Evaluation and Award Process Sample Clauses

Evaluation and Award Process. The RTI Procurement Officer will award an agreement contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Seller (bidder) whose offer conforms to the RFQ/RFP will be most advantageous to RTI, price and other factors considered. The award will be made to the Seller representing the best value to the project and to RTI. For the purpose of this RFQ/RFP, price, delivery, technical and past performance are of equal importance for the purposes of evaluating, and selecting the “best value” awardee. RTI intends to evaluate offers and award an Agreement without discussions with Xxxxxxx. Therefore, the Seller’s initial offer should contain the Seller’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, RTI reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the RTI Procurement Officer to be necessary. The evaluation factors will be comprised of the following criteria:
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation and Award Process. 1. Proposal Evaluation Process
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation and Award Process. After determining that a bid satisfies the mandatory requirements stated in the RFP, the LEA shall use both objective analysis and subjective judgment in conducting a comparative assessment of the bid. The LEA must evaluate the bids and must state in the RFP/ contract how they plan to evaluate the bids. points Price/Cost (price must be primary factor) points Service Capability Plan points Experience, References points Financial, Condition/Stability, Business Practices points Accounting and Reporting Systems points Personnel Management points Innovation points Promotion of the School Food Service Program points Involvement of Students, Staff, and Patrons 00 Total (Must equal 100) While price alone is not the sole basis for award, price remains the primary consideration when awarding a contract under the competitive proposal method. Price/cost must be assigned the greatest number of points. The LEA’s officers, employees, board members, or agents shall neither solicit nor accept gratuities, favors, nor anything of monetary value from contractors nor potential contractors. To the extent permissible under state law, rules, or regulations, such standards shall be provided for appropriate penalties, sanctions, or other disciplinary actions to be applied for violations of such standards.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation and Award Process. The IRG Procurement Officer will award an agreement contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Seller (bidder) whose offer conforms to the RFQ/RFP will be most advantageous to IRG, price and other factors considered. The award will be made to the Seller representing the best value to the project and to IRG. For the purpose of this RFQ/RFP, price, delivery, technical and past performance are of equal importance for the purposes of evaluating, and selecting the “best value” awardee. IRG intends to evaluate offers and award an Agreement without discussions with Xxxxxxx. Therefore, the Seller’s initial offer should contain the Seller’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, IRG reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the IRG Procurement Officer to be necessary. The evaluation factors will be comprised of the following criteria:
Sample 1
Evaluation and Award Process. The RTI Agreement Officer will award an agreement resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Applicant whose offer conforms to the RFA and will be most advantageous to RTI, price and other factors, as outlined in this RFA, considered. The award will be made to the Applicant representing the best value to the project and to RTI. For the purpose of this RFA, price, delivery, technical and past performance are of equal importance for the purposes of evaluating, and selecting the “best value” awardee. RTI intends to evaluate offers and award an Agreement without discussions with Applicants. Therefore, the Applicant’s initial offer should contain the Applicant’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. However, RTI reserves the right to conduct discussions if later determined by the RTI Agreement Officer to be necessary. The criteria, and corresponding scoring weights, that will be used during the evaluation process are listed below: The composition and technical approach of the application (30%) Recent experience, current presence, and demonstrated working relationships with the Federal Government and in the regions(s) of interest (20%) The price in relation to the value offered by the application (20%) The organization’s technical and logistical capacity, including available and proposed resources (10%) Demonstrated knowledge of the country and of the region(s) of interest (10%)
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation and Award Process

  • AWARD PROCEDURE 1.1 If the Authority or any Other Contracting Body decides to source the Goods and/or Services through this Framework Agreement then it will award its Goods and/or Services Requirements in accordance with the procedure in this Framework Schedule 5 (Call Off Procedure) and the requirements of the Regulations and the Guidance. For the purposes of this Framework Schedule 5, “Guidance” shall mean any guidance issued or updated by the UK Government from time to time in relation to the Regulations.

  • Evaluation of Students A teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of students within the grading policies of the District based upon professional judgment of available criteria pertinent to any given subject area or activity for which the teacher is responsible. No grade or evaluation shall be changed without consultation with the teacher.

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan A) Every Educator has an Educator Plan that includes, but is not limited to, one goal related to the improvement of practice; one goal for the improvement of student learning. The Plan also outlines actions the Educator must take to attain the goals established in the Plan and benchmarks to assess progress. Goals may be developed by individual Educators, by the Evaluator, or by teams, departments, or groups of Educators who have the similar roles and/or responsibilities. See Sections 15-19 for more on Educator Plans. B) To determine the goals to be included in the Educator Plan, the Evaluator reviews the goals the Educator has proposed in the Self-Assessment, using evidence of Educator performance and impact on student learning, growth and achievement based on the Educator’s self-assessment and other sources that Evaluator shares with the Educator. The process for determining the Educator’s impact on student learning, growth and achievement will be determined after ESE issues guidance on this matter. See #22, below. C) Educator Plan Development Meetings shall be conducted as follows: i) Educators in the same school may meet with the Evaluator in teams and/or individually at the end of the previous evaluation cycle or by October 15th of the next academic year to develop their Educator Plan. Educators shall not be expected to meet during the summer hiatus. ii) For those Educators new to the school, the meeting with the Evaluator to establish the Educator Plan must occur by October 15th or within six weeks of the start of their assignment in that school iii) The Evaluator shall meet individually with Educators with PTS and ratings of needs improvement or unsatisfactory to develop professional practice goal(s) that must address specific standards and indicators identified for improvement. In addition, the goals may address shared grade level or subject matter goals. D) The Evaluator completes the Educator Plan by November 1st. The Educator shall sign the Educator Plan within 5 school days of its receipt and may include a written response. The Educator’s signature indicates that the Educator received the plan in a timely fashion. The signature does not indicate agreement or disagreement with its contents. The Evaluator retains final authority over the content of the Educator’s Plan.

  • Evaluation Process ‌ A. The immediate supervisor will meet with an employee at the start of their review period to discuss performance expectations. The employee will receive copies of their performance expectations as well as notification of any modifications made during the review period. Employee work performance will be evaluated during probationary, trial service and transition review periods and at least annually thereafter. Notification will be given to a probationary or trial service employee whose work performance is determined to be unsatisfactory. B. The supervisor will discuss the evaluation with the employee. The employee will have the opportunity to provide feedback on the evaluation. The discussion may include such topics as: 1. Reviewing the employee’s performance; 2. Identifying ways the employee may improve their performance; 3. Updating the employee’s position description, if necessary; 4. Identifying performance goals and expectations for the next appraisal period; and 5. Identifying employee training and development needs. C. The performance evaluation process will include, but not be limited to, a written performance evaluation on forms used by the Employer, the employee’s signature acknowledging receipt of the forms, and any comments by the employee. A copy of the performance evaluation will be provided to the employee at the time of the review. A copy of the final performance evaluation, including any employee or reviewer comments, will be provided to the employee. The original performance evaluation forms, including the employee’s comments, will be maintained in the employee’s personnel file. D. If an employee disagrees with their performance evaluation, the employee has the right to attach a rebuttal. E. The performance evaluation process is subject to the grievance procedure in Article 30. The specific content of a performance evaluation is not subject to the grievance procedure. F. Performance evaluations will not be used to initiate personnel actions such as transfer, promotion, or discipline.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!