ODIP 2 report on impacts assessment Sample Clauses

ODIP 2 report on impacts assessment. Following the same methodology as for the ODIP Prototype 1 during the morning session, Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx reviewed the impact analysis results for Prototype 2. The target is to populate POGO with CSRs from the regional systems USA, AUS and EU. The EU system is already connected to POGO through the BSH, work has to be done for USA and AUS. Xxx Xxxxxx identified and drafted demonstration use case for the Southern Ocean Observing System (XXXX) for improving the information on what cruises have been done in this area. Sebastien will present later what is available in the area under Session 11 on XXXX Field Project Portals (paragraph 5.11).For the performance indicators, the available number of cruises in each regional system have been checked. At the end of ODIP first phase there are 7250 EU cruises, 1229 USA and 10 AUS cruises. A decrease to the EU entries compared to the October 2014 is because some ICES and BODC records in the old format had not been checked then for duplicates. Today these duplicates have not been inserted into the database. The implications for prototype 2 identified during the brainstorm sessions and reported in the Deliverable 4.2 are: a) on the standards and profiles used to transmit the CSRs and specifically for the ISO19139 format it was identified that the vocabularies references should become more matured using anchors-linked data and use GML versions. Also ISO19155-1 should become compliant with ISO19115-2. SeaDataNet3 project or POGO can deal with this format change and b) at regional level it could nice to have POGO face-lift by BSH within ODIP II project. At USA two interfaces have to be maintained, one for the national services and one for POGO. For AUS to federate additional cruise summary reports institutions, other than CSIRO. As a general implication, POGO should manage vessels with length less than 60m. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx said that POGO is doing that for EU and could extend to smaller ships. Xxx Xxxxx commented that it is easy to do for ships that are politically agreed to POGO, just add these ship names lists to POGO lists and then BSH can easily make the CSRs for these ships part of POGO. A simple email with the ships list to BODC is enough. Dick noted that the Eurofleets R/V database can be included. This would enlarge the scope of POGO as this database includes additional information such as ship capabilities, mass, etc. Xxx Xxxx noted that there will be potential implications for prototype 2 by the change of the ISO19155-1...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to ODIP 2 report on impacts assessment

  • ASSESSMENT REPORT Within 120 days following the general election held on November 2nd 2003, the returning officer of the munici- pality shall forward, in accordance with section 659.3 of the Act respecting elections and referendums in munici- palities (R.S.Q., c. E-2.2), an assessment report to the Chief Electoral Officer and the Minister setting out relevant ways to improve the trial and addressing, in particular, the following points : — the preparations for the election (choice of the new method of voting, communications plan, etc.) ; — the conduct of the advance poll and the poll ; — the cost of using the electronic voting system : – the cost of adapting election procedures ; – non-recurrent costs likely to be amortized ; – a comparison between the actual polling costs and the estimated polling costs using the new methods of voting and the projected cost of holding the general election on November 2nd 2003 using traditional methods ; — the number and duration of incidents during which voting was stopped, if any ; — the advantages and disadvantages of using the new method of voting ; — the results obtained during the addition of the votes and the correspondence between the number of ballot paper cards issued to the deputy returning officers and the number of ballot paper cards returned used and unused ; — the examination of rejected ballot papers, if it has been completed.

  • Self-Assessment (a) Subject to clause 4.4(b), for Services that are Self-Assessable:

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Impact Assessment If Service Provider desires to make any change, upgrade, replacement or addition that may have an adverse impact or require changes as described in Section 9.6(c) or increase the risk of Service Provider not being able to provide the Services in accordance with this Agreement or violate or be inconsistent with DIR Standards or Strategic Plans, then Service Provider shall prepare a written risk assessment and mitigation plan (1) describing in detail the nature and extent of such adverse impact or risk, (2) describing any benefits, savings or risks to DIR or the DIR Customers associated with such change, and (3) proposing strategies to mitigate any adverse risks or impacts associated with such change and, after consultation and agreement with DIR, implement the plan.

  • Screening and Assessment Grantee shall:

  • Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.

  • Evaluation Cycle: Formative Assessment A) A specific purpose for evaluation is to promote student learning, growth and achievement by providing Educators with feedback for improvement. Evaluators are expected to make frequent unannounced visits to classrooms. Evaluators are expected to give targeted constructive feedback to Educators based on their observations of practice, examination of artifacts, and analysis of multiple measures of student learning, growth and achievement in relation to the Standards and Indicators of Effective Teaching Practice.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013).

  • EQUIPMENT TAX ASSESSMENT 17.1 Any bid for public improvement shall comply with Nebraska Revised Statutes Section 77-1323 and 77-1324. Indicating; every person, partnership, limited liability company, association or corporation furnishing labor or material in the repair, alteration, improvement, erection, or construction of any public improvement shall sign a certified statement which will accompany the contract. The certified statement shall state that all equipment to be used on the project, except that acquired since the assessment date, has been assessed for taxation for the current year, giving the county where assessed.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!