Vlastnictví Zdravotnické zařízení si ponechá a bude uchovávat Zdravotní záznamy. Zdravotnické zařízení a Zkoušející převedou na Zadavatele veškerá svá práva, nároky a tituly, včetně práv duševního vlastnictví k Důvěrným informacím (ve smyslu níže uvedeném) a k jakýmkoli jiným Studijním datům a údajům.
Indiana Veteran Owned Small Business Enterprise Compliance Award of this Contract was based, in part, on the Indiana Veteran Owned Small Business Enterprise (“IVOSB”) participation plan, as detailed in the IVOSB Subcontractor Commitment Form, commonly referred to as “Attachment A-1” in the procurement documentation and incorporated by reference herein. Therefore, any changes to this information during the Contract term must be approved by IDOA’s IVOSB Division (“IVOSB Division”) and may require an amendment. It is the State’s expectation that the Contractor will meet the subcontractor commitments during the Contract term. The following certified IVOSB subcontractor(s) will be participating in this Contract: [Add additional IVOSBs using the same format.] IVOSB COMPANY NAME PHONE EMAIL OF CONTACT PERSON PERCENT Briefly describe the IVOSB service(s)/product(s) to be provided under this Contract and include the estimated date(s) for utilization during the Contract term: A copy of each subcontractor agreement must be submitted to the IVOSB Division within thirty (30) days of the effective date of this Contract. The subcontractor agreements may be uploaded into Pay Audit (Indiana’s subcontractor payment auditing system), emailed to XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.XX.xxx, or mailed to IDOA, 000 X. Xxxxxxxxxx Street, Room W-478, Indianapolis, IN 46204. Failure to provide a copy of any subcontractor agreement may be deemed a violation of the rules governing IVOSB procurement and may result in sanctions allowable under 25 IAC 9-5-2. Requests for changes must be submitted to XxxxxxxXxxxxxxxXxxxxxxxxx@xxxx.XX.xxx for review and approval before changing the participation plan submitted in connection with this Contract. The Contractor shall report payments made to certified IVOSB subcontractors under this Contract on a monthly basis using Pay Audit. The Contractor shall notify subcontractors that they must confirm payments received from the Contractor in Pay Audit. The Pay Audit system can be accessed on the IDOA webpage at: xxx.xx.xxx/xxxx/xxxx/xxxxxxxx.xxx. The Contractor may also be required to report IVOSB certified subcontractor payments directly to the IVOSB Division, as reasonably requested and in the format required by the IVOSB Division. The Contractor’s failure to comply with the provisions in this clause may be considered a material breach of the Contract.
DUŠEVNÍ VLASTNICTVÍ The Institution acknowledges and agrees that the Sponsor shall have exclusive ownership rights to all Poskytovatel uznává a souhlasí, že Zadavatel bude mít výhradní vlastnická práva ke všem Study Data, improvements, developments, discoveries, inventions, work, know-how and other rights (whether or not patentable), created, developed, and/or reduced to practice as a result of or in connection with the conduct of the Study and/or the use of the Study Drug or the Confidential Information, together with all intellectual property rights relating thereto (“Intellectual Property”). The Institution shall promptly disclose in writing to PSI and the Sponsor all Intellectual Property made by the Institution, the Investigator and/or the Study Personnel. At the Sponsor's request, the Institution shall cause all rights titles and interests in and to any such Intellectual Property to be assigned to the Sponsor without additional compensation and provide reasonable assistance to obtain patents, including causing the execution of any invention assignment or other documents. Studijním údajům, vylepšením, na vývoj, k objevům, vynálezům, dílům, know-how a dalším právům (ať už patentovatelným či nikoli), vytvořeným, vyvinutým, a/nebo uvedeným do praxe v důsledku nebo v souvislosti s prováděním Studie, a/nebo používáním Studijního léku nebo Důvěrných informací společně s právy duševního vlastnictví s nimi souvisejícími (dále jen „Duševní vlastnictví“). Poskytovatel bude neprodleně písemně informovat PSI a Zadavatele o veškerém Duševním vlastnictví vytvořeném Poskytovatelem, Hlavním zkoušejícím a/nebo Studijním personálem. Na žádost Zadavatele zajistí Poskytovatel převod veškerých práv a zájmů týkajících se Duševního vlastnictví na Zadavatele bez další odměny a poskytne přiměřenou součinnost k získání patentu včetně zajištění podpisu dokumentů k převodu objevu nebo jiných dokumentů.
FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT AND WETLAND PROTECTION Executive Order 11988, Floodplain Management, May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26951), 3 C.F.R., 1977 Comp., p. 117, as interpreted in HUD regulations at 24 C.F.R. Part 55, particularly Section 2(a) of the Order (For an explanation of the relationship between the decision- making process in 24 C.F.R. Part 55 and this part, see § 55.10.); and Executive Order 11990, Protection of Wetlands, May 24, 1977 (42 FR 26961), 3 C.F.R., 1977 Comp., p. 121 particularly Sections 2 and 5. COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT The Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. § 1451, et seq.), as amended, particularly sections 307(c) and (d) (16 U.S.C. § 1456(c) and (d)).
Civil Fines Pursuant to Health & Safety Code §25249.7(b), and in settlement of all claims alleged in the notice, the Settling Entity agrees to pay a total of $1,600 in civil fines. This payment will be allocated in accordance with Health & Safety Code §25249.12(c)(1) and (d), with 75% of the penalty amount paid to the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) and the remaining 25% of the penalty amount paid to and retained by Xxxxxxx.
OHIP The Employer shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the billed premium for OHIP and will provide for payment of any reimposition of OHIP type premiums.
Mitsui Iron Ore Corporation Pty Ltd. to vary the Iron Ore (Marillana Creek) Agreement;
Washtenaw Community College Eastern Michigan University Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx College of Engineering & Technology Student Services BE 214 xxx_xxxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx; 734.487.8659 734.973.3398
Kesimpulan Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) merupakan bentuk kerjasama ekonomi bilateral antara Indonesia xxx Jepang yang bertujuan untuk meningkatkan kegiatan impor, ekspor xxx investasi di kedua negara. Kerangka perjanjian ini meliputi liberalisasi perdagangan, investasi, perlindungan hak kekayaan intelektual, transparansi, anti-persaingan, memperdalam kerja xxxx, xxx menetapkan prosedur untuk menegakkan perjanjian. Perjanjian ini terjalin dilandasi oleh kepentingan nasional masing-masing negara. Adapun kepentingan nasional Indonesia dalam perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxx mengoptimalkan kerjasama antara Indonesia-Jepang, mendapat kepastian akses pasar di Jepang yang lebih luas berkat penurunan tarif, meningkatkan arus barang xxx xxxx, mendapatkan transfer teknologi, sebagai sektor penggerak, program kesejahteraan, xxx juga menjadi pusat pengembangan manufaktur. General Review semestinya diadakan lima tahun setelah dilaksanakannya perjanjian. namun Jepang menunda pelaksanaan kegiatan ini sampai diubahnya Peraturan Menteri Keuangan yang diklaim tidak sesuai dengan IJEPA. Padahal sebelumnya Indonesia sudah menawarkan Jepang agar memberi usulan terkait peraturan ini sebelum diterbitkan. Indonesia masih mengejar kepentingannya untuk memenuhi perundingan ulang terkait tarif bea masuk xxx tarif impor yang belum terlaksana secara efektif. Selain berkenaan tentang kepentingan nasional, Indonesia sebenarnya juga tidak menetapkan tujuan yang jelas yang akan dicapai dalam kerjasama ekonomi ini. Diplomasi ekonomi yang diupayakan indonesia dalam kerjasama ekonomi bilateral ini didasari oleh beberapa faktor seperti latar belakang sejarah, hubungan perdagangan xxxx xxxxxx menguntungkan, xxx juga kemajuan perekonomian Jepang. Indonesia juga bergantung kepada situasi ekonomi Jepang karena kegiatan impor,ekspor, xxx investasi yang berlangsung memberi dampak terhadap pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia dilihat dari nilai perdagangan yang terus mengalami tren kenaikan. Meskipun menguntungkan,Indonesia harus terus bersikap tegas dalam melaksanakan perjanjian ini xxxxxx xxxxx banyak kepentingan nasional dari kerjasama bilateral ini yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Melalui analisis komprehensif terhadap kendala yang tidak kondusif bagi Indonesia dalam tinjauan umum IJEPA. Indonesia akan melanjutkan upayanya untuk mewujudkan kepentingan nasionalnya melalui kerja sama ini. Kerja sama ini diharapkan dapat terus meningkatkan hubungan baik perekonomian antara Indonesia-Jepang. DAFTAR PUSTAKA Anggraeni, N. A. (2020). DIPLOMASI EKONOMI JEPANG DALAM UPAYA PERPINDAHAN LIMBAH B3 MELALUI INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal PIR: Power in International Relations, 3(2), 156-172. Ardiyanti, S. T. (2015). Dampak Perjanjian Perdagangan Indonesia - Jepang (Ijepa) Terhadap Kinerja Perdagangan Bilateral. Buletin Ilmiah Litbang Perdagangan, 9(2), 129–151. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.30908/bilp.v9i2. 5 Arifin Rivai, A. N. (2017). Posisi Indonesia di Tengah Fenomena Korporasi Global (Studi Kasus: Relasi Dagang Indonesia – Toyota Pasca Kesepakatan IJEPA). Indonesian Perspective, 2(2), 105. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.14710/ip.v2i2.18 474 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx. (2019). Faktor Penghambat Peningkatan Investasi Jepang di Indonesia dalam Kerangka Kerja IJEPA 208-2018. Universitas Katolik Parahyangan. Gocklas C.S, L., & Sulasmiyati, S. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) Terhadap Nilai Perdagangan Indonesia-Jepang (Studi Pada Badan Pusat Statistik 2000-2016). Jurnal Administrasi Bisnis (JAB)|Vol, 50(5), 191–200. xxxxx://xxxxx.xxxxxx.xxx/media/pub lications/188892-ID-analisis- pengaruh-indonesia-japan- econom.pdf Hadi, S. (2014). Indonesia-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: an Indonesian Perspective. East Asian Policy, 06(03), 114–128. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1142/s17939305 14000312 Harahap, I. K., & Xxxxxx, A. M. (2015). DAMPAK PENERAPAN INDONESIA-JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT TERHADAP EKSPOR INDONESIA KE JEPANG. Media Ekonomi, 23(1), 27. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.25105/me.v23i1. 0000 Xxxxxx, X. S. (2016). KEGAGALAN INDONESIA DALAM IMPLEMENTASI INDONESIAN JAPAN ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT (IJEPA). Jurnal Lyceum, 4(1), 430–439. Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2015). Analisis Review Indonesia Japan Economic Partnership Agreement (IJEPA) dalam Perdagangan Barang. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1108/eb057810
Metode Penelitian Penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah hukum normatif. Sumber data yang dipergunakan pada penelitian ini adalah data sekunder yang terdiri dari :
