfer all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; sell, exchange, lease (other than space leases in the ordinary course of business), assign or transfer the Company’s assets; mortgage, pledge or encumber the Company’s assets other than is expressly authorized by this Agreement; prepay, refinance, modify, extend or consolidate any existing mortgages or encumbrances; borrow money on behalf of the Company; lend any Company funds or other assets to any person or entity; establish any reserves for working capital repairs, replacements, improvements or any other purpose; confess a judgment against the Company; settle, compromise or release, discharge or pay any claim, demand or debt, including claims for insurance; approve a merger or consolidation of the Company with or into any other limited liability company, corporation, partnership or other entity; or change the nature or character of the business of the Company. The Member(s) shall receive such sums for compensation as Member(s) of the Company as may be determined from time to time by the affirmative vote or consent of Member(s) holding a majority of the Member(s)’ Percentage Interests.

  • California Independent System Operator Corporation a California nonprofit public benefit corporation having a principal executive office located at such place in the State of California as the CAISO Governing Board may from time to time designate (the “CAISO”).

  • Contractor’s Power and Authority The Contractor warrants that it has the full power and authority to grant the rights herein granted and will hold the County hereunder harmless from and against any loss, cost, liability and expense, including reasonable attorney fees, arising out of any breach of this warranty. Further, the Contractor avers that it will not enter into any arrangement with any third party which might abridge any rights of the County under this Contract.

  • Indiana Veteran Owned Small Business Enterprise Compliance Award of this Contract was based, in part, on the Indiana Veteran Owned Small Business Enterprise (“IVOSB”) participation plan, as detailed in the IVOSB Subcontractor Commitment Form, commonly referred to as “Attachment A-1” in the procurement documentation and incorporated by reference herein. Therefore, any changes to this information during the Contract term must be approved by IDOA’s IVOSB Division (“IVOSB Division”) and may require an amendment. It is the State’s expectation that the Contractor will meet the subcontractor commitments during the Contract term. The following certified IVOSB subcontractor(s) will be participating in this Contract: [Add additional IVOSBs using the same format.] IVOSB COMPANY NAME PHONE EMAIL OF CONTACT PERSON PERCENT Briefly describe the IVOSB service(s)/product(s) to be provided under this Contract and include the estimated date(s) for utilization during the Contract term: A copy of each subcontractor agreement must be submitted to the IVOSB Division within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Contract. The subcontractor agreements may be uploaded into Pay Audit (Indiana’s subcontractor payment auditing system), emailed to XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.XX.xxx, or mailed to IDOA, 000 X. Xxxxxxxxxx Street, Room W-478, Indianapolis, IN 46204. Failure to provide a copy of any subcontractor agreement may be deemed a violation of the rules governing IVOSB procurement and may result in sanctions allowable under 25 IAC 9-5-2. Requests for changes must be submitted to XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.XX.xxx for review and approval before changing the participation plan submitted in connection with this Contract. The Contractor shall report payments made to certified IVOSB subcontractors under this Contract on a monthly basis using Pay Audit. The Contractor shall notify subcontractors that they must confirm payments received from the Contractor in Pay Audit. The Pay Audit system can be accessed on the IDOA webpage at: xxx.xx.xxx/xxxx/xxxx/xxxxxxxx.xxx. The Contractor may also be required to report IVOSB certified subcontractor payments directly to the IVOSB Division, as reasonably requested and in the format required by the IVOSB Division. The Contractor’s failure to comply with the provisions in this clause may be considered a material breach of the Contract.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!