Other National Performance and Accountability Framework Indicators Sample Clauses

Other National Performance and Accountability Framework Indicators. The following indicators may be included in future from the national framework as they are implemented nationally/resources become available. They will only be included if data is reportable in a timely fashion (within at least six weeks of the event) and the trend reported can be meaningful within a financial year. • C Difficile infection rates • Waiting times for cancer care • Hospital standardized Mortality Ratio • Death in low-mortality DRGs • In hospital mortality rates for… (selected conditions) • Relative stay index for multi-day stay patients • Day of surgery admission rates for non emergency multi-day stay patients • Percentage of asthma patients with a written asthma plan • Age standardized mortality of potentially avoidable deaths • Primary care type ED attendances KPI Target Xxxxx Xxxxx Red Expenditure budget ($‘000s) 314,245,000 ≤315,847,650 317,387,450 to 315,847,651 >317,387,450 Total NWAUs (including cross border) 46,988 ≤47,228 47,458 – 47,229 >47,458 Aged Care assessment program clients receiving timely intervention 91% ≥89.2% <89.2 to 87.4% <87.4% Elective surgery waiting times – category 1: admission within 30 days 86.5% ≥84.8% <84.8 to 83% <83% Elective surgery waiting times – category 2: admission within 90 days 77% ≥75.5% <75.5 to 73.9% <73.9% Elective surgery waiting times – category 3: admission within 130 days 90.5% ≥88.7% <88.7 to 86.9% <86.9% ED presentations departing within 4 hours 67% ≥65.7% 65.7 to 64.3% <64.3% Emergency department presentations seen in time: • category 1: resuscitation – attended to immediately 100% 100% <100%‌ • category 2: emergency – attended to within 10 minutes 70.5% ≥69.1% <69.1 to 67.7% <67.7% • category 3: urgent – attended to within 30 minutes 66% ≥64.7% <64.7 to 63.4% <63.4% • category 4: semi-urgent – attended to within 60 minutes 65.5% ≥64.2% <64.2 to 62.9% <62.9% • category 5: non-urgent – attended to within 120 minutes 92% 92% <92- 90% <90% Coded Separations Within Time 80% within 5 weeks ≥78.4% <78.4 to 76.8% <76.8% National Safety and Quality Health Standards Compliance 100% 100% <100%‌ SAB infections 0.92 ≤0.92 >0.92- 0.94 >0.94 Hand hygiene compliance 70% ≥68.6% <68.6 to 67.2% <67.2% Additional Aboriginal Health Practitioner Full Time Equivalents (net of any losses during year) 4 FTE 4 FTE < 4 FTE Potentially Preventable Hospitalisations 9.6% ≤9.8 >9.8 to 10.0% >10.0% Adult Health Checks – proportion of resident remote Aboriginal population 65% ≥63.7% <63.7 to 62.4% <62.4% Aged Care Occasi...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Other National Performance and Accountability Framework Indicators. The following indicators may be included in future from the national framework as they are implemented nationally/resources become available. They will only be included if data is reportable in a timely fashion (within at least six weeks of the event) and the trend reported can be meaningful within a financial year.

Related to Other National Performance and Accountability Framework Indicators

  • A Service Accountability Agreement This Agreement is a service accountability agreement for the purposes of the Enabling Legislation.

  • Service Accountability Agreements The HSP acknowledges that if the LHIN and the HSP enter into negotiations for a subsequent service accountability agreement, subsequent funding may be interrupted if the next service accountability agreement is not executed on or before the expiration date of this Agreement.

  • PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 The intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.12 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI, and the score of the employer will be given to and explained to the Employee during the assessment interview. 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 The parties hereby agree that none of (i) Section 739 of the WSTAA, (ii) any similar legal certainty provision included in any legislation enacted, or rule or regulation promulgated, on or after the Trade Date, (iii) the enactment of the WSTAA or any regulation under the WSTAA, (iv) any requirement under the WSTAA or (v) any amendment made by the WSTAA shall limit or otherwise impair either party’s right to terminate, renegotiate, modify, amend or supplement this Confirmation or the Agreement, as applicable, arising from a termination event, force majeure, illegality, increased cost, regulatory change or similar event under this Confirmation, the Equity Definitions or the Agreement (including, but not limited to, any right arising from any Acceleration Event).

  • Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act In connection with Section 739 of the Wall Street Transparency and Accountability Act of 2010 (“WSTAA”), the parties hereby agree that neither the enactment of WSTAA or any regulation under the WSTAA, nor any requirement under WSTAA or an amendment made by WSTAA, shall limit or otherwise impair either party’s otherwise applicable rights to terminate, renegotiate, modify, amend or supplement this Confirmation or the Agreement, as applicable, arising from a termination event, force majeure, illegality, increased costs, regulatory change or similar event under this Confirmation, the Equity Definitions incorporated herein, or the Agreement (including, but not limited to, rights arising from Change in Law, Hedging Disruption, Increased Cost of Hedging, an Excess Ownership Position, or Illegality (as defined in the Agreement)).

  • PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND REPORTING Performance indicators

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.

  • Background and Narrative of Budget Reductions 2. Assumptions Used in the Deficit Reduction Plan: - EBF and Estimated New Tier Funding: - Equal Assessed Valuation and Tax Rates: - Employee Salaries and Benefits: - Short and Long Term Borrowing: - Educational Impact: - Other Assumptions: - Has the district considered shared services or outsourcing (Ex: Transportation, Insurance) If yes please explain:

  • Health Care Accountability Ordinance If Administrative Code Chapter 12Q applies to this contract, Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Chapter 12Q. For each Covered Employee, Contractor shall provide the appropriate health benefit set forth in Section 12Q.3 of the HCAO. If Contractor chooses to offer the health plan option, such health plan shall meet the minimum standards set forth by the San Francisco Health Commission. Information about and the text of the Chapter 12Q, as well as the Health Commission’s minimum standards, is available on the web at xxxx://xxxxx.xxx/olse/hcao. Contractor is subject to the enforcement and penalty provisions in Chapter 12Q. Any Subcontract entered into by Contractor shall require any Subcontractor with 20 or more employees to comply with the requirements of the HCAO and shall contain contractual obligations substantially the same as those set forth in this Section.

  • Human and Financial Resources to Implement Safeguards Requirements The Borrower shall make available necessary budgetary and human resources to fully implement the EMP and the RP.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!