Not recommended Sample Clauses

Not recommended. We don’t recommend using your card as a guarantee of payment, for example as a deposit for hotels, cruise lines or car rental. As these retailers will not know how much your final bill will be, they will estimate it and place a hold on the estimated amount. If you choose to use your card as a guarantee of payment, you will not be able to access or spend the amount the retailer estimated during the hold period. We will release any funds held as soon as we are made aware of the exact amount of the transaction. When using your card: • at certain retailers, including bars and restaurants, and you don’t authorise the transaction with chip and PIN or contactless method, you will need to have a card balance equal to the bill amount PLUS up to 20%; • to buy fuel at an automated fuel pump, you must have a minimum balance on your card. This is to ensure there are sufficient funds available to cover the final cost of the transaction (and any tips) and to reduce the risk of a negative balance on your card. If your actual spend is less than the additional amount added, it may take up to 7 days from the date of the transaction before the difference is available to spend. We will only deduct the actual final bill amount from your card. You may not be able to use your card at some toll booths, car park vending machines and on board cruises or planes. This is because some of these retailers cannot obtain an online authorisation from us.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (29)
Not recommended. We don’t recommend using your card as a guarantee of payment; for example, as a deposit for hotels, cruise lines or car rental. As these retailers will not know how much your final bill will be, they will estimate it and place a hold on the estimated amount. If you choose to use your card as a guarantee of payment, you will not be able to access or spend the amount the retailer estimated during the hold period. We will release any relevant funds held as soon as the retailer allows us to do so. When using your card: ● at certain retailers, including bars and restaurants, and you don’t authorise the transaction with chip and PIN or via the contactless method – you will need to have a card balance equal to the bill amount PLUS up to 15%; ● to buy goods or services at certain retailers; for example, to buy fuel at an automated fuel pump you must have a minimum balance on your card. This is to ensure there are sufficient funds available to cover the final cost of the transaction (and any tips) and to reduce the risk of a negative balance on your card. For more information, please refer to the website. If your actual spend is less than the additional amount added, it may take up to 7 days from the date of the transaction before the difference is available to spend. We will only deduct the actual final bill amount from your card. You may not be able to use your card at some toll booths, car park vending machines and on-board cruises or planes. This is because some of these retailers cannot obtain an online authorisation from us.
Sample 1
Not recommended. VIA E-MAIL and not accepted 213-PAGE FULL PAGE TRIM: BLEED:
Sample 1
Not recommended. The Xxxx shall state reasons for the given rating. The rating shall be made on Form P-5. The Xxxx shall forward the recommendations for all applicants together with all the supporting materials for the college’s recommended candidates to the Xxxxxxx/VPAA no later than the fourth Friday in February. A copy of the rating, with reasons, and rank assigned to the promotion application shall be simultaneously provided to each applicant.
Sample 1
Not recommended. Indian Red Cross Society Old Age Home (OAH) Distt. Br. Damoh Audited Accounts do not reflect adequate expenditure in running the project. Not Recommended.
Sample 1
Not recommended. Add Option: Primrose Center Road (Double Seal)(700'x18'x2) Oak Grove Road to Bridge. $4,200.00 or at any time before performance of the work hereunder upon CONTRACTOR'S determination that the PURCHASER is not creditworthy.
Sample 1

Related to Not recommended

  • Board Recommendation The Acquiror Company Board, by unanimous written consent, has determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement are advisable and in the best interests of the Acquiror Company’s stockholders and has duly authorized this Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Company Board Recommendation (a) Subject to the terms of Section 6.3(b) and Section 6.3(c), the Company Board shall recommend that the holders of Company Shares accept the Offer, tender their Company Shares to Acquisition Sub pursuant to the Offer and, if required by the applicable provisions of Delaware Law, adopt this Agreement (the “Company Board Recommendation”). (b) Neither the Company Board nor any committee thereof shall (i) fail to make the Company Board Recommendation to the holders of the Company Shares, (ii) withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, amend or modify in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, (iii) adopt, approve, recommend, endorse or otherwise declare advisable the adoption of any Acquisition Proposal (it being understood that, only with respect to a tender offer or exchange offer, taking a neutral position or no position (other than in a communication made in compliance with Rule 14d-9(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act) with respect to any Acquisition Proposal shall be considered a breach of this clause (iii)), or (iv) resolve, agree or publicly propose to take any such actions (each such foregoing action or failure to act in clauses (i) through (iv) being referred to herein as an “Company Board Recommendation Change”). Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary set forth in this Agreement, if, at any time prior to the Appointment Time, the Company Board receives a Superior Proposal or there occurs an Intervening Event, the Company Board may effect a Company Board Recommendation Change provided that (i) the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel) that the failure to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law, and in the case of a Superior Proposal, the Company Board approves or recommends such Superior Proposal; (ii) the Company has notified Parent in writing that it intends to effect a Company Board Recommendation Change, describing in reasonable detail the reasons, including the material terms and conditions of any such Superior Proposal and a copy of the final form of any related agreements or a description in reasonable detail of such Intervening Event, as the case may be, for such Company Board Recommendation Change (a “Recommendation Change Notice”) (it being understood that the Recommendation Change Notice shall not constitute a Company Board Recommendation Change for purposes of this Agreement); (iii) if requested by Parent, the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss and negotiate in good faith with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to Parent of such Recommendation Change Notice; and (iv) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written proposal capable of being accepted by the Company to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Company Board shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with outside legal counsel), after considering the terms of such proposal by Parent, that a Company Board Recommendation Change is still necessary in light of such Superior Proposal or Intervening Event in order to comply with its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law. Any material amendment or modification to any Superior Proposal will be deemed to be a new Superior Proposal for purposes of this Section 6.3. The Company shall keep confidential any proposals made by Parent to revise the terms of this Agreement, other than in the event of any amendment to this Agreement and to the extent required to be disclosed in any Company SEC Reports. (c) Nothing in this Agreement shall prohibit the Company Board from (i) taking and disclosing to the Company Stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2(a) under the Exchange Act or complying with the provisions of Rule 14d-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and (ii) making any disclosure to the Company Stockholders that the Company Board determines in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel) that the failure to make such disclosure would reasonably be expected to be a breach of its fiduciary duties to the Company Stockholders under applicable Delaware Law; provided, however, that in no event shall this Section 6.3(c) affect the obligations of the Company set forth in Sections 6.2 and 6.3; and provided, further, that any such disclosure will be deemed to be a Company Board Recommendation Change unless the Board of Directors publicly reaffirms the Company Board Recommendation within five Business Days of such disclosure.

  • Shareholder Action by Written Consent without a Meeting Any action which may be taken at any meeting of Shareholders may be taken without a meeting and without prior notice if a consent in writing setting forth the action so taken is signed by the holders of Shares having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take that action at a meeting at which all Shares entitled to vote on that action were present and voted. All such consents shall be filed with the secretary of the Trust and shall be maintained in the Trust’s records. Any Shareholder giving a written consent or the Shareholder’s proxy holders or a transferee of the Shares or a personal representative of the Shareholder or its respective proxy-holder may revoke the consent by a writing received by the secretary of the Trust before written consents of the number of Shares required to authorize the proposed action have been filed with the secretary. If the consents of all Shareholders entitled to vote have not been solicited in writing and if the unanimous written consent of all such Shareholders shall not have been received, the secretary shall give prompt notice of the action taken without a meeting to such Shareholders. This notice shall be given in the manner specified in the By-Laws.

  • Shareholder Action by Written Consent Any action which may be taken by Shareholders by vote may be taken without a meeting if the holders entitled to vote thereon of the proportion of Shares required for approval of such action at a meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Section 10.4 consent to the action in writing and the written consents are filed with the records of the meetings of Shareholders. Such consent shall be treated for all purposes as a vote taken at a meeting of Shareholders.

  • Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our country-by-country analysis, 197 of the AEWA populations are already well-monitored both for population size and trend. Our prioritisation method allowed focusing on the AEWA conservation and management priorities (Priorities 1-2) and to consider cost effectiveness and feasibility (Priorities 3-6). Theoretically, the two- third target of the AEWA Strategic Plan can be just attained by focusing on the development of monitoring activities for Priority 1-5 populations (i.e. leaving out the 168 more widespread Priority 6 populations that would require more species-specific monitoring methods. Most of the Priority 1-5 populations would require improvement of the IWC though regional schemes focusing on the West Asian / East African flyway with possibly three subregional components in the Central Asia, Arabia and Eastern and Southern Africa. In the latter region, improvements in Tanzania and Mozambique are particularly important. In the Black Sea - Mediterranean - Sahelian flyway the focus should be primarily on the Sahel countries and especially on increasing the consistency of annual counts. The quality of monitoring is already better in the Black Sea and Mediterranean regions. In the East Atlantic, the ongoing capacity-building activities should continue and the consistency and representativity of site coverage should be further strengthened in most countries. Angola would require a major capacity improvement but primarily for the intra-African migrants on inland wetlands. It is also clear that the targets of the AEWA Strategic Plan cannot be achieved without complementing the IWC with periodic aerial surveys both in Western Africa as well as in Eastern and Southern Africa, by setting up a periodic offshore waterbird monitoring scheme in the Caspian Sea and by focusing in each country on a relatively small number of breeding bird species strategically selected in this report.

  • No Government Recommendation or Approval The Subscriber understands that no federal or state agency has passed upon or made any recommendation or endorsement of the offering of the Shares.

  • No Solicitation; Other Offers (a) Subject to the remainder of this Section 6.04, upon execution of this Agreement, the Company shall, and shall cause its Subsidiaries and its and their respective directors, officers, employees, Affiliates, investment bankers, attorneys, accountants and other advisors or representatives (collectively, “Representatives”) to, immediately cease or cause to be terminated any and all activities, discussions or negotiations with any Person with respect to any Acquisition Proposal. The Company shall promptly after the date of this Agreement instruct each Third Party which has heretofore executed a confidentiality agreement relating to an Acquisition Proposal with or for the benefit of the Company to promptly return or destroy all information, documents, and materials relating to the Acquisition Proposal or to the Company or its businesses, operations or affairs heretofore furnished by the Company or any of its Representatives to such Person or any of its Representatives in accordance with the terms of any confidentiality agreement with such Person. Subject to Section 6.04(b) and Section 6.04(c), from the execution of this Agreement until the Effective Time or, if earlier, the termination of this Agreement in accordance with Article 10, neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries shall, and the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not authorize any of its or their Representatives to, directly or indirectly, (i) solicit, initiate or take any action to knowingly facilitate, encourage or assist, or knowingly induce the making, submission or announcement of, an Acquisition Proposal, (ii) enter into or participate in any discussions or negotiations with, furnish any information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or afford access to the business, properties, assets, books, records or other information of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to, otherwise knowingly cooperate in any way with any Third Party that is seeking to make, or has made, or could reasonably be expected to make, an Acquisition Proposal, (iii) approve, adopt, endorse, or recommend an Acquisition Proposal, (iv) fail to make, withhold, withdraw or amend, qualify or modify, in each case in a manner adverse to Parent, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw or amend, modify or qualify, in each case in a manner adverse to Parent, the Company Board Recommendation, (v) propose publicly to approve, adopt, endorse or recommend any Acquisition Proposal (any of the foregoing in clause (iii), (iv) or (v), whether taken by the Board of Directors of the Company or any committee thereof being referred to as an “Adverse Recommendation Change”), (vi) enter into any agreement in principle, letter of intent, term sheet, merger agreement, acquisition agreement, option agreement or other similar instrument contemplating or otherwise relating to an Acquisition Proposal, or (vii) take any action to make the provisions of any “fair price,” “moratorium,” “control share acquisition,” “business combination” or other similar anti-takeover statute or regulation inapplicable to any transactions contemplated by an Acquisition Proposal; provided that no action expressly permitted by Section 8.08 with respect to any standstill provision in any agreement to which the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is a party shall constitute a breach of this Section 6.04. (b) Notwithstanding anything contained in Section 6.04(a) to the contrary, if at any time prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, (i) the Company or any of its Representatives has received a bona fide written Acquisition Proposal that the Board of Directors of the Company reasonably believes, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, constitutes, or is reasonably likely to lead to, a Superior Proposal, (ii) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take action with respect to such Acquisition Proposal would likely be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law, (iii) such Acquisition Proposal was not the result of a breach of Section 6.04(a) and (iv) the Company provides to Parent in accordance with Section 6.04(d) the information required under Section 6.04(d) to be delivered by the Company to Parent, then, so long as the foregoing conditions in the immediately preceding clauses (i)-(iv) remain satisfied, the Company, directly or indirectly through its Representatives, may (A) engage in negotiations or discussions with such Third Party and its Representatives with respect to the Acquisition Proposal, and (B) furnish to such Third Party or its Representatives non-public information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries pursuant to an Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement; provided that the Company shall concurrently provide to Parent any such information that is provided to any such Person which was not previously provided to or made available to Parent. (c) In addition, nothing contained herein shall prevent the Company or the Board of Directors of the Company from (i) taking and disclosing to its stockholders a position contemplated by Rule 14d-9 and Rule 14e-2(a) promulgated under the 1934 Act, (ii) making any legally required disclosure to the Company’s stockholders with regard to the transactions contemplated by this Agreement or an Acquisition Proposal (provided that neither the Company nor its Board of Directors may recommend any Acquisition Proposal unless expressly permitted by Section 6.04(e)), (iii) contacting and engaging in discussions with any person or group and their respective Representatives who has made an Acquisition Proposal that was not the result of a breach of this Section 6.04 solely for the purpose of clarifying such Acquisition Proposal and the terms thereof or (iv) issuing a “stop, look and listen” disclosure or similar communication of the type contemplated by Rule 14d-9(f) under the 1934 Act; provided, however, that any disclosure of a position contemplated by Rule 14e-2(a) under the 1934 Act other than (A) a “stop, look and listen” communication limited solely to the type contemplated by Rule 14d-9(f) under the 1934 Act, (B) any express rejection of any applicable Acquisition Proposal or (C) any express reaffirmation of the Company Board Recommendation, shall be deemed to be an Adverse Recommendation Change. No change, withdrawal or modification of the Company Board Recommendation shall change the approval of the Board of Directors of the Company for purposes of causing any law (including Section 203 of Delaware Law) to be inapplicable to the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement. (d) The Board of Directors of the Company shall not take any of the actions referred to in Section 6.04(b) unless the Company shall have delivered to Parent a prior written notice advising Parent that it intends to take such action. In addition, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Company shall notify Parent promptly (but in any event within twenty-four (24) hours) orally and in writing after the receipt by the Company (or any of its Representatives) of (i) any Acquisition Proposal, or (ii) any request for information relating to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or for access to the business, properties, assets, books or records of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries by any Third Party with respect to an actual or potential Acquisition Proposal. The Company shall also provide the identity of the Third Party making, submitting, inquiring about or expressing interest with respect to such Acquisition Proposal (except to the extent disclosure of such identity would breach a confidentiality obligation in effect prior to the execution of this Agreement) and (A) if it is in writing, a copy of such Acquisition Proposal and any related draft agreements and other written material from such Third Party (which, in each case, may be redacted, if necessary, solely to remove the identity of such Third Party in order to comply with a confidentiality obligation in effect prior to the execution of this Agreement) setting forth the terms and conditions of such Acquisition Proposal and (B) if oral, a summary thereof (including the material terms and conditions of the Acquisition Proposal). The Company shall keep Parent reasonably informed on a prompt and timely basis of the status and details of any such Acquisition Proposal and with respect to any change to the material terms of any such Acquisition Proposal within twenty-four (24) hours of any such change. The Company shall not, and shall cause its Subsidiaries not to, enter into any contract, arrangement, or commitment with any Third Party subsequent to the date of this Agreement, and neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is or shall become party to any contract, arrangement, or commitment, in each case, that prohibits the Company from providing such information to Parent. (e) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, prior to obtaining the Company Stockholder Approval, the Board of Directors of the Company may (i) (x) effect an Adverse Recommendation Change in respect of an Acquisition Proposal, or (y) enter into an agreement providing for a transaction that constitutes a Superior Proposal, if (A) the Company shall have received an Acquisition Proposal that was not the result of a breach of Section 6.04(a) that the Board of Directors of the Company determines, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors, constitutes a Superior Proposal and the Company shall have otherwise complied in all material respects with the provisions of Section 6.04, (B) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to take action with respect to such Superior Proposal would likely be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law, (C) the Company has previously notified Parent in writing that it intends to take such action (a “Section 6.04 Notice”), (D) the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss in good faith with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to Parent of the Section 6.04 Notice delivered to Parent, (E) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written, binding and irrevocable offer capable of being accepted by the Company to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Board of Directors of the Company shall have determined in good faith (after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisors), after considering the terms of such offer by Parent, that the Superior Proposal giving rise to such Section 6.04 Notice continues to be a Superior Proposal, and (F) in the case of clause (y) above, the Company terminates this Agreement in accordance with Section 10.01 (d)(i), or (ii) effect an Adverse Recommendation Change other than in respect of an Acquisition Proposal if (A) the Board of Directors of the Company determines in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel, that the failure to effect such Adverse Recommendation Change would likely be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law, (B) the Company has previously delivered to Parent a Section 6.04 Notice that it intends to take such action, (C) the Company shall have made its Representatives available to discuss in good faith with Parent’s Representatives any proposed modifications to the terms and conditions of this Agreement during the three (3) Business Day period following delivery by the Company to Parent of the Section 6.04 Notice delivered to Parent, and (D) if Parent shall have delivered to the Company a written, binding and irrevocable offer capable of being accepted by the Company to alter the terms or conditions of this Agreement during such three (3) Business Day period, the Board of Directors of the Company shall have determined in good faith, after consultation with outside legal counsel and after considering the terms of such offer by Parent, that the failure to effect such Adverse Recommendation Change would likely be inconsistent with its fiduciary duties under Applicable Law. If any Superior Proposal that is the subject of clause (i) of this Section 6.04(e) is revised, including any revision to price, then the Company shall deliver to Parent a new Section 6.04 Notice and again comply with the requirements of clause (i) of this Section 6.04(e) with respect to such revised Superior Proposal, on each occasion on which a revised Superior Proposal is submitted, provided that in connection with each new Section 6.04 Notice contemplated by this sentence, each reference to a three (3) Business Day period in the preceding sentence shall be deemed to be a reference to the longer of (x) a forty-eight (48) hour period or (y) a period ending on 11:59 p.m. (New York time) on the Business Day following delivery of the applicable Section 6.04

  • Holder Action by Written Consent Any action which may be taken by Holders at a meeting may be taken without a meeting if Holders holding at least a Majority in Liquidation Amount of all Trust Securities entitled to vote in respect of such action (or such larger proportion thereof as shall be required by any other provision of this Trust Agreement) shall consent to the action in writing.

  • Quorum and Required Vote (a) Forty percent (40%) of the outstanding Shares entitled to vote at a Shareholders' meeting, which are present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at the Shareholders' meeting, except when a larger quorum is required by this Declaration of Trust, the By-Laws, applicable law or the requirements of any securities exchange on which Shares are listed for trading, in which case such quorum shall comply with such requirements. When a separate vote by one or more Series or Classes is required, forty percent (40%) of the outstanding Shares of each such Series or Class entitled to vote at a Shareholders' meeting of such Series or Class, which are present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum at the Shareholders' meeting of such Series or Class, except when a larger quorum is required by this Declaration of Trust, the By-Laws, applicable law or the requirements of any securities exchange on which Shares of such Series or Class are listed for trading, in which case such quorum shall comply with such requirements. (b) Subject to the provisions of Article III, Section 6(d), when a quorum is present at any meeting, a majority of the votes cast shall decide any questions and a plurality shall elect a Trustee, except when a larger vote is required by any provision of this Declaration of Trust or the By-Laws or by applicable law. Pursuant to Article III, Section 6(d) hereof, where a separate vote by Series and, if applicable, by Class is required, the preceding sentence shall apply to such separate votes by Series and Classes. (c) Abstentions and broker non-votes will be treated as votes present at a Shareholders' meeting; abstentions and broker non-votes will not be treated as votes cast at such meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes, therefore (i) will be included for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present; and (ii) will have no effect on proposals that require a plurality for approval, or on proposals requiring an affirmative vote of a majority of votes cast for approval.

  • Securityholder Action by Written Consent Any action which may be taken by Securityholders at a meeting may be taken without a meeting if Securityholders holding more than a majority of all Outstanding Trust Securities (based upon their Liquidation Amount) entitled to vote in respect of such action (or such larger proportion thereof as shall be required by any express provision of this Trust Agreement) shall consent to the action in writing.